Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Великие хранители Gerand

Channel

Великие хранители Gerand

@Guardians_of_Gerand

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,963subscribers

+223 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002023341537
TypeChannel
Username@Guardians_of_Gerand
Description👋 Добро пожаловать в наше фанатское сообщество, посвященное Gerand'y (и не только) Здесь публикуются разборы серий, новости, эксклюзивы и многое другое. 📩 Предложка совместного канала: t.me/Guardians_of_Gerand?direct 🔷 Состоим в АТС 🔷
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Guardians_of_Gerand

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,5916,0055,79824 August 2026 — 5,740 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,739 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,723 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,714 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,710 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,695 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,668 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,660 subscribers25 September 2026 — 5,645 subscribers4 October 2026 — 5,608 subscribers10 October 2026 — 5,595 subscribers14 October 2026 — 5,591 subscribers17 October 2026 — 5,984 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,005 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,002 subscribers26 October 2026 — 5,990 subscribers29 October 2026 — 5,973 subscribers1 November 2026 — 5,995 subscribers4 November 2026 — 5,963 subscribers5,96324 August 20264 November 2026
19 measurements spanning 72 days, net +223. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,529–6,067 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 10:395,963-32
1 Nov 2026, 03:385,995+22
29 Oct 2026, 10:375,973-17
26 Oct 2026, 10:275,990-12
23 Oct 2026, 14:266,002-3
20 Oct 2026, 09:566,005+21
17 Oct 2026, 15:065,984+393
14 Oct 2026, 07:115,591-4
10 Oct 2026, 14:385,595-13
4 Oct 2026, 22:185,608-37
25 Sept 2026, 17:405,645-15
16 Sept 2026, 21:595,660-8
13 Sept 2026, 08:385,668-27
9 Sept 2026, 04:005,695-15
3 Sept 2026, 23:185,710-4
31 Aug 2026, 13:075,714-9
28 Aug 2026, 03:425,723-16
25 Aug 2026, 04:395,739-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:155,740first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.4%
avg views ÷ 5,963 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,660
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held33 (12 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total58,540
Reactions total1,746
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 02:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,210
Videos
≈789
Links
≈1,390

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
50s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,550 reactions across 32 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,00656.5%
👍53415.0%
👎2446.87%
🔥2396.73%
🏆1724.85%
🫡952.68%
👀551.55%
😁270.761%
👏210.592%
🥰190.535%
😢170.479%
❤‍🔥140.394%
🌚130.366%
🥴130.366%
🤣120.338%
🥱90.254%
🤔80.225%
💔70.197%
🐳50.141%
💋50.141%
16 further kinds350.986%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,550 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 32 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Guardians_of_Gerand. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (17.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 10:07 UTC≈1,430 views54 reactionsread 5 November 2026

📱 На нашем новом YouTube-канале ВХГ совместно с Алластополисом вышел первый видеоразбор серии Геранда! Это только начало! В планах — активно развивать YouTube-направление и радовать вас не только интересным контентом в Telegram ,но и новыми видео на YouTube. 🔗 Смотреть первый видеоразбор: https://youtu.be/X-PFOD8M1yM?si=gAYZpvNnwWKWPPQO 💛 Поддержите нас подпиской на новый канал! 🤩 ВХГ | Подписаться

❤44🔥9👎1

3 Nov 2026, 19:04 UTC≈1,780 views55 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🌞 Уважаемые читатели, наш телеграмм канал ищет талантливых фотоделов, способных создавать качественные превью! 💬 По всем вопросам писать: @Allostopolis 🤩 ВХГ | Подписаться

❤47👍7🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,930 views97 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

💚 В четверг выходит мощная серия про КВ-6 🥹 и Левиафана 😏 🤔 Что же предпримет Левиафан/Немцы против него? #анонс 🤩 ВХГ | Подписаться

