XX.09.2026 Poland๐ต๐ฑ Arrange fight, U18. GKS Jastrzฤbie vs Ostrovia Ostrรณw. 5x5. 1,15 min. Win. GKS Jastrzฤbie
๐5โค1

Channel
@GruppaOF_arrangefight
On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
12,611subscribers
+638 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002270399767 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GruppaOF_arrangefight |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GruppaOF_arrangefight |
Sports โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
15,900 average views per post against 12,611 subscribers โ an engagement rate of 126.2%. Across the 4,953 registered channels in the same cohort โ 10,000โ31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in English โ the middle half sit between 1.74% and 9.79%, with a median of 4.87%.
| Window | 30 days (26 August 2026 โ 25 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 190,930 |
| Mature posts only | 136.5% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 12,611 measured 18 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:eng ยท 4,953 channels ยท p10 0.446% ยท p25 1.74% ยท p50 4.87% ยท p75 9.79% ยท p90 17.0% |
| Position in cohort | 99.919th percentile ยท 25.9ร the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ยฑ0.232% of the figure, from Telegramโs rounding |
| Post language | English ยท 100.0% of the windowโs posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3ร away from that cohortโs median โ above it โ on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes โ audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelโs own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 25 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 12,611 | -2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 12,613 | +12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 12,601 | +48 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 12,553 | +5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 12,548 | +94 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 12,454 | +22 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 12,432 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:26 | 12,431 | +9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:05 | 12,422 | +10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 12,412 | +43 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 12,369 | +223 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 12,146 | +7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 12,139 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 12,141 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 12,143 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 12,140 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 12,138 | +37 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 12,101 | +10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 12,091 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 12,089 | first reading |
52 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (10 July 2026 โ 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 190,930 |
| Reactions total | 473 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
2,438 reactions across 52 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 779 | 32.0% | |
| ๐ฅ | 773 | 31.7% | |
| ๐ | 271 | 11.1% | |
| ๐ | 155 | 6.36% | |
| ๐ | 109 | 4.47% | |
| ๐ | 71 | 2.91% | |
| ๐ | 38 | 1.56% | |
| ๐ | 35 | 1.44% | |
| ๐ซก | 32 | 1.31% | |
| ๐ | 30 | 1.23% | |
| ๐ | 17 | 0.697% | |
| ๐ฑ | 17 | 0.697% | |
| ๐ | 16 | 0.656% | |
| ๐ค | 13 | 0.533% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 12 | 0.492% | |
| โก | 11 | 0.451% | |
| ๐ญ | 8 | 0.328% | |
| ๐ฏ | 8 | 0.328% | |
| ๐ | 8 | 0.328% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 0.246% | |
| 13 further kinds | 29 | 1.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 2,438 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
XX.09.2026 Poland๐ต๐ฑ Arrange fight, U18. GKS Jastrzฤbie vs Ostrovia Ostrรณw. 5x5. 1,15 min. Win. GKS Jastrzฤbie
๐5โค1
XX.08.2026 Arrange ultras fight. Standard de Liรจge (UI96๐ง๐ช) vs Antwerp๐ง๐ช ๐ค๐ผ Tilburg๐ณ๐ฑ. 30x30. 1,20 min. Win. Antwerp ๐ค๐ผ Tilburg Info Antwerp: Much respect to Standard for the invitation!
โค57๐ฅ5๐2๐1
XX.08.2026 Arrange fight for the 30th anniversary of Ultras Inferno 1996. Standard (UI96๐ง๐ช) vs Antwerp๐ง๐ช ๐ค๐ผ Tilburg๐ณ๐ฑ. 30x30. 1,20 min. Win Antwerp ๐ค๐ผ Tilburg ๐ธ Ultras Inferno 1996 Info Antwerp: Much respect to Standard for the invitation!
โค46๐ฅ9๐1
XX.08.2026 France๐ซ๐ท Arrange fight, U23 Imbuvables Toulon vs Indep Guinguamp. 7x7. 1,50 min. Win. Toulon
โค19๐ฅ5๐3๐1๐1
XX.08.2026 France๐ซ๐ท Arrange fight, U23 Imbuvables Toulon vs Indep Guinguamp. 7x7. 1,50 min. Win. Toulon
โค25๐7๐5๐1๐1
ะฅะฅ.08.2026 Kazakhstan๐ฐ๐ฟ Arrange fight, U19. Frozen Front (Ertish, white) vs 04 RWC (Aktobe, red). 7x7. 45 sec. Win. Aktobe
๐ซก16๐ฅ10๐5๐4๐ญ1๐1
29.08.2026 Russia๐ท๐บ Arrange fight. Young Red White Night (Spartak Kostroma) vs C.D.W. (Tekstilshik Ivanovo). 4x4. 30 sec. Win. Kostroma
๐69โค12๐7๐5๐ฏ3๐ฅ3๐2
XX.08.2026 France๐ซ๐ท Arrange fight. Brigade Arverne (Clermont-Ferrand) vs French Team. 5x5. 50 sec. Win. Brigade Arverne Info French Team: Thanks for acceptation in short notice Info Brigade Arverne: Thanks for fair fight
๐ฅ28๐4โค1๐1
XX.08.2026 Arrange fight, U21. Lierse๐ง๐ช vs Waalwijk๐ณ๐ฑ ๐ค Westerlo๐ง๐ช. 5x5. 20 sec. Win. Lierse
โค18๐ฅ4๐1
XX.08.2026 Sweden๐ธ๐ช Arrange fight. Boxbrรถder (Halmstad, white) vs Red Alliance (Kalmar, black). 5x5. Win. BBH Halmstad
๐ซก8โค2๐ฅ2๐1
XX.08.2026 Kazakhstan ๐ฐ๐ฟ Arrange fight. Kok-Sary (Astana) vs Capital Brigade (Jenis). 6x6. 45 sec. Win. Jenis ๐ธ Capital Brigade (Jenis)
๐ฅ15๐9๐6๐3โค1๐ฏ1
XX.08.2026 Kazakhstan ๐ฐ๐ฟ Arrange fight. Kok-Sary (Astana) vs Capital Brigade (Jenis). 6x6. 45 sec. Win. Jenis
๐ฅ20๐7๐5๐3
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @GruppaOF_arrangefight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@GruppaOF_arrangefight edited 1 post after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ข๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ด๐ณ๐โ (@GruppaOF_arrangefight), 12,611 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GruppaOF_arrangefight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.