Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ◼️广州外围◼️凯富国际◼️【外围俱乐部】

Channel

◼️广州外围◼️凯富国际◼️【外围俱乐部】

@GZYQYWW

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

110,816subscribers

+13,425 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001266838954
TypeChannel
Username@GZYQYWW
Description🏆 凯富国际 · 全球高端私享领航者 🏆 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💎 行业标杆|全时守候|至臻服务 凯富国际深耕行业多年,以极致品质定义高端体验。无论您身处何地,我们始终是您最可靠的私享管家。 ✨ 核心优势: 📍 全国覆盖 —— 深度布局国内主要城市,随时随地开启尊享。 ⚡️ 极速响应 —— 24H在线客服架构,预约或临时空降均零延迟。 💎 严选品质 —— 频道每日更新心动精选。 👤 服务管家: @nn138bot #深圳外围 #深圳上门 #深圳包养
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/GZYQYWW

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

83,727139,620111,673.5110,8167 August 20265 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 90 days, net +13,425. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,343–148,004 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 22:25110,816-441
4 Nov 2026, 21:17111,257+592
3 Nov 2026, 23:31110,665-413
3 Nov 2026, 02:27111,078+1,795
1 Nov 2026, 23:36109,283-1,868
1 Nov 2026, 00:38111,151+1,965
30 Oct 2026, 21:10109,186-382
29 Oct 2026, 19:51109,568+3,252
28 Oct 2026, 18:50106,316-2,498
27 Oct 2026, 18:16108,814-1,750
26 Oct 2026, 18:19110,564-1,309
25 Oct 2026, 17:49111,873+4,201
24 Oct 2026, 18:38107,672+11,055
23 Oct 2026, 19:0796,617-1,917
22 Oct 2026, 19:4798,534-3,440
21 Oct 2026, 14:46101,974-2,099
20 Oct 2026, 12:41104,073-3,757
19 Oct 2026, 15:46107,830-2,518
18 Oct 2026, 18:27110,348-1,044
17 Oct 2026, 21:16111,392first reading

Engagement

87 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 246 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.135%
avg views ÷ 110,816 subscribers
Avg views / post
149
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 87 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held87 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total3,886
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,670
Videos
≈757
Links
≈5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 52s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 86 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤787.5%
👍112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 18:59 UTC55 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🍓【 𝐆𝐙 · 极品御姐天花板 】🍓 🎀 妹妹档案 🎀 🎂 172E 🥛 皮肤白嫩 真胸无整 👱‍♀️ 极品御姐 A4腰大长腿 💖 独家体验 💖 🎀 广州兼职 乖巧听话 🍭 尤物身材 网红长腿气质款 #广州外围 #广州上门 #广州伴游 #高端外围 #3k

5 Nov 2026, 13:02 UTC25 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

TG必备的搜索引擎,快搜kuai帮你发现有趣群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 | Find cool stuff all in one bot! 机器人:@kuai @kuaia @kuaiaa 👉 https://t.me/kuaiaa?start=a_3DOHE69

4 Nov 2026, 19:50 UTC88 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🍓【 𝐆𝐙 · 纯欲初恋感 】🍓 🎀 妹妹档案 🎀 🎂 04年 166E 88斤 🥛 皮肤雪白细腻 打扮洋气 👱‍♀️ 初恋女友feel 高素质 💖 独家体验 💖 🎀 可盐可甜 乖巧听话 🍭 可纯可欲 可一字马🐎 #广州外围 #广州上门 #广州伴游 #高端外围 #3k

3 Nov 2026, 16:56 UTC114 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🍓【 𝐆𝐙 · 极品细腰尤物 】🍓 🎀 妹妹档案 🎀 🎂 01年 170E 90斤 🥛 精致无瑕容颜 盈盈一握细腰 👱‍♀️ 傲人蜜桃臀 皮肤白嫩细腻 💖 独家体验 💖 🎀 性感网红主播 乖巧听话 🍭 绝美黄金比例 欲罢不能 #广州外围 #广州上门 #广州伴游 #高端外围 #3k

2 Nov 2026, 17:56 UTC148 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🍓【 𝐆𝐙 · 洋气精致款 】🍓 🎀 妹妹档案 🎀 🎂 03年 167D 95斤 🥛 皮肤白皙 D罩杯 👱‍♀️ 五官洋气精致 少女感十足 💖 独家体验 💖 🎀 圈外兼职 乖巧听话 🍭 优雅迷人 温柔耐心 #广州外围 #广州上门 #广州伴游 #高端外围 #3k

