12 measurements spanning 29 days, net -165. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,271–8,486 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 20:40
8,296
-17
31 Aug 2026, 01:42
8,313
-16
27 Aug 2026, 15:08
8,329
-16
24 Aug 2026, 13:34
8,345
-21
21 Aug 2026, 06:04
8,366
-14
18 Aug 2026, 11:04
8,380
-22
15 Aug 2026, 16:08
8,402
-17
12 Aug 2026, 11:35
8,419
-18
9 Aug 2026, 08:32
8,437
-22
6 Aug 2026, 17:36
8,459
-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:50
8,461
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:49
8,461
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.87%
avg views ÷ 8,296 subscribers
Avg views / post
487
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
36 (24 May 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
7,790
Reactions total
158
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
479 reactions across 36 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
438
91.4%
😍
16
3.34%
🥰
13
2.71%
🕊
5
1.04%
😭
4
0.835%
💯
3
0.626%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 479 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
-
اللهم أبهرني بعطائك للحد الذي أنال من خلاله أعلى وأعظم مكانه بالدنيا والآخرة ، اللهم أدهشني بكرمك حتى تفيض حياتي بالرزق والخيرات التي تدوم لي طوال حياتي ، اللهم دللني بمحبتك وأجعلني أرى وأشهد وأشعر بمحبتك لي بكل تفاصيل أيامي يا حي يا قيوم .
ولكل من قال آمين . . 🤲🏻💛
-
جَدِّد العهد مع ربك بهذا الذكر ☁️💚
أصبحنا على فِطرةِ الإسلامِ ، وكلمة الإخلاصِ ، ودِينِ نَبيِّنا محمَّدٍ صلَّى اللّٰه عليه وسلَّمَ ، وعلى مِلَّةِ أبِينا إبراهيمَ ، حَنيفًا مُسلِمًا ، وما كان مِنَ المُشرِكين .
-
صبّحكم الله بالخير . . 🌤♥️
حاولوا ترجعوا لعبادة كنتم بتعملوها وانقطعتم عنها لأي سبب لأن الأكيد أهم سبب هو ذنوبنا .
يعني نعمل مثلًا ورد استغفار كبير وندعي الله يعيننا عشان نرجع للعبادة .
نتخيل الوقت اللي كنا ملتزمين بالعبادات والطاعات ونحاول مرة واثنين وثلاثة .
ما هو مينفعش اليوم يعدي بالصلاة بس
ونقعد نقول احنا مش كويسين ليش !
مفيش قرآن ، مفيش أذكار ، مفيش تسبيح
مفيش سماع دروس ، مفيش قيام
مفيش ضحى ، مفيش نواف…
-
والنفسُ إن لم تُدرِك أن الألم جزءٌ من رحلة الحياة ، ظلَّت تبحث عن طريقٍ بلا مشقة ، ولن تجده .
ولهذا ليس السؤال الحقيقي : كيف أعيشُ بلا ألم ؟
بل : أيُّ ألمٍ يستحق أن أتحمَّله ..؟
فكلُّ اختيارٍ في الحياة له ثمن ، وكلُّ طريقٍ يحمل نوعًا من المعاناة .
ألمُ الانضباط ، أم ألمُ الندم .
ألمُ الصبر ، أم ألمُ ضياع الفرص .
ألمُ المواجهة ، أم ألمُ الهروب .
ألمُ التغيير ، أم ألمُ البقاء في المكان نفسه .
فالإنسان لا يُعفى م…
The shares total 200%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
-
أسأل الله أن يُرضينا بمساحاتنا الصغيرة من الدنيا ، وأن يفتح أبصارَنا للجمال الخفِيّ فيها الذي يغفل عنه كثيرون ، وأن يُمتعنا بالنجاحات الصغيرة ، ويحمينا من سباقٍ يستحوذ على القلوب ويُنسيها نعمة الرضا ..🫶💗
❤13🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @Gaza_94. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 200%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
9. قيام الليل ﴿ وَالْمُسْتَغْفِرِينَ بِالأَسْحَارِ ﴾ .63%
The shares total 481%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
حالات واتساب قرآنية ✨ مقاطع دينية 😍 @halat1000 · 34,903 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
🍁 خريف العمر 🍁 @autumnSk · 47,184 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
دُعاء لـ رب السماء 🤍🌿 @My_lord2 · 153,642 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أدعية حد السماء 🕊️💚” (@Gaza_94), 8,296 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gaza_94.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.