Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Geopolitics Today

Channel

Geopolitics Today

@Geopolitics_Today

Not marked by Telegram, checked 26 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,523subscribers

-407 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002212220424
TypeChannel
Username@Geopolitics_Today
DescriptionGeopolitics | Global politics Markets and crypto Real-time coverage For ad/promotion : @yash_geopolitics
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Geopolitics_Today

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,5239,9309,726.57 August 2026 — 9,930 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,923 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,911 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,896 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,877 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,869 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,860 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,847 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,831 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,809 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,785 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,769 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,759 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,754 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,715 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,693 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,660 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,647 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,638 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,609 subscribers25 October 2026 — 9,586 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,566 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,548 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,523 subscribers7 August 20263 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 88 days, net -407. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,462–9,991 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 05:399,523-25
30 Oct 2026, 20:559,548-18
27 Oct 2026, 20:259,566-20
25 Oct 2026, 04:379,586-23
21 Oct 2026, 18:189,609-29
18 Oct 2026, 07:549,638-9
15 Oct 2026, 16:269,647-13
12 Oct 2026, 08:409,660-33
5 Oct 2026, 10:389,693-22
27 Sept 2026, 16:379,715-39
18 Sept 2026, 07:399,754-5
14 Sept 2026, 05:199,759-10
10 Sept 2026, 13:579,769-16
5 Sept 2026, 07:599,785-24
1 Sept 2026, 01:389,809-22
29 Aug 2026, 09:539,831-16
26 Aug 2026, 17:169,847-13
23 Aug 2026, 10:049,860-9
20 Aug 2026, 02:019,869-8
17 Aug 2026, 12:079,877first reading

Engagement

150 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.12%
avg views ÷ 9,523 subscribers
Avg views / post
488
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 150 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held150 (6 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total11,213
Reactions total130
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 09:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,690
Videos
≈198
Links
≈65

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11m 46s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,298 reactions across 148 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤38429.6%
👍27721.3%
🔥13010.0%
🤡1279.78%
😁937.16%
🤣423.24%
👏332.54%
🤔251.93%
🤬251.93%
🖕241.85%
🤮191.46%
💩151.16%
😡110.847%
👎100.77%
😱100.77%
👀80.616%
🤷‍♀70.539%
🆒60.462%
😢60.462%
❤‍🔥50.385%
15 further kinds413.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 148 of the 150 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,298 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

The Israeli Air Force launched multiple airstrikes across southern Lebanon several hours ago.

🔥3

4 Nov 2026, 17:36 UTC199 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Idf Neutralizes Explosive Device Near Nur Shams Israeli forces from the Ephraim Brigade, working alongside Border Police bomb disposal experts, located and destroyed an IED planted near Nur Shams, east of Tulkarm, on Tuesday. According to the IDF, the device was suspected of being intended to target Israeli security forces.

👍5

4 Nov 2026, 17:31 UTC191 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Pune based Artemon Aerospace has showcased its delta-wing unmanned aerial vehicle to the Indian Navy, capable of conducting surveillance and strike missions over distances of up to 1,000 km.

👏7

4 Nov 2026, 12:58 UTC263 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

IRGC claims it has SHOT DOWN a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone near the Strait of Hormuz. The IRGC has released footage it says shows the American reconnaissance and strike drone being hit in the early hours of this morning. The MQ-9 Reaper is one of the U.S. military's most advanced unmanned aircraft, capable of conducting long-range surveillance and precision strikes. Iran claims to have shot down AT LEAST 55 of these, and…

👍2

4 Nov 2026, 12:53 UTC263 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Israel Certifies Election: Netanyahu Bloc Falls Short of Majority Israel’s Central Elections Committee on Wednesday formally approved the final results of the October election. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing bloc secured 53 seats in the 120-member Knesset, eight short of a majority. The main opposition won 48 seats and Arab-led parties a record 19. President Isaac Herzog received the results and will…

👍4

2 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTC445 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

The IDF eliminated two operatives of Hamas's Nukhba Force: Mohammed Kamel Maslih Qdeih and Diaa Abdel Mohsen Mohammed Abu al-Rous. Both were taken out in the Gaza Strip.

❤5🔥3👍1

31 Oct 2026, 06:44 UTC610 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Indian and Australian forces conduct ship-to-shore troop insertion using INS Sharda and Sea King helicopter during AUSTRAHIND 2026 HADR training in Thiruvananthapuram.

👍6

31 Oct 2026, 06:01 UTC488 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Jammu and Kashmir Police have busted a jail-linked terror funding network in Shopian, arresting 10 terrorist associates connected to Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and The Resistance Front (TRF). Investigators traced online financial transactions exposing a network operating across the Union Territory, with funds used for terror activities and logistical support. More arrests are expected as the investigation continues.

❤6

30 Oct 2026, 12:18 UTC517 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a recent CNBC interview that Iran’s rial has collapsed under U.S. economic pressure, with the currency potentially reaching levels where printing high-denomination notes risks arrest.

👍3

30 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC476 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

UP cleric calls Sara Ali Khan's Kedarnath prayers sin under Sharia Bollywood actor Sara Ali Khan's visit to the Kedarnath Temple in Uttarakhand has drawn criticisms from a Muslim cleric from Uttar Pradesh, who has called her prayers a "sin under Sharia law". The Bareilly-based cleric has also issued a fatwa against the actor. The cleric's remarks have drawn a backlash from the common people, who have backed the acto…

👎3🤣1😁1

30 Oct 2026, 08:38 UTC484 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🇵🇰 WILD FOOTAGE! A big fire tore through a furniture market in Karachi, Pakistan, overnight Flames hit shops near Kamran Chowrangi in Gulistan-e-Johar and reached a neighboring residential building before crews got it under control.

👍2🔥2

29 Oct 2026, 17:31 UTC496 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

AI is moving fast.📈 Most people are already behind. 🔥 The biggest AI stories ⚡ New models & tools worth knowing 🧠 Research, funding & industry shifts 👉 https://t.me/TodayAI_News⁠

❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 150 posts we hold for @Geopolitics_Today. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Humanities Adda247 Class 12th
@Adda247_Humanities · 21,040
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 21 September 2026
Newspaper Notes for UPSC CSE
@iasips_preparation · 47,787
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 25 August 2026
Hindustan Jobs Net
@Hindustanjobsnet · 47,282
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 25 August 2026
English with Rubaika mam CUET
@englishwithrubaika · 27,167
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Geopolitics Today” (@Geopolitics_Today), 9,523 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Geopolitics_Today.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.