Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اندیشه و قلم | احمد قدیری

Channel

اندیشه و قلم | احمد قدیری

@GhadiriNetwork

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,128subscribers

-169 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001000780926
TypeChannel
Username@GhadiriNetwork
Created13 October 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GhadiriNetwork

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “احمد قدیری — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

11,11411,29711,205.55 August 2026 — 11,297 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,297 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,296 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,283 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,279 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,268 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,266 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,267 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,263 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,252 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,236 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,230 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,217 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,214 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,201 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,194 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,192 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,177 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,165 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,156 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,154 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,149 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,142 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,137 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,134 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,121 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,120 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,114 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,128 subscribers11,1285 August 20266 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 32 days, net -169. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,087–11,324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 17:2011,128+14
4 Sept 2026, 04:1711,114-6
2 Sept 2026, 16:1711,120-1
1 Sept 2026, 12:3311,121-13
31 Aug 2026, 10:3511,134-3
30 Aug 2026, 14:0311,137-5
29 Aug 2026, 12:5811,142-7
27 Aug 2026, 14:0811,149-5
26 Aug 2026, 12:1411,154-2
25 Aug 2026, 14:3311,156-9
24 Aug 2026, 10:5711,165-12
22 Aug 2026, 20:0711,177-15
21 Aug 2026, 10:4711,192-2
20 Aug 2026, 13:4411,194-7
19 Aug 2026, 11:1711,201-13
18 Aug 2026, 12:2211,214-3
17 Aug 2026, 12:2711,217-13
16 Aug 2026, 04:3711,230-6
14 Aug 2026, 11:2811,236-16
13 Aug 2026, 05:1811,252first reading

Engagement

291 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.87%
avg views ÷ 11,128 subscribers
Avg views / post
765
234 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
238
of 291 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 220 of 234 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held291 (4 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total178,972
Reactions total3,603
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26m 13s
Average length
2m 11s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,088 reactions across 268 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,88337.0%
👍1,27025.0%
👏62812.3%
🤬3306.49%
👎2154.23%
💔1963.85%
👌1332.61%
😁791.55%
😢741.45%
🔥671.32%
🤔601.18%
🤯551.08%
😐380.747%
🙏250.491%
😘110.216%
😱110.216%
😨80.157%
🤝40.079%
🫡10.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 272 of the 291 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 291 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:52 UTC370 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#تبلیغ (کلیک کنید)

👍71👌1

2 Sept 2026, 20:51 UTC404 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

ناظر به روایت بی‌بی‌سی از پاسخ موشکی ایران به ماجراجویی اخیر آمریکا، توجه شما را به دو نکته جلب می‌کنم: اول اینکه جاسوس‌خبرنگار انگلیس با واژه‌گزینی هوشمندانه چطور یک عملیات گسترده، دردناک و موفق را کوچک و آلوده به تردید و ابهام می‌کند، و دوم آنکه رسانه‌های جبهه انقلاب چطور متوجه شیطنت‌های نهفته در گزارش نیستند و با مؤید گرفتن از گفته‌های نفیسه کوهنورد، او و رسانه متبوعش را ملاک و معیار موفقیت یک عملیات قرار می‌دهند!

👍104👌2👎2👏2

2 Sept 2026, 16:29 UTC759 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

📣 ۲۰٪ تخفیف برای ۲۰ سفارش اول ثبت سفارش: @MohamadiZed -ادمین تبادل و تبلیغ- #موقت

👏4👍1

2 Sept 2026, 15:49 UTC790 views39 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇮🇷 برای انسجام پست انتقادی خود در مورد رفتارهای زهرا و یوسف پزشکیان را با وجود آنکه بازدید بالا و فزاینده‌‌ای هم داشت، به دلیل آنکه در تضاد با اعلام ممنوعیت رهبر انقلاب درخصوص «ارتکاب هرآنچه به ضرر انسجام اجتماعی باشد» یافتم، حذف نمودم. ان‌شاءالله فرزندان ر.ج محترم نیز دلسوز آبروی پدرشان باشند. احمد قدیری ۱۴۰۵/۶/۱۱ @GhadiriNetwork

👏21👎12🤔32👌1

2 Sept 2026, 15:26 UTC888 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇮🇷 برای ایران جناب آقای دکتر پزشکیان! رئیس‌جمهور صادق، دلسوز و پرتلاش! اینجانب، توفیق شما را موفقیت ملت و کشور می‌دانم و همه سعیم در دفاع از زحمات خیرخواهانه شما و دولت‌تان بوده است. لطفا بفرمایید چگونه می‌توان در مواجهه با برخی نقطه ضعف‌ها راهکار را به دور از هیاهوی رسانه‌ای به دست‌تان رساند؟ احمد قدیری ۱۴۰۵/۶/۱۱ @GhadiriNetwork

