Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Geniusz Rynku

Channel

Geniusz Rynku

@Geniusz_Rynku

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,825subscribers

-132 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002135000453
TypeChannel
Username@Geniusz_Rynku
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Geniusz_Rynku

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,79612,95712,876.57 August 2026 — 12,957 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,957 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,953 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,942 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,929 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,923 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,911 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,906 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,894 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,881 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,860 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,850 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,843 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,830 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,834 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,830 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,823 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,818 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,838 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,834 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,833 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,827 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,821 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,811 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,804 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,797 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,804 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,796 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,825 subscribers12,8257 August 202611 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 35 days, net -132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,772–12,981 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 19:3812,825+29
9 Sept 2026, 10:1812,796-8
6 Sept 2026, 03:4012,804+7
3 Sept 2026, 21:2012,797-7
2 Sept 2026, 10:3312,804-7
1 Sept 2026, 06:5612,811-10
31 Aug 2026, 04:1312,821-6
30 Aug 2026, 03:2312,827-6
29 Aug 2026, 00:5712,833-1
27 Aug 2026, 23:3412,834-4
27 Aug 2026, 01:0812,838+20
25 Aug 2026, 22:2312,818-5
25 Aug 2026, 01:0312,823-7
23 Aug 2026, 15:3812,830-4
22 Aug 2026, 01:3412,834+4
20 Aug 2026, 19:4212,830-13
19 Aug 2026, 17:2612,843-7
18 Aug 2026, 19:5812,850-10
17 Aug 2026, 18:5712,860-21
16 Aug 2026, 17:4412,881first reading

Engagement

275 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.25%
avg views ÷ 12,825 subscribers
Avg views / post
416
201 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.534%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
201
of 275 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 190 of 201 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held275 (5 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total83,668
Reactions total426
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 41s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

599 reactions across 259 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
48781.3%
🔥477.85%
👍254.17%
🌚142.34%
👀50.835%
👏50.835%
🤯40.668%
❤‍🔥30.501%
😎30.501%
🏆10.167%
👌10.167%
👨‍💻10.167%
🤗10.167%
🤝10.167%
🥰10.167%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 261 of the 275 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 599 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 275 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:24 UTC198 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

$USELESS +22% ✅ Po opublikowaniu wpisu cena aktywów od razu wzrosła o 22% Wykres wygląda bardzo obiecująco, co sugeruje dalszy wzrost Nie zapominajcie jednak o kontrolowaniu ryzyka

1

2 Sept 2026, 17:38 UTC229 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📊 👉 Jeśli BTC nie zdoła utrzymać się powyżej poziomu 75 tys. dolarów, prawdopodobnie zacznie spadać w kierunku poziomu 71 tys. dolarów. Jeśli ten poziom również nie zostanie utrzymany, kolejnymi kluczowymi poziomami będą 62 tys. dolarów, a następnie 57 tys. dolarów. Będzie to katastrofa dla „byków”, ponieważ długie pozycje najprawdopodobniej zostaną poddane agresywnej likwidacji w tych przedziałach cenowych. Innymi

4

2 Sept 2026, 16:08 UTC233 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Czasami publikuję przykłady współpracy ze mną nie bez powodu ➕ To dowód na to, że przekazuję sygnały, dzięki którym moi subskrybenci osiągają wraz ze mną dobry PNL. Jeśli chcesz ze mną współpracować, napisz do mnie @Tadeusz_trader 🤝

1

2 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC246 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📈📈 W sierpniu walidator rozwiązań Onchain firmy Bitwise odnotował napływ netto środków w wysokości 1,27 mln SOL w ramach stakingu — najwyższy miesięczny napływ środków od początku roku, co uczyniło go piątym co do wielkości walidatorem w sieci Solana

1

2 Sept 2026, 13:28 UTC281 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 SEC przygotowuje amerykański rynek akcji do handlu w trybie 24/7 oraz wdrożenia technologii blockchain. 17 września organ regulacyjny zorganizuje okrągły stół poświęcony przejściu amerykańskiego rynku na tryb 24/7 W programie przewidziano omówienie kwestii nadzoru nad rynkiem w nocy, płynności, rozliczeń i rozrachunków, obsługi technicznej systemów transakcyjnych, a także ewentualnego przejścia na pełny handel c

1

2 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTC333 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Dno na poziomie 58K będzie potem tak oczywiste. Bitcoin utworzył podwójne dno z tygodniową dywergencją byczą 😌

2🌚1

2 Sept 2026, 10:26 UTC351 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Mam możliwość Czekam na sygnał do wejścia Jeśli jesteś gotowy, napisz do mnie @Tadeusz_trader ✉️

1

2 Sept 2026, 08:52 UTC372 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Zyski spółek z indeksu S&P 500 osiągają rekordowo wysoki poziom 📊 Wyjaśnia to częściowo wzrost na rynku akcji, ale nie oznacza, że wyceny akcji są niskie. Kluczową kwestią jest obecnie to, w jakim stopniu przyszły wzrost został już uwzględniony w cenach. W przypadku bitcoina ta rozbieżność jest jeszcze bardziej znacząca. Kurs BTC wzrósł o kilka rzędów wielkości, podczas gdy zyski przedsiębiorstw rosły znacznie bard

1

2 Sept 2026, 07:02 UTC377 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Aktualne ceny rynkowe: #BTCUSDT: $77590 #ETHUSDT: $2420

1

1 Sept 2026, 20:46 UTC494 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Mapa cieplna BTC z ostatnich 7 dni

👏21

1 Sept 2026, 19:15 UTC448 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

$USELESS Ciekawe, że kapitalizacja wynosi zaledwie 100 mln $, a Bonk Guy jest obecnie rekomendacją tier 1, z niezrealizowanym zyskiem w wysokości 10 mln $ w aplikacji FOMO 👀👀 Obecnie na rynku panuje moda na trading społecznościowy – użytkownicy śledzą liderów opinii i kupują; w najlepszym razie cena może wzrosnąć nawet do 1 mld $

1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 275 posts we hold for @Geniusz_Rynku. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTCAnonymous Poll74 voters

Jakie są oczekiwania moich subskrybentów dotyczące rynku kryptowalut do końca 2026 roku❓

  1. Początek trendu byczego30%
  2. Kontynuacja trendu niedźwiedziego54%
  3. Bitcoin będzie notowany w obecnym przedzia20%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 275 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

321 Crypto - Powiadomienia🎯
@Powiadomienia_321Crypto · 27,523
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
KDP - Marek Stiller 🎯
@kdpwiadomosci · 47,365
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
Łukasz Michałek (Rare Crypto Signals)
@rarecryptosignals · 34,564
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Geniusz Rynku” (@Geniusz_Rynku), 12,825 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Geniusz_Rynku.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.