Channel
@GogolNikolaiSetochka
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
340subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002808595505 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GogolNikolaiSetochka |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GogolNikolaiSetochka |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 340 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 345 | +44 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 301 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 299 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 299 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
891 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5224388310364858874 | 221 | 24.8% | |
| 👻 | 175 | 19.6% | |
| custom 5321368135037629879 | 172 | 19.3% | |
| custom 5355069407674506651 | 167 | 18.7% | |
| 🕊 | 128 | 14.4% | |
| 😨 | 13 | 1.46% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 1.12% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.561% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 891 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GogolNikolaiSetochka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
°°° /∆\ /∆\ {💭} /∆\ /∆\ °°° Ааа, и кстати, о зависимостях! Бывали умники, завистливо предполагающие, что чтобы без колебаний проливать кровь, мне обязательно нужно напихивать себя наркотой и всяким подобным мусором. Какая прелестная, какая наивная чушь. 🎭 /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\
👻27custom 535506940767450665113custom 52243883103648588749custom 53213681350376298791
°°° /∆\ /∆\ {❔} /∆\ /∆\ °°° Как относитесь к различным зависимостям, к примеру, о веществ Примитивнейшая слабость ведущая подчас к примитивнейшей смерти. 🎭 Здравствуйте, Николай. Любите звёзды? В том числе реальные. Форму звезды? «Не слышим люди, мы, плача звезды далёкой. Ведь как она красива, так и одинока.» ~ Почему нет?) Говорят, желания исполняют, так за что ж их не любить! Коля-Коля, привет. Как дела? Люби…
👻22🕊10custom 53213681350376298796custom 52243883103648588742custom 53550694076745066511
°°° /∆\ /∆\ {💭} /∆\ /∆\ °°° Я всё-ë ещё думаю, куда в итоге-то делся этот злосчастный яд? Тот паренёк сидел рядом и дезактивировал всё это дело за секунду до? Но где он тогда?? Всё, тю? 🌟 /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\
👻27custom 53213681350376298799custom 53550694076745066518custom 52243883103648588741
Sticker, posted without a caption
👻12custom 53550694076745066512
Хах, боже. Кто-то из моих указал мне на этот канал. Отдалённо одинаковые черты лица с ним значат и одинаковую способность? Пф, зачем тогда хотеть умереть, если не позволяешь другим помочь себе умереть????
custom 532136813503762987923👻9🕊8
ОН.... ОН ПРОСТО ВСТАЛ И УШЁЛ?!????!?
custom 532136813503762987934😨5👻4
Ууууааа, кажется уже начинается!!!
custom 532136813503762987927👻8
°°° /∆\ /∆\ {💭} /∆\ /∆\ °°° Шанс того что случайно встреченный в парке человек окажется отчаявшимся суицидником никогда не равен нулю! Только представьте: бедняга, уже решивший покончить с жизнью, никак не может заставить себя проглотить яд. Ахх, какая беда. 🎭 Не будь я глубоко сострадательным, заботливым и добрым человеком наверняка бы просто прошёл мимо. Что ж!!! Чтобы н…
custom 522438831036485887431🤯7custom 53550694076745066516
°°° /∆\ /∆\ {💭} /∆\ /∆\ °°° Крупицы правды, поданные под правильным углом будут куда действеннее грубой лжи. Важнейший навык для иллюзиониста – Правильно о б м а н у т ь. И наилучшим образом обманет он только тогда, когда начнет сам верить в свои трюки. 🎭 /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\
🕊40custom 522438831036485887414custom 53213681350376298796custom 53550694076745066514
Ха!! Но планы Фёдора зачастую сами по себе огибают законы, и не только твоего Казино. Как и, очевидно, их участники. Неужели ты забыл?)
custom 535506940767450665134custom 532136813503762987910custom 52243883103648588745🕊1🤯1
Крооо-ме ме-няяя! 🎭 А, и ещё кое-кого.
custom 522438831036485887432custom 532136813503762987911custom 53550694076745066519🕊1
°°° /∆\ /∆\ {💭} /∆\ /∆\ °°° Федю перевернуть у меня не получилось, а переворачиваться самому очень губительно для здоровья, как видите, ух!! Аж в глазах поплыло. И дааа, там у нас назревает одно важное дельце, мне бы в любом случае больше б не разрешили ещё так вот посвисать с потолка. /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\ /∆\
🕊34👻5custom 53213681350376298795custom 52243883103648588742custom 53550694076745066511
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GogolNikolaiSetochka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“°Николай Гоголь°” (@GogolNikolaiSetochka), 340 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GogolNikolaiSetochka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.