Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Склад годноты

Channel

Склад годноты

@GodnoSklad

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,013subscribers

+71 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001557275351
TypeChannel
Username@GodnoSklad
Created8 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GodnoSklad

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,80023,08422,9426 August 2026 — 22,942 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,942 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,936 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,927 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,911 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,904 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,906 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,902 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,895 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,926 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,923 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,917 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,906 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,893 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,890 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,882 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,873 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,869 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,866 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,855 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,852 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,847 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,838 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,826 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,816 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,800 subscribers5 September 2026 — 22,920 subscribers8 September 2026 — 23,084 subscribers11 September 2026 — 23,079 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,055 subscribers15 September 2026 — 23,044 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,032 subscribers19 September 2026 — 23,013 subscribers23,0136 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net +71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,757–23,127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 07:0023,013-19
16 Sept 2026, 20:1823,032-12
15 Sept 2026, 01:0023,044-11
13 Sept 2026, 06:5923,055-24
11 Sept 2026, 06:3823,079-5
8 Sept 2026, 13:3623,084+164
5 Sept 2026, 09:2122,920+120
3 Sept 2026, 09:2622,800-16
2 Sept 2026, 03:2822,816-10
1 Sept 2026, 05:1622,826-12
31 Aug 2026, 06:1722,838-9
30 Aug 2026, 08:4622,847-5
29 Aug 2026, 07:1322,852-3
28 Aug 2026, 07:2422,855-11
27 Aug 2026, 09:5422,866-3
26 Aug 2026, 12:2622,869-4
25 Aug 2026, 11:1822,873-9
24 Aug 2026, 13:1822,882-8
22 Aug 2026, 19:1422,890-3
21 Aug 2026, 08:3522,893first reading

Engagement

367 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 23,013 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,810
110 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
110
of 367 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 109 of 110 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held367 (4 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total308,610
Reactions total6,406
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 12:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 07s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

20,658 reactions across 364 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁4,92623.8%
custom 54562894345152831284,37121.2%
4,20020.3%
custom 54539352899259016221,1325.48%
🥰9084.40%
😢9064.39%
💅6773.28%
❤‍🔥5992.90%
😎4572.21%
🤡4252.06%
💯3621.75%
🔥3071.49%
👍2511.22%
🌚2261.09%
💊2030.983%
👀1510.731%
🗿1220.591%
🤔1180.571%
🍌1140.552%
🦄760.368%
7 further kinds1270.615%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 364 of the 367 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,658 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 367 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 367 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GodnoSklad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 367 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.545%
2 of 367 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,710
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,820
over 365 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGwXwE9117 August 202617 August 2026
2W5zFHKQbiy129 August 202629 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 367 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC843 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥9👍3

3 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,060 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥8🔥21

3 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,380 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

8💊6😁6

3 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,750 views41 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5456289434515283128289👍2🔥1😁1

3 Sept 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,870 views65 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🌚38💯22🔥31custom 54562894345152831281

3 Sept 2026, 05:00 UTC≈1,970 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5456289434515283128141😢1

3 Sept 2026, 04:00 UTC≈2,160 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 5456289434515283128285

2 Sept 2026, 19:00 UTC≈2,450 views41 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥37😁4

2 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC≈2,540 views39 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5456289434515283128372

2 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈2,590 views52 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥27🤡13custom 54562894345152831286🥰31💅1💯1

2 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC≈2,790 views68 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁54custom 5456289434515283128104

Showing the 12 most recent of 367 posts we hold for @GodnoSklad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

СЛАВА БОГУ У НАС ЕСТЬ МЕМЫ
@SBUNEM · 26,882
#1
Абстрактные мемы для браузерных экономистов и стратегов всех сортов кажется
@realpotatonuts · 13,615
#2
HardMeme Cafe
@hardmemecafe · 9,129
#3
Мемные партизаны
@mem_prtizany · 16,564
#4
Высокоранговый бложик
@memy_meme · 12,149
#5
Tупи40k вахофага
@tupi40kwarhammer · 9,864
#6
Один последний мемас (One last meme)
@onelastmeme · 7,334
#7
Абу
@abuwtf · 209,837
#8
⚙️МемЗавод№7⚙️
@memzavod7 · 5,473
#9
Мемы на лопате
@lolpata · 2,482
#10
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,091,300
#11
Мемолог без опыта
@memscientist · 3,514
#12
Сатириконⸯ
@SatyriconMagazine · 5,769
#13
Ворованные мемы
@Stupidoldmemes · 6,620
#14
TES Memes
@SkyrimCh · 4,910
#15
Думайте.
@DumaiteMemes · 2,402
#16
XANDER_MEMES
@xandermemes · 5,944
#17
La Qeque
@LaQeque · 16,394
#18
ZLP™
@zalupepe · 3,365
#19
Gamer's Hut
@GamersHut · 1,946
#20
ради чего я живу
@memeforyousir · 9,849
#21
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,526
#22
Двач
@dvachannel · 938,773
#23
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 650,396
#24
ГОРИТ И ПАХНЕТ
@andflame · 8,924
#25
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693
#26
Грязное животное🏴‍☠
@Filthyanimal · 7,619
#27
Любовь не взаимна ❤️‍🩹
@not_in_love · 9,806
#28
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 332,521
#29
Мемный понедельник на каждый день
@rus_prikoldes · 7,151
#30
Тупа кволити контент
@skazochnoebalie · 22,813
#31
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,509
#32
Текстикулы
@Texticuless · 6,783
#33
Искушение святого Антония
@st_antony · 8,455
#34
Оскорбленное дворянство
@checkeredchannel · 10,879
#35
VG/Двач
@ru2chvg · 182,024
#36
Философия Говна
@govnoandcat · 11,784
#37
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,024
#38
Славянский зоопарк
@jabckomemes · 8,910
#39
Диск с приколами
@cdlulz · 8,005
#40
Katzen und Politik
@Katzen_und_Politik · 11,732
#41
Ириш, алё
@aleirisha · 3,111
#42
Министерство Мемов
@memasiz · 7,052
#43
Волт-Мем
@vaultmem · 4,989
#44
Густопсовые мемы
@gustopsach · 15,198
#45
Баба с яйцами и мемами
@Baba_s_yajcami_i_memami · 11,438
#46
ШИЗОЙДЫ НАХУЙ
@shizoidsnahui · 5,102
#47
Улыбнись, за€бал
@smilemilf · 8,163
#48
Саша Конь
@sashakon · 131,669
#49
первой эякулирует бухгалтерия
@buhcumlter · 36,947
#50
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ
@svtvnews · 113,037
#51
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 431,305
#52
Пикчи разной степени абсурдности
@picchiiiiii · 7,135
#53
Dankest Memes // Данкест Мемс
@thedankestmemes · 45,818
#54
Мемные мародёры
@mmaroders · 6,452
#55
Мои любимые юморески
@myfavoritejumoreski · 79,457
#56
конспирологические мемы
@reptilememe · 13,424
#57
ØБLАСТНЫЕ🔪
@oblasnoy_i · 4,460
#58

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Анекдоты категории Б
@baneksru · 49,672
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
СЛАВА БОГУ У НАС ЕСТЬ МЕМЫ
@SBUNEM · 26,882
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 September 2026
ТупичокДеграданта
@tupi4ek_degradanta · 75,406
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
кхе-кхе
@khekkhe · 21,487
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 September 2026
Games WebM
@gamewebm · 26,339
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 September 2026
Святой отец
@svyatoy_otec_memes · 35,589
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Склад годноты” (@GodnoSklad), 23,013 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GodnoSklad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.