Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
14,000 average views per post against 31,338 subscribers — an engagement rate of 44.7%. Across the 3,647 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,004–31,617 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.12% and 10.1%, with a median of 5.08%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (25 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Posts measured
9 of 9 published in the window (0 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
126,160
Mature posts only
44.7% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 37 days, net -390. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,280–31,787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 18:58
31,338
-38
15 Sept 2026, 19:20
31,376
-17
14 Sept 2026, 02:37
31,393
-27
12 Sept 2026, 09:16
31,420
-19
10 Sept 2026, 07:41
31,439
-56
7 Sept 2026, 02:58
31,495
-50
4 Sept 2026, 08:02
31,545
-32
2 Sept 2026, 21:12
31,577
-10
1 Sept 2026, 21:47
31,587
-2
31 Aug 2026, 22:04
31,589
-12
31 Aug 2026, 01:22
31,601
-4
30 Aug 2026, 01:56
31,605
-6
28 Aug 2026, 23:14
31,611
-11
28 Aug 2026, 01:04
31,622
-19
27 Aug 2026, 00:54
31,641
-9
26 Aug 2026, 02:24
31,650
-19
25 Aug 2026, 05:34
31,669
-15
24 Aug 2026, 05:48
31,684
+5
22 Aug 2026, 10:26
31,679
-11
21 Aug 2026, 03:22
31,690
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.7%
avg views ÷ 31,338 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,000
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
37 (3 August 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
126,160
Reactions total
593
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,570
Videos
≈329
Links
≈1,870
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,989 reactions across 36 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,835
71.1%
🙏
517
13.0%
👍
310
7.77%
👏
110
2.76%
🔥
75
1.88%
🕊
57
1.43%
❤🔥
33
0.827%
🥰
31
0.777%
🎉
8
0.201%
⚡
4
0.1%
🤗
3
0.075%
🤩
3
0.075%
🙊
2
0.05%
😘
1
0.025%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,989 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
إعلان هام جدا من المديرية العامة لتربية البصرة / قسم التعليم العام والملاك
على الذوات المدرجة اسماؤهم في الروابط ادناه ، الوجبة الأولى من (المتعاقدين الذين لم يستلموا رواتبهم لشهر تموز و شهر آب 2026 ضمن ملف ال 38 الف درجة وظيفية) لسكنة المركز فقط مراجعة القسم المذكور ازاء اسم كل منهم (قسم النشاط الرياضي والكشفي/ و شعبة الهويات سابقاً / قرب تقاطع الجمهورية وذلك يوم الثلاثاء الموافق 9/22
لتسليم ما يأتي:
- تأييد استم…
النائب الإداري لمحافظ البصرة يصدر أمراً إدارياً تقرر بموجبه تغيير تنسيب الذوات المدرجة أسماؤهم في الجداول المرفقة وإلى الدوائر المؤشرة إزاء كل إسم..
سيتم نشر كافة الاخبار من خلال رابط القناة
https://t.me/Haider_alasedy
اخـوكــم
ممثل الخريجين وعقود الامن الغذائي
حـيـدر الاســـدي
تقديراتي للكلف وبحسبة اقتصادية واقعية وبسيطة بعيداً عن التقديرات المعقدة:
يبلغ إجمالي أصحاب العقود والأجراء بمختلف مسمياتهم حوالي 450,000 متعاقد.
وفق قانون الرواتب والمخصصات والخصومات، يبلغ متوسط صافي راتب الموظف بعد التثبيت حوالي 500,000 دينار .
الكلفة الإجمالية السنوية: التخصيص المطلوب كاملاً لجميع أفراد هذه الشريحة لسنة كاملة يعادل (2 ترليون و700 مليار دينار).
الواقع الفعلي الحالي: الدولة تدفع لهم حالياً بالفعل …
تنويه ..
يجري الآن رفع رواتب منتسبي المديرية (الملاك الدائم والعقود 28 ألف ) أما عقود ال 10 آلاف المتبقية فمازالت قيد التدقيق في وزارة المالية .. لطفا .
قسم الشؤون المالية
يعلن ديوان محافظة البصرة عن أسماء المتعاقدين ضمن ملف 13 الف درجة وظيفية مراجعة فروع شركة كي كارد في البصرة وحسب الجداول المرفقة .
ولغرض استلام البطاقة جلب (البطاقة الموحدة الأصلية / بطاقة السكن وتأييد استمرارية الموظفي) ولاتسلم البطاقة الا للشخص نفسه
مقر شركة كي كارد الكائن في العباسية خلف جامع سيد حامد
مركز إصدار مصرف الرافدين فرع الصيادلة
العشار - قرب أسد بابل
مركز إصدار مصرف الرافدين فرع البصرة 2
العشار - شارع …
الامر الاداري بالمباشرة مع القوائم الخاص بالعقود ١٣ الف ملحق ٣ المنسبين على مديرية تربية البصرة المدرس ومرشد تربوي / شعبة الملاك الثانوي / الموظفين/مركز والاقضية
* سحب نسخة من الأمر الإداري مع قائمة الأسماء الخاص بالشخص المعني بالامر وتسليمها الى ادارة المدرسة .
سيتم نشر كافة الاخبار من خلال رابط القناة
https://t.me/Haider_alasedy
اخـوكــم
ممثل الخريجين وعقود الامن الغذائي
حـي…
☯️اعلان
☯️الى جميع الاخوة متابعة قناة حـيـدر الاســدي ع واتساب
وان جميع تفاصيل وملفات يتم نشرة اول ب اول عبر القناة ورابط ادناه
اضغط متابعه للقناة 👇🏻👇🏻
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7U6bb4NViddrEdh62j
❤88🙏20👍11🥰3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @Haider_alasedy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
قناة مجلة_P. N. N @Majla_news_channel · 33,635 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
عدي عواد - Odai Awad @odayawadaltmimi · 59,773 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
قناة اخبار الرواتب @MM95_95MM · 22,951 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
البصرة الحبيبة @AlbasraAlhabeba · 58,793 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
️ الـــقناة الــــرسمية @alraayHD2022 · 172,648 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
قناة ملاك تربية البصرة @BasraEducation · 22,678 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 September 2026
محمد حسين أبو العيس @mhdhjdgjvcxxcnnvcsagnnbxccjfsssg · 95,016 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 August 2026
قناة علي المحمداوي @aqodalbasraa · 76,567 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
قناة حسن كطامي @fdabhdghbvxsbnmbvdsshyfssjb · 21,266 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
الموقع الرسمي لديوان محافظة البصرة @basrawebsite · 44,085 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
شبكة أهل البصرة @basrah_net · 95,089 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
بوابة الوظائف والتعيينات الحكومية فقط @bsredu · 21,664 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
اهل الزبير ahl-alzubair @ahlalzubair90 · 76,188 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
وظائف البصرة @basrajobs · 83,077 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
المديرية العامة لتربية البصرة @Bsraedumedia · 99,221 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة حـيـدر الاســدي” (@Haider_alasedy), 31,338 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Haider_alasedy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.