🏆77❤13👍6😈1

2 Nov 2026, 18:16 UTC≈2,190 views77 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

💚 ➿ Разбор новой серии про СССР 👋 Приветствую 0,01% аудитории Геранда, сегодня мы с вами поговорим о том, что произошло в серии. Что вышло хорошо, что плохо, а что и вовсе нелепо. Приятного просмотра. Серия поделена на 3 арки: хандра Квч, флэшбеки Т-35 и телодвижения СПК. Пойдём же мы по хронологии самой серии. Начинается серия с демонстрации Квч, который читает старую книгу времён Российской империи. Книга вероят…

👍56❤12❤‍🔥2🌚2🏆2👌2😁1

Signed 𝙄 𝙖𝙢_𝙁𝙚𝙙𝙤𝙧☭

30 Oct 2026, 16:05 UTC≈3,530 views57 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @AllostopolisBack

🔍 ИЩЕМ АНИМАТОРОВ! Наш ТГК находится в поиске аниматоров-эдиторов, способных создавать шортс контент для ютуб канала! Если ты активный, творческий, хочешь стать частью нашей команды и заниматься созданием шортсов и иного контента – будем рады видеть тебя среди нас! По всем вопросам обращаться к @Allostopolis

👀47❤9🗿1

Signed Илья

29 Oct 2026, 17:47 UTC≈3,710 views76 reactionsread 5 November 2026

💚 А мы продолжаем делать эксклюзивный контент для ВК-группы 📱: на этот раз мы выложили разбор про средневековье. Ссылка на сам разбор прилагается: https://vk.ru/wall-214759917_11574 🤩 ВХГ | Подписаться

🏆59❤12🤯4🗿1

29 Oct 2026, 09:32 UTC≈3,860 views114 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

💚 Завтра (пятница) - новая серия про СССР 🤔 Что же собирается делать КВ-Ч? Новый костюм? Или возьмётся за модернизацию себя? #анонс. 🤩 ВХГ | Подписаться

❤98🏆9👍6🗿1

28 Oct 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,740 views130 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

💫 Четырёхлетие судьбоносной встречи Сегодня, в этот же день 4 года назад, 28 октября Генерал Мс-1 🤩 нашёл Кв-44 😡 в мире Заточения. Эта встреча кардинальным образом повлияла на сюжет, именно благодаря Мс-1 😰 Кв-44 🙄 сумел добраться до СССР и спасти недавно отбитую Москву в тяжёлый для неё час. 🤔 А как вы относитесь к Мс-1 🤩 ? Герой ли он? Антигерой? Натуральный злодей для СССР? ✍️ Автор: @Nagito_10 💛 ВХГ | Подпис

❤111❤‍🔥8🔥6🫡3🥰1😁1

25 Oct 2026, 15:55 UTC≈4,420 views85 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Что за аниматор? | Шоу Тенкс 🩵 Спустя очень долгий перерыв рад снова приветствовать на пожалуй моей любимой рубрике «Что за аниматор?». Гвоздём сегодняшней программы будет Шоу Тенкс 🩵, которого я пытался посмотреть на протяжении где-то года. И аниматор этот крайне необычный... Шоу Тенкс 🩵 – довольно старый ТМ аниматор, но с несколькими нюансами. Первые годы своей ютуб карьеры качество серий было ну... Вы поняли. П…

❤69🥱6✍4🔥2🍓1👎1💔1😐1

24 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTC≈4,490 views108 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Разбор новой серии Геранда💚 Приветствую всех на очередном разборе. Сразу хочется сказать, что тенденция пошла удручающая 😔, уже вторая серия подряд выходит хуже предыдущей, хотя и серия от которой ведётся отсчёт любовью 💛 0,01% аудитории Геранда не наделена, и на мой взгляд заслуженно. Вышедшая же серия... Пустая? Я когда посмотрел изначально даже не понял что разбирать буду. Ну типо у нас 2 части, в первой Мефику …

❤96🌚6💯3🎄1👍1🥰1

23 Oct 2026, 11:33 UTC≈3,750 views302 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🆕 В новой серии нам показали обновлённый облик Мефистополя! 💬 Понравился ли он вам? 💛 ВХГ | Подписаться

👎211❤47👍16🤣8🤔7🌚4👏3😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @Guardians_of_Gerand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Великие хранители Gerand” (@Guardians_of_Gerand), 5,963 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Guardians_of_Gerand.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.