不想更新,等到回家过年的时候再看看能不能更新吧!
👍6❤1👎1😍1
Signed 世界小九 共同号

Channel
@GYZZYYDS1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
49,486subscribers
-3,229 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002009700645 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GYZZYYDS1 |
| Description | 古月官方频道,感谢大家的我会越做越好的。反馈还有问题可以联系频道主小九: @XJYYDSBN 古月直装唯一作者:小九 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GYZZYYDS1 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 49,486 | -157 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 49,643 | -66 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 49,709 | -67 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 49,776 | -135 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 49,911 | -173 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 50,084 | -258 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 50,342 | -107 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 50,449 | -109 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:12 | 50,558 | -42 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:29 | 50,600 | -90 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 50,690 | -77 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 50,767 | -75 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 50,842 | -82 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 50,924 | -48 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 50,972 | -76 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 51,048 | -52 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 51,100 | -144 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 51,244 | -169 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 51,413 | -94 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 51,507 | first reading |
91 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 91 (5 August 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 19,280 |
| Reactions total | 232 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 05:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,061 reactions across 90 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 897 | 84.5% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 4.62% | |
| 🤣 | 21 | 1.98% | |
| 🤡 | 13 | 1.23% | |
| 😎 | 10 | 0.943% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 0.754% | |
| 🤯 | 8 | 0.754% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 0.66% | |
| 🍌 | 6 | 0.566% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 0.566% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.471% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 0.471% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 0.377% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 0.377% | |
| 😐 | 3 | 0.283% | |
| 😡 | 3 | 0.283% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.283% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.189% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.189% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.189% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.283% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,061 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
不想更新,等到回家过年的时候再看看能不能更新吧!
👍6❤1👎1😍1
Signed 世界小九 共同号
PUBG拦截讯腾服务器上传 PATCH_LIB("libanogs.so","0x1DDBF8","C0 03 5F D6"); PATCH_LIB("libanogs.so","0x1CEF44","C0 03 5F D6"); https://t.me/LAOLIUMOD
👍14
后续有时间再随便更新一下古月
👍15😘2
Signed 世界小九 共同号
pubg项目作者秋小成 秋小成 17374850071 韦金国 452124196703120973 杨玉莲 452402198603301520 韦杨成 451102200811121551 由于秋小成惹到大牛了 这边直接挂户处理😁
👍21🤯4❤2
Signed 世界小九 共同号
自由了
👍8
Signed 世界小九 共同号
PUBG 4.6 修复开局后5分钟崩溃 libanogs.so 0x4B3548 -698416192 https://t.me/LAOLIUMOD
👍14
PUBG 4.6 PATCH_LIB("libanogs.so","0x493EA8","00 00 80 D2 C0 03 5F D6"); //1/7/30/10 PATCH_LIB("libanogs.so","0x4F7D84","00 00 80 D2 C0 03 5F D6"); //7day https://t.me/LAOLIUMOD
👍11❤1💩1🤝1
好像新赛季了,有时间再更新吧,最近都不放假
👍12
Signed 世界小九 共同号
倒下了,明年绝对不会再进厂了,累死我了,感觉我要在这里虚脱了
👍11❤1
Signed 世界小九 共同号
和平精英拦截检测(只能拦截部分检测) 并非能让你完全裸奔 需要自己支配一些防封 感谢你们的支持 by.老六 https://t.me/LAOLIUMOD
👍11
要不要发和平精英so举报拦截
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍4
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 abcdefgjh破解主频道(和平精英无畏契约王者荣耀三 📢 Bing公益内核(有问题先0714看置顶) 📢 东南亚暗网灰产大事件 📢 渗透脱库后台 📢 挖矿盗U盘 📢 破解钱包多签区块链钱包转账协议 📢 海外-渗透-数据-DA 📢 黑客网站渗透APP破解数据提取,博彩改单 📢 全球免实名服务器/CDN 📢 星空Ws拉群机房 ----------------------------
👍10😡2🤝1
Signed 世界小九 共同号
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @GYZZYYDS1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
要不要发和平精英so举报拦截
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“古月主频道(冲70K)” (@GYZZYYDS1), 49,486 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GYZZYYDS1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.