31 Oct 2026, 17:29 UTC201 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🍓【 𝐆𝐙 · 白虎巨乳萝莉 】🍓 🎀 妹妹档案 🎀 🎂 05年 162D 90斤 🥛 娇小玲珑身段 傲人大D罩杯 👱‍♀️ 软萌可爱视感 气质佳 💖 独家体验 💖 🎀 笔直筷子腿 上下通粉 🍭 娇俏治愈 肥嘟嘟馒头bb 💌 解锁小确幸 💌 🉑 69 🉑👅 🉑✌️🉑✈️ #广州外围 #广州上门 #广州伴游 #高端外围 #3k

30 Oct 2026, 17:52 UTC193 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🍓【 𝐆𝐙 · 短发白虎可爱 】🍓 🎀 妹妹档案 🎀 🎂 07年 169C 90斤 🥛 皮肤滑嫩 0整容 👱‍♀️ 清纯可爱女友 紧致多💦 💖 独家体验 💖 🎀 唱歌🎵 跳舞💃 画画🎨 🍭 活好粘人 水多不粘手 💌 解锁小确幸 💌 🉑 69 🉑wt yt 🉑深喉 #广州外围 #广州上门 #广州伴游 #高端外围 #3k

29 Oct 2026, 17:04 UTC206 viewsread 3 November 2026
Photo

🍓【 𝐆𝐙 · 极品长腿学妹 】🍓 🎀 妹妹档案 🎀 🎂 04年 173D 90斤 🥛 天然0整 逆天笔直长腿 👱‍♀️ 高挑女神视感 气质佳 💖 独家体验 💖 🎀 学生兼职 温柔听话 🍭 不催不事 待客温柔如初恋 #广州外围 #广州上门 #广州伴游 #高端外围 #3k

28 Oct 2026, 17:25 UTC153 viewsread 2 November 2026
Photo

🍓【 𝐆𝐙 · 顶级超白纯欲 】🍓 🎀 妹妹档案 🎀 🎂 05年 170C 95斤 🥛 皮肤超级白皙 🥢筷子腿 👱‍♀️ 极致纯欲感 甜美可爱 💖 独家体验 💖 🎀 青春无敌 校花级初恋脸 🍭 温文尔雅 阳光女孩 #广州外围 #广州上门 #广州伴游 #高端外围 #3k

26 Oct 2026, 17:36 UTC182 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

🍓【 𝐆𝐙 · 高知学霸风 】🍓 🎀 妹妹档案 🎀 🎂 04年 168cm 47kg 🥛 纯天然c🐻 纯自然妈生脸 👱‍♀️ 极品清纯脸蛋 高学历 💖 独家体验 💖 🎀 温柔体贴 知书达理 🍭 乖巧听话 床叫一级 会吸会夹 #广州外围 #广州上门 #广州伴游 #高端外围 #3k

25 Oct 2026, 17:14 UTC206 viewsread 30 October 2026
Photo

🍓【 𝐆𝐙 · 纯欲高挑风 】🍓 🎀 妹妹档案 🎀 🎂 07年 170cm C罩杯 90斤 🥛 天然无整 无纹身 👱‍♀️ 可甜可欲 在校生兼职 💖 独家体验 💖 🎀 爱聊天 全程不冷场 🍭 温柔乖巧 配合各种姿势 #广州外围 #广州上门 #广州伴游 #高端外围 #3k

24 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC154 viewsread 29 October 2026
Photo

🍓【 𝐆𝐙 · 气质高挑风 】🍓 🎀 妹妹档案 🎀 🎂 00年 175D 🥛 天然傲人D杯 高挑极品长腿 👱‍♀️ 气质出尘脱俗 谈吐优雅 💖 独家体验 💖 🎀 知书达理 高素质听话 🍭 视觉盛宴 无赘肉无纹身 #广州外围 #广州上门 #广州伴游 #高端外围 #3k

Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @GZYQYWW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 69 posts on @GZYQYWW as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
38 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
22

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“◼️广州外围◼️凯富国际◼️【外围俱乐部】” (@GZYQYWW), 110,816 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GZYQYWW.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.