
Channel
ππππΏ ππππ ππππ β’οΈ
@GoldPipscounterman11
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
6,889subscribers
-139 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002074930554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GoldPipscounterman11 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GoldPipscounterman11 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 6,889 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 6,896 | -42 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 6,938 | +14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 6,924 | -39 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 6,963 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 6,973 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:59 | 6,983 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 6,983 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:39 | 6,999 | -22 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 7,021 | -9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 7,030 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 7,024 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 7,030 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 7,028 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured β we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@signal_forex5 Β· 135,311
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 52 here β alongside 51 others β read 12 August 2026
@Tratimetotrade Β· 28,542
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 57 here β alongside 56 others β read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππππΏ ππππ ππππ β’οΈβ (@GoldPipscounterman11), 6,889 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoldPipscounterman11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.