Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 35 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,603–1,632 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 12:20
1,606
-7
6 Sept 2026, 16:58
1,613
-2
2 Sept 2026, 03:23
1,615
-3
30 Aug 2026, 10:33
1,618
-4
27 Aug 2026, 02:46
1,622
-5
20 Aug 2026, 00:11
1,627
-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:43
1,628
-1
13 Aug 2026, 10:06
1,629
+13
10 Aug 2026, 11:24
1,616
+4
7 Aug 2026, 16:48
1,612
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:41
1,612
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
47s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
656 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
556
84.8%
custom 5233567011958697078
25
3.81%
custom 5235478122081560535
25
3.81%
👍
15
2.29%
🔥
13
1.98%
❤🔥
12
1.83%
custom 5235728802142759605
4
0.61%
😎
2
0.305%
🌚
1
0.152%
💋
1
0.152%
😁
1
0.152%
🙏
1
0.152%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 656 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Gridzentg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
1. Все, что произошло в замке имеет логическое объяснение. Мистики не существует!22%
2. БОльшую часть можно легко объяснить… но не все… я оставляю шанс необъяснимому26%
3. Я считаю, что звуки в Зале для вступления в контакт можно объяснить! А вот пирамиду… нет17%
4. Это все были ПРИЗРАКИ, ёпта😂59%
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Любители 👻, внимание ‼️
Как вам возвращение в тот самый Замок с привидениями во Франции (надеюсь, что этот не сгорит!)
Я не собирался выпускать из этого места полноценный ролик… но в моменте съемки происходил какой-то П***Ц!🤯
Как вы думаете, у всего этого есть логическое объяснение?
Если не понимаете, о чем идёт речь, то у меня на YouTube канале НОВЫЙ страшный ролик! Ссылка: https://youtu.be/Fc35cbmhjCo?is=O0TKjIWx-…
Контент подъехал👻 Я вернулся в тот самый Замок с привидениями, где провёл 3 ночи и снимал Гостбастер!
Это был один из самых сочных выпусков за всю историю моего YouTube канала🤯
И спустя три года я вновь оказался в этом страшном месте, чтобы понять, что же тогда происходило на видео…
Вопросов стало ещё больше!
Ссылка на ролик: https://youtu.be/Fc35cbmhjCo?is=yTGkkMo_Ddp8N9Jz
Ребятки! Новый ролик на канале ⬇️
Оч важна ваша поддержка, особенно на первых порах.
Дальше больше! Стараемся из-зо всех сил 🫶
https://youtu.be/xgguOlun6f8
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Gridzentg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
1. Все, что произошло в замке имеет логическое объяснение. Мистики не существует!22%
2. БОльшую часть можно легко объяснить… но не все… я оставляю шанс необъяснимому26%
3. Я считаю, что звуки в Зале для вступления в контакт можно объяснить! А вот пирамиду… нет17%
4. Это все были ПРИЗРАКИ, ёпта😂59%
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вера Бонд 🖤 @vera_bond007 · 88,554 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
Никита Сударь ТГК @sudarchnl · 63,642 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GRIDZEN” (@Gridzentg), 1,606 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gridzentg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
