Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net +1,747. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,318–3,589 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 14:00
3,327
+39
12 Sept 2026, 06:16
3,288
+187
8 Sept 2026, 05:22
3,101
+408
3 Sept 2026, 10:29
2,693
+206
31 Aug 2026, 08:13
2,487
+177
28 Aug 2026, 08:07
2,310
+65
25 Aug 2026, 00:36
2,245
+110
21 Aug 2026, 02:53
2,135
+80
17 Aug 2026, 18:13
2,055
+107
14 Aug 2026, 19:19
1,948
+78
11 Aug 2026, 14:22
1,870
+289
8 Aug 2026, 06:07
1,581
+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:18
1,580
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:26
1,580
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,505 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,505
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,505 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
63
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 19 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
41
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Grisha_Youtuber_2003. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всех кто ведёт или планирует вести свой Телеграм-канал / Экспертный блог про Ютуб — приглашаю сюда
Буду писать вам как вести и что постить — процентов 90 тг-каналов ведутся откровенно ХУЕВО, вы будете расти сильно быстрее них.
БЕСПЛАТНО — потом как-нибудь рекламных постиков сделаете пожилому человеку и всё на этом
Всех кого знаю принимаю сразу, у кого со мной нет переписки — кидайте пруфы, извините, экспертности в…
Пост про промпты — н-н-н-надо? 🚬
Разберём КАК делать промпты для сценариев, КАКИЕ промпты, приведу конкретные ПРИМЕРЫ
400 лайков 👍 под этот пост и расписываю. А пока — кто не видел закреп — можете почитать на канале про:
Информацию новичкам
Метод поиска ниш
Список лучших и худших Ютуб-Комьюнити
Много инфы по старту и ведению каналов
Какими нейронками писать сюжет / сценарий видосов
Как стартовать каналы эффек…
Я же еще не ебаться в рот какой программист 👌 — сделал скрипт который субтитры создаёт
Просто у всех сервисов озвучки кривые субтитры, хоть с паузами хоть без делай — рассинхрон. А в капкате они долго делаются и без пунктуации
https://mellifluous-jelly-efcdae.netlify.app/
Кидаете mp3 / mp4 и получаете SRT-субтитры (с таймингами) — достаточно быстро и без косяков (бесплатный ключ ассембли понадобится — там есть инф…
Решая какую задачу новички (да и не новички) слушают людей которые не зарабатывают на ютубе?
Ну, например заходят в приватки к ребятам без своих каналов, спрашивают советов у нонеймов в бесплатных чатах и так далее
Разве шанс получить профит от разбирающихся в теме людей — меньше?
Ладно, задавайте любые вопросы по Ютубу в комментариях
На 100 вопросов под этим постом запишу вам видос с ответами 🫡
Только че-нибудь интересное, что еще не разбирали. "Старичкам" мб что-то интересно?
Как быстро ставить каналы на монетизацию и долго держать на них трафик
За такую инфу люди обычно платят немалые ДЕНЬГИ 😳
На картинке выше описана приоритетность задач, приводящих наши каналы к своей непосредственной цели — зарабатыванию просмотров и соответственно ДЕНЕГ
Разбираем предметно:
Ключевое — ниша.
Как бы качественно вы не вели мусорную тематику — системно зарабатывать на таком канале не получится, даже е…
Ну вот статка одного из новых каналов, почти 2000$ за 4 дня на монете🚬
Делал его по:
Схема 1
схема 2
На бурже кстати зарабатывать раз в 10 проще чем на ру😳
Как стартануть канал заведомо успешнее конкурентов🚬
Этой методой я пользуюсь буквально уже больше года — осечек не было и не будет.
Напоминаю, что главное это ниша, и нет оснований делать еще несуществующую или переспамленную тематику. Выбирайте на ведение те, которые стремятся обладать 2 условиями:
а. с большими просмотрами за недавнее время
б. с малым количеством конкурентов в языке
Итак, сам метод достаточно п…
Первый день этих каналов на монете: немного — потому что приняли их только под вечер, но уже пол косаря $
Ниши — нашел через эту методу
Вести их начал способом про который ниже делал пост — чтобы гарантированно пошли, быстро встали на монетизацию и не просели по трафу
Больше недели не было постов — ездили на дачу🚬
Пока отдыхали запустил 2 новых канала и левой пяткой вёл их по 30 минут в день. Стата — радует, рпм 15
Там условия выполнены понятно за пару дней, гораздо дольше ждать ёбань с адиками и одобрением монеты и апилок
👍127
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Grisha_Youtuber_2003. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гриша Ютубер” (@Grisha_Youtuber_2003), 3,327 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Grisha_Youtuber_2003.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.