Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 5БЗ на практике

Channel

5БЗ на практике

@Hamer5BN

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

933subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002544246153
TypeChannel
Username@Hamer5BN
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hamer5BN

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9039339187 August 2026 — 903 subscribers7 August 2026 — 904 subscribers16 August 2026 — 910 subscribers24 August 2026 — 911 subscribers30 August 2026 — 919 subscribers8 September 2026 — 923 subscribers17 September 2026 — 933 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 899–938 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 11:20933+10
8 Sept 2026, 20:17923+4
30 Aug 2026, 18:24919+8
24 Aug 2026, 18:57911+1
16 Aug 2026, 05:25910+6
7 Aug 2026, 23:22904+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:48903first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

518 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18335.3%
👍18235.1%
🔥13025.1%
🙏101.93%
😍50.965%
🥰50.965%
👏20.386%
🤔10.193%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 518 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:22 UTC39 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Спасибо за обратную связь и голосование! Большинство — за вечер в будни. Эфир — 10 августа, в понедельник, в 18:00 МСК. Платформу пока не определил. Скорее всего, ВКонтакте с сохранением записи. Для вопросов к эфиру создам отдельный чат. Ссылку опубликую за день до встречи.

🔥7👍4😍2

3 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC295 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

В какое время вам удобно?

  1. Утром 10:00-12:0021%
  2. Днём 14:00-16:0027%
  3. Вечером 18:00-20:0045%
  4. В будни43%
  5. На выходных27%

The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC283 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Проведём прямой эфир? 🎙 Каналу уже чуть больше года. За это время удалось систематизировать некоторые опорные точки для практического применения 5БЗ. И планов на продолжение у меня ещё много. Но чувствую, что надо немного выйти из одностороннего формата и синхронизироваться с вами, уважаемые подписчики. — насколько полезна для вас публикуемая информация? — каких тем и форматов вам не хватает? — что вызывает вопро

👍25🔥11😍3

23 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC544 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как применять модель на практике? Для понимания тканевых изменений важно анализировать не отдельный симптом, а всю историю процесса во времени. 🕗 1️⃣ Определить затронутую ткань и её функцию. 2️⃣ Проследить динамику боли и функциональных изменений 📉: — когда они возникали; — когда уменьшались или исчезали; — насколько восстанавливалась функция между эпизодами. 3️⃣ Учесть вторичные механизмы: — миофасциальную с

👍1610🙏3

23 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC425 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Полицикличное протекание При этой форме каждый отдельный цикл ЦБС успевает пройти все фазы: активная фаза → PCL-A → PCL-B → нормотония. В отличие от зависшего восстановления, новый рецидив возникает уже после того, как ткань сформировала новый матрикс, прошла ремоделирование и восстановила функцию. 🦴 Что происходит с тканью? — в активной фазе происходит очередная атрофия; — в PCL-A возникают воспаление, отёк, б

6👍3

23 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC309 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Зависшее восстановление Биологическое разрешение конфликта происходит, и ткань входит в фазу PCL-A. Но восстановление не успевает завершиться и прерывается новым рецидивом. В итоге ткань постоянно переключается между атрофией и воспалительной перестройкой, не доходя до завершённого ремоделирования в PCL-B. 🦴 Что происходит с тканью? — в PCL-A возникают отёк, боль и механическая нестабильность; — при рецидиве восп

7👍3🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC296 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Длительная активная фаза без биологического разрешения ✅ В затронутой ткани новой мезодермы продолжается постепенная атрофия. ❌ Восстановительные фазы PCL-A и PCL-B не наступают. Как правило, при такой форме протекания человек в определённой мере приспосабливается к ситуации, находит психологический компромисс или старается не обращать на неё внимания. Однако психологическая адаптация ещё не означает биологическо

9👍2🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC329 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Три типичные формы протекания ЦБС В теории ЦБС выглядит как один последовательный цикл. Но, как мы уже поняли, на практике она часто протекает не моноциклично: ⚡️ биологический конфликт долго не разрешается — длительная активная фаза без биологического решения; ⚡️ восстановление прерывается рецидивами — зависшее восстановление; ⚡️ завершённые циклы повторяются — полицикличное протекание. Это происходит, когда нет

9🔥5👍2

23 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC301 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вторичные механизмы, изменяющие картину Реальное проявление ЦБС зависит не только от фазовых изменений самой ткани. Дополнительные механизмы могут усиливать: — боль; — отёк; — ограничение движения; — деформацию. Они не определяют основное фазовое изменение ткани новой мезодермы, а накладываются на уже происходящий процесс и изменяют его проявления. 🅰️ Миофасциальная стабилизация Когда ткань становится болезнен

14👍4

23 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC356 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Три фазовых состояния тканей новой мезодермы В рамках полного цикла ЦБС затронутая ткань проходит три последовательных направления изменений. 1️⃣ Активная фаза Замедляется естественное обновление ткани — развивается атрофия. Ткань постепенно истончается, а её функция снижается. Этот процесс протекает без воспаления и боли, поэтому долго может оставаться незаметным. При продолжительной активной фазе ткань станови

9👍7

23 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC373 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

О чём видео №03.3? 🎥 Понять, почему одна ЦБС может приводить к разным изменениям ткани. Биологические конфликты потери самооценки связаны с тканями новой мезодермы: — костями; — мышцами; — сухожилиями и связками; — хрящевыми и суставными структурами; — соединительной и другими тканями. Все они выполняют общую биологическую функцию: поддерживают физическую дееспособность организма. Даже после изучения теории 5БЗ,

👍115👏2

14 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC708 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📺 Видео №03.3 Продолжаем тему биологических конфликтов — Потери Самооценки. В феврале 2026 года я опубликовал видеопрезентацию и серию постов, посвящённых этой теме. Новый выпуск стал их продолжением: в нём я подробно рассматриваю изменения, происходящие на уровне органа. ▫️ Как возникают структурные деформации и уплотнения? ▫️ Как образуются избыточные тканевые разрастания? ▫️ Почему медицина одни из них называе

👍1611🔥10🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Hamer5BN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTCAnonymous Poll84 voters

В какое время вам удобно?

  1. Утром 10:00-12:0021%
  2. Днём 14:00-16:0027%
  3. Вечером 18:00-20:0045%
  4. В будни43%
  5. На выходных27%

The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“5БЗ на практике” (@Hamer5BN), 933 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hamer5BN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.