Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for «گلد مانی | Gold Money»

Channel

«گلد مانی | Gold Money»

@Gold_Mooney

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

100,727subscribers

+86,720 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002175671263
TypeChannel
Username@Gold_Mooney
Description🥇 GOLD MONEY | گلد مانی 📊 تحلیل و سیگنال تخصصی XAUUSD & Forex 🎯 ورود دقیق | مدیریت سرمایه | سبک معاملاتی اختصاصی 📈 تحلیل روزانه و دید حرفه‌ای به بازار 💬 پشتیبانی ۲۴/۷ 📞 Support: @sina_supporttt 📞 Support: @sina_supporttt
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Gold_Mooney

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,007100,72757,36727 August 2026 — 14,007 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,212 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,866 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,751 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,132 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,500 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,521 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,175 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,494 subscribers8 September 2026 — 18,679 subscribers11 September 2026 — 85,084 subscribers13 September 2026 — 87,729 subscribers14 September 2026 — 85,034 subscribers16 September 2026 — 82,798 subscribers18 September 2026 — 100,727 subscribers27 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 23 days, net +86,720. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 999–113,735 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:37100,727+17,929
16 Sept 2026, 08:1882,798-2,236
14 Sept 2026, 13:2085,034-2,695
13 Sept 2026, 02:3887,729+2,645
11 Sept 2026, 05:5585,084+66,405
8 Sept 2026, 12:1918,679+185
5 Sept 2026, 06:0118,494-681
3 Sept 2026, 09:0619,175-346
2 Sept 2026, 01:2419,521+1,021
1 Sept 2026, 03:0318,500+1,368
30 Aug 2026, 23:0717,132+381
29 Aug 2026, 23:3716,751+885
28 Aug 2026, 20:2415,866+654
27 Aug 2026, 23:5415,212+1,205
27 Aug 2026, 00:4514,007first reading

Engagement

351 posts held, back to 26 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.87%
avg views ÷ 100,727 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,890
350 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
351
of 351 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 138 of 350 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held351 (26 August 202621 September 2026)
Views total1,010,604
Reactions total34,042
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 12:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
372
Videos
3
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

34,042 reactions across 136 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23,84970.1%
👍4,76314.0%
🔥2,4657.24%
🏆1,2223.59%
💯5901.73%
🕊3491.03%
👎2040.599%
👏1460.429%
💘1140.335%
😁950.279%
🫡910.267%
🆒830.244%
🍾570.167%
🥰130.038%
🐳10.003%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 138 of the 351 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,042 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 351 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,750 views5 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

امروز میخواستیم اینو بگیریم، اول بای رفتیم بالا ، بعد به سل شک کردم که نشد بهتون بدن، و برای بای اخر دقیق لحظه ای که گفتم اماده باش ، ورودش از دست رفت

4🐳1

21 Sept 2026, 14:09 UTC≈3,530 views3 reactionsread 22 September 2026

4314 & 4319 از نزدیکش ترید شد پر ریسک شد

3

21 Sept 2026, 13:57 UTC≈2,970 views1 reactionsread 22 September 2026

در مورد پوزیشن قبلی از 4351 170 پیپ ترید شد و از 4357 100 پیپ

1

21 Sept 2026, 13:56 UTC≈2,830 viewsread 22 September 2026

اگر این لعنتی را میزدیم . رفت و برگشتی زده بودیمششاااااااااا

21 Sept 2026, 13:46 UTC≈2,550 views2 reactionsread 22 September 2026

اصلا شک کردم توی ترید اشتباه هست . باید زدش یا استاپ یا تیپی

2

21 Sept 2026, 13:43 UTC684 viewsread 22 September 2026

فووووری 🚨 تمام هواپیمایی های ایران تحریم شد!! وزیر خزانه‌داری امریکا گفت: در تاریخ ۲۳ سپتامبر، تمامی خطوط هوایی ایران در سراسر جهان متوقف خواهند شد!

Showing the 12 most recent of 351 posts we hold for @Gold_Mooney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

در مورد ترید کانال نظرت به کدوم سبک هست؟ پر ریسک و تمام اعداد را بزنیم جه استاپ و چه تیپی همراه هست، یا کم ریسک ( فقط اعداد مهم )

  1. پر ریسک ( همه را بزنیم )50%
  2. کم ریسک ( فقط اعداد مهم )50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 351 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“«گلد مانی | Gold Money»” (@Gold_Mooney), 100,727 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gold_Mooney.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.