[Идᴇᴛ нᴀбᴏᴩ ʙ ᴀдʍины!] ❌➰🩸➰❌➰🩸➰❌➰🩸➰❌➰🩸➰❌ - нᴇᴦдᴇ ʙыᴄᴋᴀɜᴀᴛь ᴛᴏ ᴋᴀᴋ ᴛы ᴋᴏᴦᴏ-ᴛᴏ нᴇнᴀʙидиɯь? - Нᴇᴋᴏʍу ᴩᴀᴄᴄᴋᴀɜᴀᴛь ᴋᴀᴋ ᴛᴇбя бᴇᴄиᴛ чᴛᴏ-ᴛᴏ? - хᴏчᴇɯь ᴩᴀᴄᴄᴋᴀɜᴀᴛь ᴨᴩᴏ ᴩᴀɜдᴩᴀжᴀющую иᴄᴛᴏᴩию? Дᴏбᴩᴏ ᴨᴏжᴀᴧᴏʙᴀᴛь ʙ... ᕼᗩTE « EᐯEᖇYTᕼIᑎG » ᑕOᑎᖴESSIOᑎ Мᴇᴄᴛᴏ, ᴦдᴇ ᴛы ʍᴏжᴇɯь ᴩᴀᴄᴄᴋᴀɜᴀᴛь ᴏ ᴄʙᴏᴇй нᴇнᴀʙиᴄᴛи ᴋ чᴇʍу-ᴧибᴏ! Зᴀинᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄᴏʙᴀᴧи?! Зᴀхᴏди! Кᴧиᴋни чᴛᴏбы ɜᴀйᴛи! ❌➰🩸➰❌➰🩸➰❌➰🩸➰❌➰🩸➰❌ Нᴀʙиᴦᴀция | ВП[20+/10+] | нᴀ…

Channel
— Kazuscara hate confession
@HATEkdzscr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
289subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003639576267 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HATEkdzscr |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HATEkdzscr |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 289 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:06 | 293 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 297 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 295 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 293 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 293 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
279 reactions across 11 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5327809576664313330 | 62 | 22.2% | |
| custom 5460634369460803689 | 49 | 17.6% | |
| 👻 | 45 | 16.1% | |
| 🤮 | 38 | 13.6% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 7.17% | |
| 👾 | 20 | 7.17% | |
| custom 5458604099765292897 | 18 | 6.45% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 2.15% | |
| 💊 | 5 | 1.79% | |
| custom 5282822968219568378 | 4 | 1.43% | |
| custom 5460953292257382579 | 3 | 1.08% | |
| custom 5445322875475095482 | 2 | 0.717% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.717% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.717% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.717% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.358% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Я их рот ебала, честное слово сука #тейк // @KzscraBot
custom 545860409976529289717custom 53278095766643133304🤮2custom 54453228754750954822custom 54609532922573825792🍓1👻1👾1
Вот надо было тебе блчть #тейк // @KzscraBot 💠 :: самое главное, что было написано про пейр с травлером, причём тут каллсраки и сандбины?
custom 532780957666431333015👾3custom 54606343694608036892👻1
Неанон; Утюг крутой. 💠 :: блин, а я такой тупой, даже не знал, что они виделись. Как же так... #тейк // @KzscraBot
custom 546063436946080368915👾4custom 53278095766643133303👻1
Неанон нетв Убить их всех нахуй #тейк // @KzscraBot
custom 546063436946080368918custom 53278095766643133306👾3👻2🤡1🤮1custom 52828229682195683781
#тейк // @KzscraBot
🤮16👾2👻1💊1custom 53278095766643133301custom 54606343694608036891
Как же оно защищает это дерьмо #тейк // @KzscraBot
👻21💊3👾2custom 53278095766643133302🦄1
проткните мне глаза вилкой #тейк // @KzscraBot
👻12custom 54606343694608036897custom 53278095766643133304👾1💊1🤮1custom 54586040997652928971
не развиваются #тейк // @KzscraBot
custom 532780957666431333015👻3🤮2custom 54606343694608036892👾1🤡1🦄1custom 52828229682195683781
👻👻👻👻🌟🤩🤩🌟 👻👻👻 [НАС ЗАРЕЙДИЛИ!! ] 💔 – Как меня бесит то что люди фанатеют по самой ужасной новелле!! 😭 🌟– почему люди поддерживают сексуализацию персонажей основных на реальных детей..?😱 🧄 - мой любимый художник оказался фанатом этой игры..🍞 ЗНАКОМО!?🍺 Тогда.... 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟😁 👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻 🌟❗️❗️🔠🔠🔠🔠❗️❗️😁 👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻 🤩🅰️nteralterbach cf 🤩 👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻 эк кф: ❌🍼🍀⭐⭐ Unteralterbach (полное название — Bernd and the…
💘6👻1
блин вауу это так необычно и совсем не клишировано даа такого же точно никто никогда не делал и конечно же сразу не становится понятен буквально ВЕСЬ сюжет даа это точно не заезженный типикал гетеронормативный яой блин ну это просто уникально #тейк // @KzscraBot 🌟 :: я в пятом классе и то лучше фанфики писала. это раз. во-вторых, еблан, научись числительные склонять. "пятиста" ☠☠
❤20🤮7👾2👻1custom 52828229682195683781custom 54606343694608036891custom 54609532922573825791
TW: мпрег. у этой всё стабильно при чём ей кстати около 25 по моему, почти как и поляо ну делаем выводы о фанатах кадзусрак хуле #тейк // @KzscraBot
custom 532780957666431333012🤮9👀2custom 54606343694608036892👻1👾1custom 52828229682195683781
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @HATEkdzscr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@HATEkdzscr named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 28 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“— Kazuscara hate confession” (@HATEkdzscr), 289 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HATEkdzscr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.