.ㅤ ⊹ ㅤ︎ ↯ Б᧘ᥙн! 𐌑нᥱ κᥲжᥱᴛᥴя, чᴛ᧐ ϶ᴛ᧐ ᥴᥲᥰᥰ ᥙ ϶ᴛ᧐ᴛ ʙыᴦ᧘ядяᴛ κᥲκ κᥲн᧐н! ─────────────── - ꪆ୧ ๋ А ⲙнᥱ κᥲжᥱᴛᥴя, чᴛ᧐ ϶ᴛ᧐ᴛ дʙ ᥙ ϶ᴛ᧐ᴛ δ᧘᧐ᴦ нᥲᥴᴛ᧐ящᥙᥔ κᥲн᧐н!! ៹❕ ฺ Знᥲκ᧐ⲙ᧐? Т᧐ᴦдᥲ д᧐δρ᧐ ᥰ᧐жᥲ᧘᧐ʙᥲᴛь. ᨦ 📷 Здᥱᥴь ʙы ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛᥱ ᥰ᧐дᥱ᧘ᥙᴛьᥴя ᥴʙ᧐ᥱᥔ ᧘юδᥙⲙ᧐ᥔ ᥰᥲρ᧐чκ᧐ᥔ ʙ дᥲнн᧐ᥔ ᥴɸᥱρᥱ( ˃ ㅅ ˂ ) ─────────────── | #𝔯𝔱𝔭𝔬𝔰𝔱 |

Channel
𝐻𝑒𝒶𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓇 𝐻𝒾𝓁𝓁𝓈ˎˊ˗. ꒷
@HeatherHills_inGlamore
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004390039787 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HeatherHills_inGlamore |
| Description | ˖ ݁♬⋆.˚𝄞݁ ˖Ი𐑼⋆ я ⲿυⲃⲩ ⲃ ⲣⲉⲿυⲙⲉ „ⲧⲟⲗьⲕⲟ ⳝⲗⲉⲥⲕ υ ⲭⲁύⲡ“ — ⲇⲗя ⲙⲉⲏя ⲉⲧⲟ ⲉⲇυⲏⲥⲧⲃⲉⲏⲏыύ ⲥⲡⲟⲥⲟⳝ ⳝыⲧь ⲥɥⲁⲥⲧⲗυⲃⲟύ ⊹ ࣪ ˖ᯓ💫 •я ни капли не претендую на 100% канон.🌊 •все, что происходит в канале является хэдканонами//юмористической выдумкой.🎼🪁 𝒦𝐼𝒮𝒮𝐸𝒮, 𝒴𝒪𝒰𝑅 𝐵𝐼𝒯𝒞𝐻.🫧💘 |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HeatherHills_inGlamore |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:22 | 7 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:48 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 1 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 249.6%
- avg views ÷ 7 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 17.5
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 16.3%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (1 November 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 297 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 8
- Links
- 7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
41 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5456501090503653217 | 12 | 29.3% | |
| custom 5454077208530288469 | 9 | 22.0% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 17.1% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 9.76% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 7.32% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 7.32% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.44% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HeatherHills_inGlamore. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 November 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ОЧЕНЬ ИЩЕМ ВПШЕРОВ 🐻🐻—Хочу пахать на впшере за ЗП ,но блять где найти работу? 🪆🪆—Хочу набрать себе дохуя каналов для вп бесплатно,но где их найти 💥💥— Где найти канал у которого будет нормальная зарплата 🐸🐸>Знакомая ситуация не правда ли? Мы вам поможем!💦 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩Search for admin Cf🤩 ╰┈➤Навигация ╰┈➤Вп пост ╰┈➤Бот @SearchforadminCfBot
🌟🌟🌟
custom 54540772085302884692
🤩🤩🤩🔤πѳκѳӣʜѳӣ н0чи🌛🌛 🔤сем, кроме тех, кто 🔤🔤 ηⲟ∂ηυςɑⲏ на 🪟ᗝᗪᖘᑌᏦА 🙄🙄🙄 (💖)🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟(💖)
custom 54565010905036532172🍓1👀1
🐰🐰🐰. •@🐰🐰🌟🌟 🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰 Я, конечно, понимаю, что в нашем доме проживает одна помойная крыса с доступом к косметике, но чтобы настолько ахуеть — это надо постараться. ••••🐰🐰•••• 🐰🐰 🐰🐰😡⤵︎ Эта малолетняя стерва Холли 😡 взяла МОЮ помаду. Без спроса. МОЮ. Помаду.💄И, судя по всему, ещё и умудрилась накрасить свои крошечные губы 👄 этой дорогущей прелестью. Я теперь даже смотреть 👀 на неё не …
🔥2🍓1👀1custom 54540772085302884691custom 54565010905036532171
🤩одрик, ты же кастрирован, как та обезьяна из зоопарка.😉😉 🐰🐰🐰🐰 #тейк
👀2
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! БОГИНЯ,у меня каменный на твои посты!!! Твой РХ. ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.
🤩а моих великолепных постах по 17 чертовых просмотров. 🤩 до сих пор не понимаю : где ваше восхищение, сучки?🐰🐰😺
custom 54565010905036532172
Все зависит от того, кто ты, котенок.😘 Если это опять этот вонючий говнорокер, то мой ответ тебе уже известен. Родрик, ты не смог купить себе еду в столовой, какое тебе свидание, да еще и с такой, как я? Иди отвлекись со своей рукой, забудь про меня, нищеброд.😶🌫️ #тейк
custom 54540772085302884692🔥1custom 54565010905036532171
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! привет, пойдём на свидание?? пожалуйста! всё за мой счёт. ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.
Моё утро начиналось практически идеально: любимая машина, безупречная укладка, блеск для губ, который стоит больше, чем вся одежда большинства учеников этой школы, и полное отсутствие желания видеть чьи-либо лица. Особенно лица людей, которые по какой-то причине считают, что имеют право находиться в радиусе моего личного пространства.⚡️ 🌟 Я медленно въехала на школьную парковку, присматривая себе подходящее место. Ра…
custom 54565010905036532172🍓1custom 54540772085302884691
Научись писать, покойонник хренов😽 #тейк
custom 54565010905036532172
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @HeatherHills_inGlamore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐻𝑒𝒶𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓇 𝐻𝒾𝓁𝓁𝓈ˎˊ˗. ꒷” (@HeatherHills_inGlamore), 7 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HeatherHills_inGlamore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.