Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Гиацинт

Channel

Гиацинт

@Giazint_Z

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

663subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001508302725
TypeChannel
Username@Giazint_Z
Created25 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Giazint_Z

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

663672667.56 August 2026 — 672 subscribers6 August 2026 — 672 subscribers12 August 2026 — 667 subscribers13 September 2026 — 663 subscribers6 August 202613 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 38 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 662–673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 05:15663-4
12 Aug 2026, 22:55667-5
6 Aug 2026, 16:40672no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:55672first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 23 August 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

181 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12066.3%
😢2815.5%
👏105.52%
🔥94.97%
😁84.42%
🤬52.76%
10.552%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2022 to 20 September 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2022, 17:45 UTC≈6,330 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

СЛАВА УКРАИНЕ 🇺🇦 Русачки, как Киев за 3 дня?

👍9👏6🔥2

24 Aug 2022, 14:16 UTC≈9,180 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

⚡️☢️Росгвардейцы предотвратили угрозу безопасности на Запорожской АЭС. Они задержали двоих сотрудников атомной станции, которые передавали ВСУ информацию о местонахождении личного состава и техники на территории ЗАЭС. Кроме того, задержан нарушитель пропускного режима, который передавал координаты передвижения колонн российской техники.

👍41

24 Aug 2022, 11:25 UTC≈8,240 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Нанесение артиллерией НМ ДНР ударов, в том числе с применением снарядов Краснополь, по огневым позициям ВСУ.

👍18👏2

24 Aug 2022, 09:16 UTC≈7,360 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Последствия очередного обстрела центра Донецка. Совсем недавно бродила всеми этими маршрутами с неуютным осознанием уязвимости, которое раньше посещало только во время поездок в прифронтовые районы. Фото друзей.

😢14🤬5👍41

23 Aug 2022, 18:49 UTC≈4,810 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

📹 Видео штурма укрепрайона ВСУ 11 полком НМ ДНР Бойцы 11 полка НМ ДНР после артподготовки провели решительный штурм одного из укрепрайонов ВСУ уничтожив при этом оказывавшего сопротивление противника.

👍18🔥7

23 Aug 2022, 13:15 UTC≈4,460 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

New York Times сообщает о подготовке Пентагоном ВСУ к наступлению. Это утверждение, издание основывает на «анализе последних поставок вооружения Киеву». А в него входят 40 бронетранспортеров, оснащенных катками для разминирования, а легкие 105-мм гаубицы и безоткатные орудия производства 60-х годов с дальностью стрельбы в несколько сотен метров, и первые модификации (70-х годов) ПТРК TOW. New York Times ссылается на

😁8👍3👏2

23 Aug 2022, 11:28 UTC≈3,640 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PushilinDenisVideo

По поводу сегодняшнего обстрела центра Донецка

👍7

23 Aug 2022, 10:52 UTC≈3,750 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

На фоне сегодняшнего обстрела хочется спросить коллег журналистское сообщество про зелёные, желтые и красные зоны. Если я в Песках - это зелёная или уже желтая? Кстати, все кому было стыдно в старомихайловке стендапить в бронежилетах потому что бабушки без бронежилетов - на кой хрен вы в центре Донецка теперь напяливаете на себя броню?

👍17

23 Aug 2022, 09:22 UTC≈3,580 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Побывал накануне в Александровке, Херсонской области. Село до боли напоминает Широкино. Бои за этот населенный пункт шли в апреле, в итоге отряды украинских боевиков и наемников были выбиты отсюда и отошли примерно на 5 км от населенного пункта. Практически все жители покинули Александровку, остались несколько стариков. ВСУ в свою очередь продолжают ежедневно бить по селу. Ещё в глаза бросаются расплющенные до состоя

😢14👍3

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Giazint_Z. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гиацинт” (@Giazint_Z), 663 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Giazint_Z.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.