Channel
@Hadyth1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,011subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001324960222 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Hadyth1 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Hadyth1 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:27 | 1,011 | +2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 1,009 | +3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 18:16 | 1,006 | +2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 10:57 | 1,004 | +12 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 01:39 | 992 | +17 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 975 | +5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 970 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:47 | 970 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 28 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
102 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 73 | 71.6% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 13.7% | |
| 💔 | 10 | 9.80% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.96% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.98% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.98% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.98% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2025 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته مرحباً..حياكم الله جميعاً.🌸✨ بالنسبة لمجلدات الشيخ تُوجد نسخ إلكترونية، متوفرة في هذه القناة مع الصوتيات(https://t.me/qyo_2) - الأخت الكريمة التي سألت عن الإختبار بإذن الله يسير توكلي على الله، واستخيري وادعي أن يوافق والدك على إختبار القرآن، أيضاً ممكن تبلغين الإدارة بظرفك وهم لن يقصروا في إرشادك لما يناسبك بإذن الله.💗
🤩2
هاكم البُشرى📚♥️ - رابط التسجيل الرسمي للحلقات الفصلية: https://forms.gle/77GQQzMYoUHnZVqGA
❤3
من أحب شيئًا تلذذ بالجهد الذي يبذله في سبيله.🌸🤎
❤24👌1
📖🌅☕️🧡 "في هذا الحديث يخبر النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أن من أراد به الله خيرا عظيما، ونفعا كثيرا، يفقهه في الدين، فيمنحه العلم الشرعي الذي لا يدانيه خير في هذا الوجود في فضله وشرفه، وعلو درجته؛ لأنه ميراث الأنبياء الذي لم يورثوا غيره…" - الدرر السنية
❤11
صدر كتاب جديد من دار تقريب العلوم وهو: المعين على فهم معاني الجمع بين الصحيحين للشيخ يحيى اليحيى الشرح بإشراف الشيخ: أحمد الصقعوب تجدونه في أكثر من مكتبة، منها: دار المحدث https://share.google/Fu8YChK3YMujkZo0R
❤4
اذا كان ماتفعله بدافع الهوى، فلا تبرره بنصوص الشرع، فإن فعلت ذلك ضللت وأضللت.🔖📚
💯8
❤️🩹
💔5
"موت العالم ثلمة في الإسلام، لا يسدّها شيء ما اختلف الليل والنهار!". رحم الله الشيخ: عبدالعزيز آل الشيخ وأبدله داراً خيراً من داره . وأخلف على المسلمين خيراً.
💔5
Posted without readable text
😢1
حفظ الأحاديث النبوية يعين على العمل، فترك الحفظ من أجل عدم العمل به ليس صحيحاً، بل هو من مداخل الشيطان في طريق طالب العلم فمرة يقول لك : لانفع لحفظ الحديث دون فهم، أو لا فائدة للحفظ دون عمل، أو يقول غيرك اتقنها وبلغها ولست قادرا على الوصول لما وصل اليه… وهكذا، حتى يحمله الشيطان على ترك الطريق ومن ثم تفريطه ويكثر عليه التساؤلات في مجاهدته للحفظ و مراجعته وطلبه للعلم عموماً..❤️🩹 الحفظ هو عمل.. والمهم هو اصلاح القصد، …
❤11💯2🤝1
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته مرحباً أخيتي وبكل رفيقات الحديث.💕🤍 سؤالك رائع وعميق!، وهو تساؤل لا يغيب عن قلوب الكثير .. نسمر عليه الليلة ان شاء الله، ومن لديها جواب لسؤالها أو رأي حول هذا الموضوع تشاركنا على الرابط نرسله هنا بإذن الله. 🌸🍃
❤6
"أهل الحديث عصابة الحق فازوا بدعوة سيد الخلق فوجوههم زهر منضرة لألاؤها كتألق البرق".
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Hadyth1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ابنة الحديث 📚” (@Hadyth1), 1,011 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hadyth1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.