Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for گَندُمزآرِ خِیآلِ نآزَنین

Channel

گَندُمزآرِ خِیآلِ نآزَنین

@GandomzarEkhial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

788subscribers

+197 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002590048829
TypeChannel
Username@GandomzarEkhial
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GandomzarEkhial

Growth

585802693.514 August 2026 — 591 subscribers15 August 2026 — 585 subscribers23 August 2026 — 802 subscribers30 August 2026 — 788 subscribers78814 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +197. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 552–835 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 19:05788-14
23 Aug 2026, 11:09802+217
15 Aug 2026, 15:17585-6
14 Aug 2026, 06:47591first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

266 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54092801670570576128331.2%
🐳4717.7%
custom 57965735043294887543914.7%
custom 52333241014933511123412.8%
custom 52178441503003335123011.3%
custom 5427268941791649985207.52%
🆒134.89%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GandomzarEkhial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026

حتی آینه هم تصویر رو برعکس نشون می‌ده، ولی ما باهاش خودمون رو می‌بینیم. بعضی آدم‌ها هم همین‌طورن... با همه‌ی تفاوت‌هاشون، باعث می‌شن خودمون رو بهتر بشناسیم.

custom 57965735043294887543

Signed Nazanin

5 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC53 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026

شایدم همزمان شاغل بودن،خانه‌داربودن،دانشجوبودن، مستقل‌بودن،آروم‌وصبوربودن و درکنار همه اینا زن بودن همچین که بنظر میاد راحت نیست.

custom 52333241014933511124custom 52178441503003335122custom 54092801670570576121custom 57965735043294887541

Signed Nazanin

1 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC91 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026

نویسنده‌ای با سبک سایبرنتیک؟ اثری ازش نخوندم اما بنظرم واسم جالب بیاد چون سبکش به رشته‌ام خیلی نزدیکه.

custom 54092801670570576123custom 52178441503003335122🐳1custom 57965735043294887541

Signed Nazanin

29 Jul 2026, 21:49 UTC128 views11 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026

یادَم طُ را، فرآموش!

custom 54092801670570576126custom 57965735043294887542custom 52178441503003335121custom 52333241014933511121custom 54272689417916499851

Signed Nazanin

28 Jul 2026, 22:48 UTC135 views15 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

بنظرم درسته که هدیه گرفتن خیلی خوبه ولی هدیه دادن و هدیه خریدن فعل خیلی جذاب‌تریه....

custom 54272689417916499858custom 54092801670570576123🐳1custom 52178441503003335121custom 52333241014933511121custom 57965735043294887541

Signed Nazanin

28 Jul 2026, 02:02 UTC110 views12 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

دیروز پلنی واسه ۰۵ . ۰۵ . ۰۵ نداشتم ولی خب این هدیه و یادگاری قشنگ حسابی سوپرایزم کرد و این تاریخ رند رو واسم خیلی قشتگ ماندگار کرد...

🐳4custom 52178441503003335124🆒1custom 52333241014933511121custom 54092801670570576121custom 54272689417916499851

Signed Nazanin

21 Jul 2026, 21:16 UTC186 views23 reactionsread 14 August 2026

باید خوابمو درست کنم، هر شب دارم فردا میخوابم.

custom 540928016705705761210🐳4custom 52333241014933511124custom 52178441503003335122🆒1custom 54272689417916499851custom 57965735043294887541

Signed Nazanin

21 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC186 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @zanisdailyoq1

کلا ما عادت داریم الکی یک نفرو گنده کنیم و آخرش گندش در بیاد بگیم چرا این‌شد و وای چرا زن ستیزی کرد.خب چون الکی گنده‌ش کردیم. این ونسان،کی بود اصلا؟هنرش چی بود؟بلاگر بود؟نه.تولید محتوای خاصی می کرد؟نه.حتی یه روزمره نویس ساده مثل اغلب ماها نبود.نهایتا میچسبید به سقف ویدیو مسیج می‌گرفت دونفر بخندن. ولی خب چرا انقدر گنده‌ش کردین-کردیم. نمی‌دونم. من که اون اوایل یک چیزی گفت خوشم نیومد ازش و از چنلش لفت دادم.ایشون و امثال

custom 54092801670570576127custom 57965735043294887547🐳3custom 54272689417916499852🆒1custom 52178441503003335121custom 52333241014933511121

Signed Nazanin

20 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC150 views21 reactionsread 14 August 2026

پناه میبرم به هنر از شر انسان‌های عجیب.

custom 54092801670570576128🆒4custom 52333241014933511124custom 52178441503003335122🐳1custom 54272689417916499851custom 57965735043294887541

Signed Nazanin

20 Jul 2026, 03:56 UTC145 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026

قربون خدا برم فقط زلزله کم بود...

🐳7custom 52178441503003335125custom 54092801670570576125custom 57965735043294887542🆒1custom 52333241014933511121custom 54272689417916499851

Signed Nazanin

18 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC150 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026

شب‌های روشن،داستایفسکی همچینه که با یه جمله کلی عذاب وجدان بهت میده : اگر عنکبوتی که در اتاقت کُشتی تمام عمر فکر می‌کرد تو رفیق و هم اتاقی‌اش بودی آن‌وقت چه؟

custom 54092801670570576129🐳5custom 52333241014933511124custom 57965735043294887542custom 52178441503003335121custom 54272689417916499851

Signed Nazanin

16 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC171 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026

قطعا بدتر از سوالات سخت امتحان مراقبیه که مدام تذ‌کر میده و با همکاراش حرف میزنه و تق تق کفشش تمرکزتو به فنا میده...

custom 54092801670570576128custom 57965735043294887545🐳4custom 52333241014933511122🆒1custom 52178441503003335121custom 54272689417916499851

Signed Nazanin

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @GandomzarEkhial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“گَندُمزآرِ خِیآلِ نآزَنین” (@GandomzarEkhial), 788 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GandomzarEkhial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.