Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gem • Global

Channel

Gem • Global

@GemHQ

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,634subscribers

-388 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002056953690
TypeChannel
Username@GemHQ
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GemHQ

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,63411,02210,8285 August 2026 — 11,022 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,022 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,015 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,996 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,980 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,975 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,966 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,944 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,938 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,925 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,908 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,889 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,877 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,867 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,858 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,838 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,819 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,802 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,793 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,784 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,778 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,767 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,757 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,753 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,740 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,730 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,712 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,702 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,666 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,634 subscribers5 August 202610 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 36 days, net -388. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,576–11,080 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 20:4010,634-32
7 Sept 2026, 19:5610,666-36
4 Sept 2026, 21:2110,702-10
3 Sept 2026, 08:3810,712-18
2 Sept 2026, 00:3510,730-10
1 Sept 2026, 00:1510,740-13
30 Aug 2026, 23:0410,753-4
30 Aug 2026, 01:4410,757-10
29 Aug 2026, 03:5410,767-11
28 Aug 2026, 04:0410,778-6
27 Aug 2026, 01:4710,784-9
26 Aug 2026, 02:4410,793-9
25 Aug 2026, 00:5710,802-17
23 Aug 2026, 16:2610,819-19
22 Aug 2026, 03:1510,838-20
20 Aug 2026, 16:3510,858-9
19 Aug 2026, 13:5210,867-10
18 Aug 2026, 12:5210,877-12
17 Aug 2026, 12:3310,889-19
16 Aug 2026, 05:2410,908first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,631
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 20 we hold a reading for · 90%
Most on one post
686
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GemHQ. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 October 2024 to 31 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2025, 10:04 UTC≈2,250 views0 reactions2 Starsread 1 September 2026
Photo

The best New Year’s gift for a crypto degenerate — a crypto sweater from @SweatersBot

5 Nov 2025, 08:49 UTC≈3,900 views0 reactions7 Starsread 1 September 2026

Delete the supply. Keep the believers.

5 Oct 2025, 02:10 UTC≈4,500 views0 reactions57 Starsread 1 September 2026

BTTF Two months ago, we killed our Ston.fi position. Check the team wallet — in a year and a half of building we never sold a single token. At peak, price was up +250%. No presale. No private round. No scammy shortcuts. We funded everything ourselves. The project we started sketching in early 2024 had to evolve. Thanks to Pavel for the donations (true story). Thanks to TON Foundation for showing zero interest in

7 May 2025, 14:23 UTC≈8,620 views0 reactions112 Starsread 1 September 2026

First Year A year ago, we launched 💎 $GEM. Since then, we’ve been the only token in the top-5 USDT liquidity pools to appreciate in price. From day one, our team was committed to delivering stability so you wouldn’t face a 50–99% loss after a year. Thank you for being with us! @GemHQ

25 Feb 2025, 17:51 UTC≈10,100 views0 reactions64 Starsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Just a reminder: $GEM is in the top 6 by liquidity in TON. And it’s #1 among independent projects. Not NOT, not DOGS, not hamsters—it’s GEM.

19 Feb 2025, 22:08 UTC≈9,100 views0 reactions9 Starsread 1 September 2026

💎 Just a reminder: $GEM is the only jetton trading above its pool inception price and has liquidity well over $1 million. Stop messing around with shitcoins, and get a real GEM!

15 Feb 2025, 23:17 UTC≈9,170 views0 reactions686 Starsread 1 September 2026

✨ Make Ton Great Again Following up on Tonnel’s take about TON Foundation burning through trusted funds inefficiently—here’s our two cents from the Gem team, the first L2 solution for TON. We haven’t received a single dollar from TON Foundation. Not for development. Not for marketing. Not for infrastructure. Yet for a whole year, we’ve been grinding, building a product that already boasts tens of thousands of user

13 Nov 2024, 10:30 UTC≈10,600 views0 reactions8 Starsread 1 September 2026
Photo

We're giving away a total of 2,200,000 MEM tokens to 100 lucky winners! ⚡️ Join now for your chance to win » For every friend you invite to the Giveaway, you'll earn extra 10 GEMs. The more friends you bring, the more GEMs you collect! Don't miss out on this cool opportunity to boost your MEM and GEM stash!

1 Nov 2024, 13:00 UTC≈11,300 views0 reactions206 Starsread 1 September 2026
Photo

The Gem project plans to burn up to 99% of its initial supply on the TON blockchain by the end of 2025 This move will leave only 10 billion $GEM in circulation from the original 1 trillion. These dramatic changes have been made possible thanks to Gem Chain’s unique technology, which supports lightning-fast, fee-free transfers of your favorite TON tokens without leaving Telegram, while keeping resource consumption l

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GemHQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

PixelSwap
@PixelSwap_io · 516,077
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
swap.coffee
@swap_coffee · 78,193
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gem • Global” (@GemHQ), 10,634 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GemHQ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.