👏23👎5🤯2👌1👍1🤔1

2 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC726 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

✉️ پیام مخاطب @GhadiriNetwork

5

2 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC803 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

✉️ پیام مخاطب @GhadiriNetwork

8👍4👌2🤔2👎1

2 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTC870 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇮🇷 چَک موشکی @GhadiriNetwork

22🔥5👏4👌2

2 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC867 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @iribnews

🔺تکذیب برخی ادعاها درباره توسعه روابط با چین 🔹دفتر نماینده ویژه جمهوری اسلامی ایران در امور چین در پی انتشار برخی اظهارات و مطالب رسانه‌ای مبنی بر اینکه جمهوری خلق چین، سفر نماینده ویژه کشورمان در امور چین و گسترش روابط تهران و پکن را مشروط به تحقق مجموعه‌ای از شروط از سوی جمهوری اسلامی کرده است، اطلاعیه‌ای صادر کرد. در این اطلاعیه آمده است: 🔹انتساب چنین شروطی به طرف چینی و ادعای مشروط شدن سفر و توسعه روابط دو کشو

🤔6👍52

2 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC842 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @iribnewsPhoto

🔺چین اجماع گروه ۲۰ بر سر بند تنگه هرمز را ناکام گذاشت 🔹چین در نشست گروه ۲۰ در برابر فشارهای آمریکا ایستاد و با بند پیشنهادی واشنگتن درباره تنگه هرمز مخالفت کرد؛ مخالفتی که مانع دستیابی اعضای این گروه به اجماع بر سر بیانیه مشترک شد. @iribnews

34👏7👍2

1 Sept 2026, 19:55 UTC≈1,030 views37 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @khamenei_irnewsPhoto

📣 توصیه‌ حضرت آیت‌الله العظمی خامنه‌ای رضوان‌الله‌علیه به قرائت قرآن و دعا برای پیروزی جبهه مقاومت 🔹️ رهبر شهید انقلاب اسلامی در پاسخ به سوالی، قرائت سوره فتح، دعای ۱۴ صحیفه سجادیه و دعای توسل را برای پیروزی جبهه مقاومت توصیه کرده بودند. 💻 Farsi.khamenei.ir

35🤬2

Showing the 12 most recent of 291 posts we hold for @GhadiriNetwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@GhadiriNetwork edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTCFinal Results2,220 voters approx.

📊 نشر حداکثری | سیاه‌ترین نقطه در کارنامه هاشمی رفسنجانی را کدام مورد می‌دانید؟

  1. تحمیل قائم مقامی منتظری به امام2%
  2. کارشکنی در جنگ تحمیلی4%
  3. حسن روحانی26%
  4. تغییر اکوسیستم کشور با سدسازی‌های افراطی و ساخت صنایع آب‌بر در مناطق خشک7%
  5. حمایت‌های پیدا و پنهان از عناصر فاسد امنیتی3%
  6. ترویج اشرافیت و آقازادگی26%
  7. دامن زدن به مفاسد اقتصادی و اداری4%
  8. ایجاد فتنه تحریم‌ساز ۸۸14%
  9. تلاش برای انحلال قوای نظامی و خلع سلاح موشکی12%
  10. سرکوب مخالفان، منتقدان و معترضان2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTCFinal Results34,800 voters approx.

📊 نشر حداکثری | حسن روحانی را برای کدامیک از خیانت‌های خود و دولتش مستحق مجازات بیشتری می‌دانید؟

  1. تاراج ذخایر طلا و ارز کشور17%
  2. اجرای سند ۲۰۳۰3%
  3. کشتار کرونایی مردم6%
  4. فتنه بنزین آبان ۹۸10%
  5. دلار ۴۲۰۰6%
  6. عقیم سازی صنعت هسته‌ای و فضایی5%
  7. لطمه به اعتماد عمومی و مشارکت سیاسی8%
  8. ایجاد حفره‌های اطلاعاتی و امنیتی5%
  9. اختلاس‌های نجومی و سریالی7%
  10. تسبیب ترور سردار سلیمانی34%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 291 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

چریک‌های جنگ نرم
@chrik_ir · 29,384
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 September 2026
تحلیلگر سیاسی (محمد ندیمی)
@tahlilgar_siasi · 35,478
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 September 2026
آرشیو سخنرانی‌های استاد رائفی‌پور
@Masafbox · 79,245
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اندیشه و قلم | احمد قدیری” (@GhadiriNetwork), 11,128 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GhadiriNetwork.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.