Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -282. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,030–6,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 05:39
6,072
-28
14 Sept 2026, 06:59
6,100
-25
10 Sept 2026, 07:56
6,125
-15
5 Sept 2026, 04:41
6,140
-15
1 Sept 2026, 11:54
6,155
-23
29 Aug 2026, 08:04
6,178
-13
26 Aug 2026, 02:38
6,191
-12
23 Aug 2026, 03:25
6,203
-20
20 Aug 2026, 01:36
6,223
-21
16 Aug 2026, 22:16
6,244
-25
14 Aug 2026, 01:43
6,269
-35
11 Aug 2026, 01:56
6,304
-46
7 Aug 2026, 23:03
6,350
-4
7 Aug 2026, 09:46
6,354
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 31 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
280 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
142
50.7%
👍
56
20.0%
❤🔥
51
18.2%
🔥
12
4.29%
🤩
5
1.79%
👏
3
1.07%
💯
3
1.07%
⚡
2
0.714%
🆒
2
0.714%
🍓
1
0.357%
💘
1
0.357%
😍
1
0.357%
😱
1
0.357%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2025 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❓چنل تازه تأسیس دارید با موضوع جنایی؟
پس از انجام اون چیزا که خواستم به اتحادیه چنل های جنایی تازه کار اضافتون میکنم به رهبری ما اداره میشه و هدف دیده شدن چنلای شما و تشکیل یک کامیونیتی کوچیک و دوستانه هست
شرایط خاصی نداریم فقط بیایید پیویم معرفی کنید خودتون رو و ایدی چنلتون رو بدید بهم بعد صبر میکنیم ۱۰ تا چنل بشه لیست که ادمین تبادلتون میشم و اینطوری شما یک جذبی میگیرید از چنل و گپ جنایی ما و ما هم یک اتحادیه تشک…
👁️ اگر به جن، ارواح و مطالب ماورایی علاقه دارید، اینجا جای شماست...
👻 اگه جرأتش رو دارید، عضو بشید لطفاً افراد عاشق ماورا وارد بشن 🖤👇🕯️
https://t.me/+G1pGdgDsycpjM2M8
⚫️جیمز سیرل داولی مسیرش را روی صحنه تئاتر آغاز کرد. سال ها به عنوان بازیگر و نمایشنامهنویس فعالیت داشت و همین تجربه باعث شد بعدها هنگام فیلم سازی بیش از هر چیز روی روایت و بازی بازیگران تمرکز کند. در دورانی که سینما هنوز هنری خام و ناشناخته بود...او به استودیوی ادیسون پیوست. جایی که یکی از مهم ترین مراکز تولید فیلم در آمریکا به شمار میرفت.
داولی در سال هایی فعالیت میکرد که هنوز هیچ قانون مشخصی برای فیلمسازی …
⚫️ فرانکنشتاین (۱۹۱۰) نخستین اقتباس سینمایی شناختهشده از رمان (فرانکنشتاین پرومتئوس مدرن) اثر مری شلی و یکی از اولین آثار تاریخ سینما در ژانر وحشت است. این فیلم تنها ۸۲ سال پس از انتشار رمان ساخته شد زمانی که سینما هنوز هنری نوپا بود و مفهوم "فیلم ترسناک" تازه در حال شکل گیری بود. جیمز سیرل داولی این اثر را برای استودیوی ادیسون کارگردانی کرد.
⚪️ برخلاف بسیاری از اقتباسای بعدی داولی بر خشونت تکیه نمیکند و بیشتر به …
🔮 جیمز سیرل داولی: از پیشگامان سینمای صامت
وقتی از آغاز سینمای وحشت صحبت میکنیم معمولاً نام هایی مثل جیمز ویل یا تاد براونینگ به ذهن میاد... اما سالها پیش از آنها جیمز سیرل داولی (James Searle Dawley) یکی از نخستین فیلمسازانی بود که مرزهای این هنر نوپا را گسترش داد.
داولی که فعالیتش را از تئاتر آغاز کرده بود، در سالهای ابتدایی قرن بیستم به استودیوی ادیسون پیوست و به یکی از پرکارترین فیلمسازان دوران صامت ت…
🕷Vamp / Gothic:
سبک گوتیک به عنوان یک جریان هنری و فرهنگی در قرن دوازدهم میلادی در اروپا آغاز شد و به تدریج به اوج خود در قرنهای سیزدهم تا پانزدهم رسید.
🕸 این سبک ابتدا در معماری کلیساها و کاتدرالها ظهور کرد و به خاطر ویژگیهای خاصی مانند طاقهای بلند، پنجرههای بزرگ با شیشههای رنگی و تزئینات پیچیده شناخته میشود. با گذشت زمان، این سبک به دیگر حوزههای هنری مانند نقاشی، مجسمهسازی و ادبیات نیز نفوذ کرد.
🕸همانطو…
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @H_orror_fan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@H_orror_fan edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
سیگنال فارکس @goldenpip · 80,580 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سینمای وحشت (chuckyfan)” (@H_orror_fan), 6,072 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/H_orror_fan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
