Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Guarda Community

Supergroup

Guarda Community

@Guarda_community

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

4,158members

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

146 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001140906717
TypeSupergroup
Username@Guarda_community
CreatedBetween 1 June 2016 and 31 January 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded4 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Guarda_community

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,1424,1704,1566 August 2026 — 4,157 members6 August 2026 — 4,163 members9 August 2026 — 4,167 members12 August 2026 — 4,156 members16 August 2026 — 4,145 members19 August 2026 — 4,148 members21 August 2026 — 4,142 members24 August 2026 — 4,148 members27 August 2026 — 4,149 members30 August 2026 — 4,156 members3 September 2026 — 4,165 members4 September 2026 — 4,165 members8 September 2026 — 4,170 members12 September 2026 — 4,166 members15 September 2026 — 4,158 members4,1586 August 202615 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 40 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,138–4,174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
15 Sept 2026, 20:404,158-8
12 Sept 2026, 11:594,166-4
8 Sept 2026, 15:384,170+5
4 Sept 2026, 22:314,165no change
3 Sept 2026, 09:384,165+9
30 Aug 2026, 22:154,156+7
27 Aug 2026, 15:454,149+1
24 Aug 2026, 23:024,148+6
21 Aug 2026, 18:294,142-6
19 Aug 2026, 01:064,148+3
16 Aug 2026, 05:124,145-11
12 Aug 2026, 21:174,156-11
9 Aug 2026, 23:334,167+4
6 Aug 2026, 19:204,163+6
6 Aug 2026, 08:484,157first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Guarda Community” (@Guarda_community), 4,158 members as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Guarda_community.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.