Channel
@GenPAQ
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,061subscribers
-29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001185849466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GenPAQ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GenPAQ |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 2,061 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 2,065 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:55 | 2,071 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 2,074 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 2,075 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 2,074 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 2,076 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 2,079 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 2,086 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 2,090 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:50 | 2,090 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 4 | 57.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 42.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hamas Setuju Lucut Senjata? Adakah benar Hamas bersetuju melucutkan seluruh senjatanya, atau dakwaan itu telah disalah tafsir? Mengapa Benjamin Netanyahu masih enggan menerima cadangan tersebut walaupun ia digelar sebagai "perjanjian bersejarah"? Apakah syarat sebenar yang dipersetujui oleh Hamas, dan syarat apa pula yang dituntut Israel sehingga rundingan terus menemui jalan buntu? Baca analisis penuh untuk mema…
Perjanjian Abraham: Daripada Penyelewengan Agama kepada Pemerkasaan Projek Zionis Perjanjian Abraham sering dipersembahkan sebagai usaha membawa keamanan di Asia Barat. Namun, adakah ia sekadar perjanjian diplomatik, atau sebenarnya membawa implikasi yang jauh lebih besar terhadap Palestin, dunia Islam dan masa depan projek Zionis? Dalam episod terbaru Aqsa Syarif Podcast, kami mengupas isu ini daripada sudut al-Qu…
Bagaimana Yahudi menguasai dunia? Dalam episod terbaru ini, kami meneliti latar sejarah bangsa Yahudi, idea-idea yang sering dibincangkan, dan membezakan antara fakta, tafsiran serta dakwaan yang beredar di ruang awam. 📺 Nantikan siaran episod terbaru Aqsa Syarif. Jangan lepaskan perbincangan yang mengupas isu ini secara lebih menyeluruh dan berasaskan sumber. Malam ini jam 10 hanya di YT Aqsa Syarif Subscribe un…
Pilihan raya Israel semakin hampir. Tinjauan pendapat terkini menunjukkan Benjamin Netanyahu berdepan cabaran besar untuk mengekalkan kuasa, dengan peluangnya bergantung kepada kemampuan membentuk gabungan yang mampu meraih majoriti di Knesset. Dalam suasana politik yang semakin sengit, operasi ketenteraan Israel di Gaza terus dipergiatkan. Penganalisis melihat tindakan ini sebagai usaha kerajaan Netanyahu memperkuk…
Perang Amerika-Iran bukanlah baru bermula tahun ini. Ia telah melalui beberapa pusingan sejak beberapa tahun lalu. Namun, apa yang membezakan konflik tahun ini berbanding 2024 dan 2025 ialah serangan balas Iran tidak lagi tertumpu kepada Israel atau aset Amerika semata-mata, sebaliknya turut menyasarkan beberapa negara Arab yang menjadi lokasi pangkalan tentera dan kepentingan strategik Amerika. Sepanjang kira-kira …
Siapakah sebenarnya Syaikh Faruq Ramadan? Bagaimana seorang petani dan syaikh di Nablus berjaya merampas senjata seorang anggota Zionis sehingga mengorbankan dua anggota tentera berpangkat tinggi? Di manakah insiden ini berlaku? Siapakah dua anggota tentera yang terbunuh, dan mengapa identiti mereka begitu penting? Mengapa kerajaan Netanyahu bertindak pantas merobohkan rumah Syaikh Faruq serta mengetatkan kawalan d…
MENGAPA IRAN SERANG NEGARA TELUK, TAK SERANG ISRAEL? KETUA BAHARU HAMAS, ON HAFIZ BATAL LESEN NETWORK SCHOOL | S2EP23 Pusingan perang Amerika Syarikat-Iran kembali memuncak melebihi hari ke-10. Pada masa sama, Malaysia menjadi perhatian antarabangsa susulan tindakan berani membatalkan sebuah projek yang dikaitkan dengan Zionis di Johor. Turut menjadi tumpuan ialah pemilihan ketua baharu Hamas serta pelbagai lagi pe…
🔥 Kalau Network School ini tak viral, adakah ia masih boleh beroperasi? 🇲🇾 Adakah Balaji sebenarnya mahu membina "negara sendiri" di dalam Malaysia? 🇺🇸 Kenapa negara-negara Arab begitu takut kepada Amerika Syarikat dan Benjamin Netanyahu? 💥 Serta pelbagai lagi kupasan isu geopolitik dan perkembangan semasa yang hangat minggu ini. 📺 Nantikan episod penuh Jumaat (esok), jam 10.00 malam di YouTube Aqsa Syarif. http…
al-Hayyah, Abu Syuhada. Mengapa Khalil al-Hayyah dipilih memimpin Hamas? Bagaimana rejim Zionis melihat pelantikan beliau? Mengapa beliau digelar Abu Syuhada selepas kehilangan empat orang anak dalam perjuangan? Apakah mesej utama dalam ucapan sulungnya sebagai pemimpin baharu, dan apakah cabaran serta jangkaan yang bakal dihadapinya pada masa hadapan? Ikuti analisis penuh mengenai tokoh yang kini memimpin Hamas s…
MoU Trump Hanyalah Muslihat Perjanjian Amerika-Iran untuk menamatkan perang selama 60 hari yang digelar sebagai MoU dilaporkan telah berakhir, berdasarkan kenyataan Donald Trump sendiri. Namun, pengkritik melihat perjanjian itu sekadar helah untuk meredakan kemarahan masyarakat antarabangsa serta memulihkan keadaan ekonomi. Pada masa sama, ada juga yang berpendapat perjanjian tersebut terlalu memihak kepada kepent…
Saudi menyerang Yaman, Iran berperang dengan negara-negara Teluk, Mesir dan UAE membantu rejim Zionis menjajah Gaza, Syria dan Lubnan pula tanpa henti diserang oleh rejim Zionis. Terbaharu, Maghribi dilaporkan bakal menghantar tenteranya ke Gaza (untuk membantu IDF) dan pelbagai lagi perkembangan seumpamanya. Apakah sebenarnya yang sedang berlaku di Asia Barat? Hampir semua negara Islam di Asia Barat terlibat dalam…
PROJEK ZIONIS DI FOREST CITY, PERANG SAUDI-YAMAN & AMERIKA SERANG IRAN SEMULA | S2EP22 Isu dalam negara semakin mendapat perhatian, manakala ketegangan di Asia Barat pula terus memuncak. Adakah semua perkembangan ini berlaku secara berasingan, atau sebenarnya saling berkait dalam percaturan geopolitik dunia? Tambahan, hampir seminggu Amerika dan Iran berbalas serangan, masih gencatan senjata atau telah mula semula …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GenPAQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Generasi Pembebas Al-Aqsa (GenPAQ)” (@GenPAQ), 2,061 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GenPAQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.