Channel
@Hamid_Farzinn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,662subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001055201254 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Hamid_Farzinn |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Hamid_Farzinn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 1,662 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 1,666 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 1,666 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 May 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,352 |
| Reactions total | 130 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
442 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 441 | 99.8% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.226% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 442 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
فداکاری و توقعهای ناگفته در خانواده ایرانی، فداکاری فقط فداکاری نیست. خیلی وقتها آدمها چیزی را برای هم انجام میدهند، اما درباره چیزی که پشت آن است حرف نمیزنند. من برای تو ماندم. به خاطر تو از خیلی چیزها گذشتم. سکوت کردم. خودم را کنار گذاشتم. و بعد یک جایی، اینها تبدیل میشوند به یک حساب نانوشته. طرف مقابل شاید اصلاً نداند چنین حسابی وجود دارد. او فکر میکند تو انتخاب کردهای بمانی، سکوت کنی یا از چیزی بگ…
👍12
Signed بامداد
کودکی که بارها با خشم، ناراحتی یا نارضایتی بزرگترها روبهرو میشود، همیشه نمیتواند بفهمد حال آنها به خودشان مربوط است. برایش سادهتر است فکر کند «من باعثش شدم». چون اگر مشکل از او باشد، شاید بتواند با بهتر شدن، ساکت شدن یا عذرخواهی کردن اوضاع را درست کند.... برای بچه ساده تر است که بگوید" من بدم"....
👍22
Signed بامداد
Photo, posted without a caption
👍17
Signed بامداد
https://www.instagram.com/p/Dc0I6apDfqu/?igsi=MTJiOXlvb2Zqd2Zqcw==
Signed بامداد
وقتی تورم وارد ذهن میشود یکی از چیزهابی که در شرایط اقتصادی بیثبات بیشتر از خودِ کمبود آزاردهنده است، ناتوانی در پیشبینی آینده است. وقتی آدم نمیداند سه ماه دیگر چه مقدار از زندگیاش در دسترس او خواهد بود، آینده دیگر فقط محل برنامهریزی نیست؛ تبدیل میشود به موضوع نگرانی. در چنین وضعیتی، ذهن مدام مشغول پیشبینی و محاسبه است. مسئله فقط این نیست که چه چیزی را میتوانیم بخریم یا نمیتوانیم بخریم. مساله این است که در …
👍25
Signed بامداد
ای کاش،آدمی تنها میتوانست یکبار خود را محاکمه و مجازات کند...نه بارها و نه بارها، برای یک خطا...
👍38
Signed بامداد
از گناه در برابر خدا تا گناه در برابر خود هزار سال تحول "تجربه گناه" در ادبیات فارسی از قرن دهم تا بیست و یکم میلادی انسان ایرانی در دورههای مختلف، گناه را چطور تجربه کرده است؟ این تجربه مشخصا در طول زمان تغییر کرده... در متون قدیمیتر، مثل آثار غزالی، گناه بیشتر در رابطه با خدا معنا پیدا میکند. انسان خطا میکند، میترسد، پشیمان میشود و به توبه فکر میکند. هنوز یک نظم نسبتاً روشن وجود دارد و مهمتر از آن، راه ب…
👍16
Signed بامداد
با چه ترسی بی تو دور از چشم تو می زیستم من حریف جذبه ی چشم تو هرگز نیستم رحم کن تا شب بی جنبش بی حوصلگی پشت این پنجره ی خالی قابم نکنه دارم از فکر رسیدن به تو آباد می شم تو بیا که باد ولگرد خرابم نکنه .. . ای مراقب چراغ نفس من در باد نفست به شعر من جرأت عریانی داد بال پرواز من در به در عاشق باش چون که در من کسی از اوج پریدن افتاد ... رحم کن دست تو پرپر شدنو می فهمه رحم کن چشم تو ایثار منو می فهمه .. .
👍7
Signed بامداد
اتاقی چراغی میخواست چراغ، میزی میخواست میز، دفتری میخواست دفتر، قلمی میخواست قلم، دستی میخواست و دست نیز آزادی میخواست!
👍26
Signed بامداد
انسان میمیرد، اما اثر او در اشیا، بوها، صداها و خاطرات باقی میماند...
👍33
Signed بامداد
دل نیست کبوتر که چو برخاست، نشیند از گوشەی بامی که پریدیم، پریدیم! وحشی بافقی
👍29
Signed بامداد
تو با خورشید زندگی میکنی/ آنا آخماتووا دیگر از یک لیوان نخواهیم خورد نه آبی، نه شرابی دیگر بوسههای صبحگاهی نخواهند بود و تماشای غروب از پنجره نیز تو با خورشید زندگی میکنی من با ماه در ما ولی فقط یک عشق زنده است برای من، دوستی وفادار و ظریف برای تو دختری سرزنده و شاد اما من وحشت را در چشمان خاکستری تو میبینم دیدارها کوتاه و دیر به دیر در شعر من فقط صدای توست که می خواند در شعر تو روح من است که سرگردان است آتشی بر…
👍21
Signed بامداد
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Hamid_Farzinn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hamid Farzin(Azizi)” (@Hamid_Farzinn), 1,662 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hamid_Farzinn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.