Channel
@Gh8lity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
411subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002170875226 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Gh8lity |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Gh8lity |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:30 | 411 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:22 | 411 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 September 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 359 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
s 🤫 أسرار ما تنقال s ‣ 𝟬𝟲h » قناة المتمرد ‣ 𝟬𝟰k » زوامل ‣ 𝟬𝟭h » لعلكم تتقون ‣ 𝟬𝟱h » طالب ضابح 😢🚶♂ ‣ 𝟬𝟭k » الانتظار Alintzar ‣ 𝟬𝟰k » غزة الان | فلسطينطوفان ‣ 𝟬𝟭h » من كل قطر زهرة ‣ 𝟬𝟭h » تعلم اللغة الانجليزية ‣ 𝟬𝟮h » مرافئ الحروف 4B.L ‣ » مملكة الورد ‣ 𝟬𝟮k » مملكة صدى القوافي ‣ 𝟬𝟭k » زهرة البنفسج ‣ 𝟬𝟮h » مريض نفسي ‣ 𝟬𝟳h » المصمم شبل اليمن ‣ 𝟬𝟭h » علم وجهاد ‣ 𝟬𝟭k » ابو عبيدةكتائب القسام🇵 ‣ 𝟬𝟵h » تحشيش اصلي وطيرفه ‣…
Signed مجلد هجران
عارفين مضيق جبل طارق أنا متضايق اكثر منه..
Signed کْآتٌبً فُيَلَسِوٌفُ
وأنا ليش اتجنب مايؤذيني ، ليش ما اروح أنا اؤذيهم وخليهم يتجنبوني ☹️☹️😂😂💔
Signed کْآتٌبً فُيَلَسِوٌفُ
ظننت أن القوه في المواجهة.. ثم اكتشفت أنها في التجاهل
Signed کْآتٌبً فُيَلَسِوٌفُ
الإصرار هو... سر النجاح أستمر حتى في أصعب اللحظات.
Signed کْآتٌبً فُيَلَسِوٌفُ
https://t.me/HalloweenCarnivalBot/app?startapp=8646770506
Signed تواصل المـــــــها
وَلَقَدْ نَعْلَمُ أَنَّكَ يَضِيقُ صَدْرُكَ بِمَا يَقُولُونَ فَسَبِّحْ بِحَمْدِ رَبِّكَ وَكُن مِّنَ السَّاجِدِينَ •✨🤍🤍
Signed کْآتٌبً فُيَلَسِوٌفُ
سألته زوجته؟ كم من النساء تحب غيري: قالها بعدد شعر رأسي! فتركته وهي تبكي 😭 ثم تذكرت انه اصلع 😂 فرجعت إليه وقبلت صلعته وقالت: عليك حركات ياصليعان😂😂😂💔
Signed کْآتٌبً فُيَلَسِوٌفُ
مهما كانت صورة الإنسان الخارجية سعيدة.. أنت ماتدري عن خفايا قلبه لذالك ترفق.
Signed کْآتٌبً فُيَلَسِوٌفُ
ماني بمعاتبك على شيء تبيه... عسى تلقى باللي تبيه راحتك..
Signed کْآتٌبً فُيَلَسِوٌفُ
إزرع داخل الجميع شيئاً يخصك.. أن لم يكن حبآ فليكن احتراماً 🤍
Signed کْآتٌبً فُيَلَسِوٌفُ
وفـي زحـام غـفـلـتـك إسـتـغـفـࢪ الـلـه لعل بينك وبين أمنيتك أستغفار🤍
Signed کْآتٌبً فُيَلَسِوٌفُ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Gh8lity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Gh8lity named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شخابيط قلـــ🖋ــــــــم” (@Gh8lity), 411 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gh8lity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.