#تبلیغ (کلیک کنید)
❤6

Channel
@GhadiriNetwork
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,128subscribers
-169 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001000780926 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GhadiriNetwork |
| Created | 13 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GhadiriNetwork |
Recorded in 2019 as “احمد قدیری” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 11,128 | +14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 11,114 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 11,120 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:33 | 11,121 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 11,134 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 11,137 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 11,142 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 11,149 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 11,154 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 11,156 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 11,165 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 11,177 | -15 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 11,192 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 11,194 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 11,201 | -13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 11,214 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 11,217 | -13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 11,230 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 11,236 | -16 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 11,252 | first reading |
291 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 220 of 234 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 291 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 178,972 |
| Reactions total | 3,603 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,088 reactions across 268 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,883 | 37.0% | |
| 👍 | 1,270 | 25.0% | |
| 👏 | 628 | 12.3% | |
| 🤬 | 330 | 6.49% | |
| 👎 | 215 | 4.23% | |
| 💔 | 196 | 3.85% | |
| 👌 | 133 | 2.61% | |
| 😁 | 79 | 1.55% | |
| 😢 | 74 | 1.45% | |
| 🔥 | 67 | 1.32% | |
| 🤔 | 60 | 1.18% | |
| 🤯 | 55 | 1.08% | |
| 😐 | 38 | 0.747% | |
| 🙏 | 25 | 0.491% | |
| 😘 | 11 | 0.216% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 0.216% | |
| 😨 | 8 | 0.157% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 0.079% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 272 of the 291 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 291 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#تبلیغ (کلیک کنید)
❤6
#تبلیغ (کلیک کنید)
👍7❤1👌1
ناظر به روایت بیبیسی از پاسخ موشکی ایران به ماجراجویی اخیر آمریکا، توجه شما را به دو نکته جلب میکنم: اول اینکه جاسوسخبرنگار انگلیس با واژهگزینی هوشمندانه چطور یک عملیات گسترده، دردناک و موفق را کوچک و آلوده به تردید و ابهام میکند، و دوم آنکه رسانههای جبهه انقلاب چطور متوجه شیطنتهای نهفته در گزارش نیستند و با مؤید گرفتن از گفتههای نفیسه کوهنورد، او و رسانه متبوعش را ملاک و معیار موفقیت یک عملیات قرار میدهند!…
👍10❤4👌2👎2👏2
📣 ۲۰٪ تخفیف برای ۲۰ سفارش اول ثبت سفارش: @MohamadiZed -ادمین تبادل و تبلیغ- #موقت
👏4👍1
🇮🇷 برای انسجام پست انتقادی خود در مورد رفتارهای زهرا و یوسف پزشکیان را با وجود آنکه بازدید بالا و فزایندهای هم داشت، به دلیل آنکه در تضاد با اعلام ممنوعیت رهبر انقلاب درخصوص «ارتکاب هرآنچه به ضرر انسجام اجتماعی باشد» یافتم، حذف نمودم. انشاءالله فرزندان ر.ج محترم نیز دلسوز آبروی پدرشان باشند. احمد قدیری ۱۴۰۵/۶/۱۱ @GhadiriNetwork
👏21👎12🤔3❤2👌1
🇮🇷 برای ایران جناب آقای دکتر پزشکیان! رئیسجمهور صادق، دلسوز و پرتلاش! اینجانب، توفیق شما را موفقیت ملت و کشور میدانم و همه سعیم در دفاع از زحمات خیرخواهانه شما و دولتتان بوده است. لطفا بفرمایید چگونه میتوان در مواجهه با برخی نقطه ضعفها راهکار را به دور از هیاهوی رسانهای به دستتان رساند؟ احمد قدیری ۱۴۰۵/۶/۱۱ @GhadiriNetwork
👏23👎5🤯2👌1👍1🤔1
✉️ پیام مخاطب @GhadiriNetwork
❤5
✉️ پیام مخاطب @GhadiriNetwork
❤8👍4👌2🤔2👎1
🇮🇷 چَک موشکی @GhadiriNetwork
❤22🔥5👏4👌2
🔺تکذیب برخی ادعاها درباره توسعه روابط با چین 🔹دفتر نماینده ویژه جمهوری اسلامی ایران در امور چین در پی انتشار برخی اظهارات و مطالب رسانهای مبنی بر اینکه جمهوری خلق چین، سفر نماینده ویژه کشورمان در امور چین و گسترش روابط تهران و پکن را مشروط به تحقق مجموعهای از شروط از سوی جمهوری اسلامی کرده است، اطلاعیهای صادر کرد. در این اطلاعیه آمده است: 🔹انتساب چنین شروطی به طرف چینی و ادعای مشروط شدن سفر و توسعه روابط دو کشو…
🤔6👍5❤2
🔺چین اجماع گروه ۲۰ بر سر بند تنگه هرمز را ناکام گذاشت 🔹چین در نشست گروه ۲۰ در برابر فشارهای آمریکا ایستاد و با بند پیشنهادی واشنگتن درباره تنگه هرمز مخالفت کرد؛ مخالفتی که مانع دستیابی اعضای این گروه به اجماع بر سر بیانیه مشترک شد. @iribnews
❤34👏7👍2
📣 توصیه حضرت آیتالله العظمی خامنهای رضواناللهعلیه به قرائت قرآن و دعا برای پیروزی جبهه مقاومت 🔹️ رهبر شهید انقلاب اسلامی در پاسخ به سوالی، قرائت سوره فتح، دعای ۱۴ صحیفه سجادیه و دعای توسل را برای پیروزی جبهه مقاومت توصیه کرده بودند. 💻 Farsi.khamenei.ir
❤35🤬2
Showing the 12 most recent of 291 posts we hold for @GhadiriNetwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@GhadiriNetwork edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📊 نشر حداکثری | سیاهترین نقطه در کارنامه هاشمی رفسنجانی را کدام مورد میدانید؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📊 نشر حداکثری | حسن روحانی را برای کدامیک از خیانتهای خود و دولتش مستحق مجازات بیشتری میدانید؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 291 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اندیشه و قلم | احمد قدیری” (@GhadiriNetwork), 11,128 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GhadiriNetwork.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.