Channel
@Gihad_313
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
217subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002996575040 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Gihad_313 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Gihad_313 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 217 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 210 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 207 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 206 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 206 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (26 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 85 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
24 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 95.8% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ما رأيت إلا جميلاً ... 🕊️ سارع في الإشتراك في القنوات فيسع قبل الحذف 👀 ✨🔥🔥🔥🏃🏻🏃🏻🏃🏻 ــ الاعلام اليمني🎥 ــ الغالبون ــ ⚡🇵🇸مخيم جنين الرعب🇵🇸⚡ ــ قـــنـــاة الـــمـــرحـــلـــة ــ بَصِيـرَةٌ 𓂆𖠲 جِــهَــآدْ ــ قناة صدى الصرخة ــ بسمات يمانيه ــ منصة صدى الجهاد ــ ريـــشــ🪶ـــة كــاتــبــــة ــ 🤍منهجيات جهادية 🤍 ــ سنرحـل ويبقـى الأثـر🇾🇪✌️🇵🇸 ــ الجهاد الإعلامي📸 ــ ✌️عشاق الشهادة✌️ ــ الإيمان يماني والحكمة يم…
اللهم في ليلة الجمعة، اجعل لنا من كل همٍّ فرجًا، ومن كل ضيقٍ مخرجًا، ومن كل بلاءٍ عافية، واغفر لنا ولوالدينا ولأحبتنا، وارزقنا سعادةً لا تزول، وقلبًا لا يحزن، ودعاءً لا يُرد، واجعل لنا نصيبًا من رحمتك ومغفرتك ورضوانك، واكتب لنا الخير حيث كان، ثم أرضِنا به. إنك على كل شيء قدير 🤍
﴿...وَليَتَلَطَّف وَلا يُشعِرَنَّ بِكُم أَحَدًا﴾ كلَّما كبرت حجم المشاكل في حياتك قاومها باللُّطف والهدوء والتأنِّي، فأصحاب الكهف حينما تلطَّفوا في حلِّ مشكلتهم سخَّر الله لهم الكون كله عضيدًا ومُناصراً.. فاللُّطف في مواطن الشدة من أخلاق الأنبياء والصالحين، فاستمسك به، فإنّ الله لطيفٌ بعباده، يجري أقداره بأخفى الأسباب وأعجبها♥️.
❤1
أعظم ما يطمئن القلب، أن الله لا ينسى خيرًا صنعتَه، ولا طاعةً أخلصتَ فيها له، فكلُّ خطوةٍ محفوظة، وكلُّ تعبٍ مأجور، وكلُّ عملٍ صالحٍ ستجده يومًا أمامك، ﴿وَمَن يَعمَل مِنَ الصّالِحاتِ وَهُوَ مُؤمِنٌ فَلا يَخافُ ظُلمًا وَلا هَضمًا﴾ ♥️.
❤1
كيف لهذه الحياة أن تهزمنا، والله معنا ؟! من أعظم العطايا الإلهية أن نوهب الثقة بالله في كُل أحوالنا؛ فنظل دائمًا على ترقبٍ لتبدل الحال إلى ما نؤمل: بعد الضيق سعة، وبعد السقم عافية، وبعد الغياب لقاء، فمن المحال دوام الحال؛ والذي قدّر الشدة بحكمته وعدله، قد هيأ المخارج بعلمه ورحمته، سبحانه♥️.
❤1
"عندما تتوقف حركة الأرض، تنزل هدايا السماء... لتضع ظلًا مألوفًا في الطريق، ولكنه ظل ينبض برحمة أوسع ويحمل قلبًا أكثر خضوعاً للخالق".✨🥀
https://t.me/Aljeeda93
• يا الله 🍃🤍
❤2
سكنتِ القلب، فصار أوسع من الأرض، وأضيق من أن يتّسع لغيرك..
❤2
🔸 سئل الإمام الحسين عليه السلام ، كيف أصبحت يا بن رسول الله ؟ فقال عليه السلام : أصبحت ولي ربَّ فوقي ، والنار أمامي ، والموت يطلبني ، والحساب محدق بي ، وأنا مرتَهَن بعملي ، لا أجد ما أحب ، ولا أدفع ما أكره ، والأمور بيد غيري ، فإن شاء عذبني وإن شاء عفا عني ، فأي فقير أفقر مني ؟ المصدر : أمالي الصدوق يومكم مبارك بطاعة الله سبحانه وتعالى وذكر الصلاة على محمد وآل محمد عليهم أفضل الصلاة وأتم التسليم
❤3
"أتساءلُ كيف سَتكون مَلامح الوصول حين تنجلي غيومُ التعب، هل سيبدو الأُفق مُشرِقًا، بعد كلّ تلك الخطىٰ الثّقيلة؟ هل يحمل الطريق بين طيّاته سلامًا بعد كلّ هذه الفوضىٰ؟".
❤2
Calm and refreshing vibes fill the room, where nature’s simplicity creates a dreamy green sanctuary.
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Gihad_313. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 312,230 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Gihad_313 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جـهـاد| 𓂆𖠲𝓙𝓲𝓱𝓪𝓭” (@Gihad_313), 217 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gihad_313.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.