Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for إِستِقامَة

Channel

إِستِقامَة

@GhaforRahem

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,088subscribers

-86 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001789975002
TypeChannel
Username@GhaforRahem
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GhaforRahem

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@asansir_ala_aljana2/1636330 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTC@GhaforRahem/7860 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC1.0072 seconds
@GhaforRahem/7862 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 01:58 UTC@asansir_ala_aljana2/163661 Aug 2026, 01:58 UTC1.00under a minute
@GhaforRahem/7864 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC@asansir_ala_aljana2/163682 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC1.00under a minute
@asansir_ala_aljana2/163713 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC@GhaforRahem/7866 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC1.00under a minute
@GhaforRahem/7868 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC@asansir_ala_aljana2/163734 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC1.00under a minute
@asansir_ala_aljana2/163755 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC@GhaforRahem/7869 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC1.0072 seconds
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@asansir_ala_aljana213 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@asansir_ala_aljana2 (76)
@dinia2013 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (76)
@Ideogram011 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Ideogram0 (92)
@lll_5lloz7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@lll_5lloz (43)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 26 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @Ideogram0. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,0883,1743,1317 August 2026 — 3,174 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,174 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,168 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,160 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,155 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,152 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,146 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,132 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,128 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,120 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,112 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,104 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,095 subscribers19 September 2026 — 3,088 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,075–3,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:573,088-7
14 Sept 2026, 14:373,095-9
10 Sept 2026, 15:553,104-8
5 Sept 2026, 12:163,112-8
1 Sept 2026, 22:473,120-8
29 Aug 2026, 22:553,128-4
26 Aug 2026, 17:133,132-14
23 Aug 2026, 18:453,146-6
20 Aug 2026, 05:223,152-3
17 Aug 2026, 12:253,155-5
14 Aug 2026, 12:153,160-8
10 Aug 2026, 17:033,168-6
7 Aug 2026, 14:403,174no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:013,174first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1894.7%
😢15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC5 viewsread 7 August 2026

‏﴿ وَرَفَعْنَاهُ مَكَانًا عَلِيًّا ﴾ ‏اللهُمّ الرفعة والمكانة وطِيب المقام ‏ في الدُنيا والآخرة ‏- الوتر ‏﴿ وَالمُستَغفِرينَ بِالأَسحارِ ﴾ استغفرالله الذي لا إله إلا هو الحي القيوم وأتوب إليه.

7 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

﴿وَاذْكُر رَّبَّكَ إِذَا نَسِيتَ﴾ - سبحان الله - الحمد لله - لا إله إلا الله - الله أكبر - لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله - سبحان الله العظيم - سبحان الله وبحمده - أستغفر الله العظيم - استغفر الله و اتوب إليه - اللهم صلِ وسلم على محمد ﷺ - استغفر الله الذي لا اله الا هو الحي القيوم و اتوب إليه - لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين

1

7 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC19 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

لا تترك هذه الجمعة تمضي كسابقتها اجعل من دقائق الغروب مأوى لروحك المتعبة اهمس بأحلامك تضرع بيقين و دعْ أمنياتك ترحل نحو السماء و اعلم أن الذي أمرك بالدعاء قد تكفّل بالإجابة و لو بعد حين ولا تنسوا قراءه سوره الكهف والاكثار من الصلاه ع النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم 🤍

2

7 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

إِنَّ اللَّهَ وَمَلَائِڪَتَهُ يُصَلُّونَ عَلَى النَّبِيِّ يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ صَلُّوا عَلَيْهِ وَسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا اللهُم صلِّ وسلم وبارك على مُحمد وعلي آل مُحمد كما صليت على إبراهيم وعلى آل إبراهيم إنك حميد مجيد ، اللهُم بارك على مُحمد وعلى آل مُحمد كما باركت على إبراهيم وعلى آل إبراهيم إنك حميد مجيـد 💚🥰

1

6 Aug 2026, 23:28 UTC27 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‏﴿ وَرَفَعْنَاهُ مَكَانًا عَلِيًّا ﴾ ‏اللهُمّ الرفعة والمكانة وطِيب المقام ‏ في الدُنيا والآخرة ‏- الوتر ‏﴿ وَالمُستَغفِرينَ بِالأَسحارِ ﴾ استغفرالله الذي لا إله إلا هو الحي القيوم وأتوب إليه.

2

6 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC29 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«شَمسُ الخَمِيسِ إذَا تَغِيب زِد فِي الصَّلَاةِ عَلىٰ الحَبيب» ﷺ.

6 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC31 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

الصلاة على سيدنا النبي ﷺ لها أثر عجيب مع الإنسان .. بلا أسباب مادية: همّ يزول، كرب يُفرج، مرض يُعافى، رزق من حيث لا تحتسب، نفس طيبة راضية بما يقضيه الله عليها! اللهم صل على سيدنا محمد صلاةً تُرضيك، وتُرضيه، وترضى بها عنّا، واكفنا بها ما أهمنا من أمري الدنيا والآخرة.

1

5 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‏الصـلاة مُجلِـبةٌ للرزق ، مُبيـضةٌ للوجه ، مُفـرِحةٌ للنفس ، شَـارِحةٌ للصدر ، مُغـذيةٌ للروح ، مُنَـورةٌ للقلب ، حـافـظةٌ للنعمة ، دافِـعةٌ للنقمة . ‏- اللّٰهُمَّ قلباً لا يتكاسَلُ عن الصـلاةِ ولا يؤخِرها .

1

5 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"‏النظرُ إلى السماءِ فيه حسنُ ظنٍ بالله وكأن الإنسان يرقُب نزولَ الغوثِ والفرجِ والخيرِ". - الطريفي. "سُبحانك ربي العظيم المُبدع".💙🌦

2

5 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC50 viewsread 7 August 2026

والله إنَّ استفتاح اليوم بصلاة الفجر في وقتها ومن ثُمَّ قراءة أذكار الصباح وتلاوة ما تيسَّر من القُرآن تصنع فارقًا كبيـرًا في يومك، تجد أثرُها يعود على يومك كاملاً من بركةٍ وتيسيرٍ وإعانةٍ، حتى على الناحية النفسية تجد الانشراح والطمأنينة والسعة لا تُفارق دربك وقلبك. صلاة_الفجر واذكار الصباح رضي الله عنكم وأرضاكم وتمم اموركم

4 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC54 viewsread 7 August 2026

﴿لَا تَدْرِي لَعَلَّ اللَّهَ يُحْدِثُ بَعْدَ ذَٰلِكَ أَمْرًا﴾ اطمئن.. فكم من ضيقٍ فرَّجه الله، وكم من كربٍ كشفه الله.. وكم من أمرٍ ظننته مستحيلًا؛ فجعله الله يسيرًا.. فعلِّق قلبك بالله، ولا تيأس أبدًا.

4 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC58 viewsread 7 August 2026

‏اللهم لا تفجعني في نفسي اللهم لا تفجعني في اهلي اللهم لا تفجعني في صحتي اللهم لا تفجعني في مستقبلي

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @GhaforRahem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

حنان محمود لاشين
@HananLachine · 118,259
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“إِستِقامَة” (@GhaforRahem), 3,088 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GhaforRahem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.