Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @ 𝖧𝖡 | High Bound

Channel

@ 𝖧𝖡 | High Bound

@HighBound_fashion

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003859973163
TypeChannel
Username@HighBound_fashion
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 23 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged5 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/HighBound_fashion

Growth

17191812 August 2026 — 19 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17 subscribers12 August 202619 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 20:0517-2
12 Aug 2026, 12:5319no change
12 Aug 2026, 05:3119first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 6 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5202161944802386236610.5%
custom 520188622078688564058.77%
custom 528968813843477712358.77%
custom 528991258054075554858.77%
custom 537318898993310264558.77%
custom 520178814091371480947.02%
custom 527194363567016691335.26%
custom 528952330617989762035.26%
custom 528981664815124106435.26%
custom 535931204079402628635.26%
custom 535934969906727534535.26%
custom 537316751080165224635.26%
custom 538438435906102760735.26%
custom 541127121081627237235.26%
custom 527833410033002217323.51%
custom 546543459670952722611.75%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC58 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52018862207868856403custom 52021619448023862363custom 53731889899331026453custom 53731675108016522462custom 52017881409137148091custom 52783341003300221731custom 53593120407940262861custom 53593496990672753451

31 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC49 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52017881409137148092custom 52018862207868856402custom 52021619448023862362custom 52783341003300221731custom 53593120407940262861custom 53593496990672753451custom 53731675108016522461custom 53731889899331026451

31 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC52 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52896881384347771232custom 52899125805407555482custom 52017881409137148091custom 52021619448023862361custom 53593120407940262861custom 53593496990672753451custom 53731889899331026451

25 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC63 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52895233061798976201custom 52896881384347771231custom 52898166481512410641custom 52899125805407555481custom 54112712108162723721

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HighBound_fashion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@ 𝖧𝖡 | High Bound” (@HighBound_fashion), 17 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HighBound_fashion.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.