Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gentlemen's Club🤵🏻‍♂️

Channel

Gentlemen's Club🤵🏻‍♂️

@GentsAlpha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,543subscribers

-229 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002227900150
TypeChannel
Username@GentsAlpha
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GentsAlpha

Growth

8,5438,7728,657.57 August 2026 — 8,772 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,772 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,765 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,745 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,718 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,696 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,671 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,651 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,628 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,595 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,571 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,543 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net -229. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,509–8,806 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 04:588,543-28
2 Sept 2026, 15:558,571-24
30 Aug 2026, 16:268,595-33
27 Aug 2026, 13:458,628-23
24 Aug 2026, 13:378,651-20
20 Aug 2026, 15:158,671-25
17 Aug 2026, 17:248,696-22
14 Aug 2026, 21:358,718-27
11 Aug 2026, 04:588,745-20
8 Aug 2026, 11:028,765-7
7 Aug 2026, 17:168,772no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:098,772first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

154 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4629.9%
🤯2818.2%
🔥2717.5%
🤔2717.5%
👍106.49%
🥴63.90%
🥱42.60%
👀31.95%
😨21.30%
😱10.649%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GentsAlpha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 April 2026 to 3 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,700 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

$ANSEM is still pushing hard. The chart shows a clean breakout above the recent consolidation zone, now printing fresh ATHs near 180M with strong momentum. Higher highs and higher lows are holding up nicely as it climbs. From under 200k to here in just a few days is wild. Congrats to everyone who got in early and is still riding. This one looks like it has more room to run.

🤯42🤔2

2 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC≈1,400 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @TruthMarketNewsPhoto

JUST IN: Solana breaks above $80.00 @TruthMarketNews

5👍2🔥2

2 Jul 2026, 05:58 UTC≈1,300 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @TruthMarketNewsPhoto

BREAKING: Bitcoin breaks above $61,000 @TruthMarketNews

4👍1🤔1

30 Jun 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,230 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://x.com/gatzyxx/status/2071987131996602574?s=20

🤔42🤯2

29 Jun 2026, 23:04 UTC≈1,180 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Regarding Bitcoin: It is difficult to time the market precisely right now, especially after it just closed below its 200-week moving average for the first time this cycle. Personally, I am waiting for clearer signs of a cycle bottom before adding significant positions. I expect continued volatility and further correction before the next sustained rally. For those DCA-ing, continuing steadily through the second half

👀3🔥3🤔2

29 Jun 2026, 00:21 UTC≈1,120 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

$ANSEM just went nuclear, sub $1M to $100M+ in under 24 hours. While the broader market is still stuck in the mud. People keep calling meme coins dead… they’re not. They’ve evolved. Now it’s more about raw narrative energy and cultural momentum than just funny pictures. This category still sucks in the most new money and creates the wildest upside for smaller portfolios. Did you catch it?🎩

🤯4🔥2🤔21

18 Jun 2026, 15:44 UTC≈1,160 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @TruthMarketNewsPhoto

JUST IN: Bitcoin falls below $63,000 @TruthMarketNews

🤯4🥴21

12 Jun 2026, 16:59 UTC≈1,380 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Free $20💵 https://axiom.trade/@gents

🤔8🔥2🤯2

9 Jun 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,310 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

this week’s quick sweep under the February low then snapping back above the 200 week MA has the chart reminding me strongly of 2018 June feels like it’s already trying to form a local bottom. Expecting some choppy relief bounce through summer as volatility calms, then another leg down into Q4 for the real cycle low short term is still guesswork. bears have more room, liquidity is tight, and the best accumulation wi

6🔥2🤔2

28 May 2026, 11:01 UTC≈1,500 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @SOLPriceX

$ 80.64

👍4🤔1😱1

12 May 2026, 17:35 UTC≈1,830 views8 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Clean 5x yesterday! Looking for the next cook as we speak

4🔥2🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GentsAlpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gentlemen's Club🤵🏻‍♂️” (@GentsAlpha), 8,543 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GentsAlpha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.