Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,328–8,377 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 17:59
8,370
-1
11 Sept 2026, 17:58
8,371
+9
7 Sept 2026, 03:00
8,362
+7
2 Sept 2026, 16:53
8,355
+8
30 Aug 2026, 12:17
8,347
-8
27 Aug 2026, 19:34
8,355
+4
25 Aug 2026, 04:34
8,351
+11
22 Aug 2026, 11:17
8,340
+6
19 Aug 2026, 11:14
8,334
-5
16 Aug 2026, 04:04
8,339
+1
9 Aug 2026, 23:36
8,338
-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:32
8,339
-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:02
8,341
no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:14
8,341
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 8,370 subscribers
Avg views / post
986
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
35 (6 July 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
7,888
Reactions total
435
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 26s
Average length
2m 26s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,768 reactions across 35 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
905
51.2%
👍
428
24.2%
😁
102
5.77%
🤣
101
5.71%
👎
54
3.05%
🔥
53
3.00%
⚡
48
2.71%
🤯
28
1.58%
🥰
18
1.02%
🤔
8
0.452%
😭
6
0.339%
👏
5
0.283%
💔
4
0.226%
🤪
4
0.226%
🗿
3
0.17%
🍾
1
0.057%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,768 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ایوانا لینچ ازدواج کرد. 🥺
ایوانا لینچ که در فیلمهای هری پاتر نقش لونا لاوگود را بازی میکرد، در ۳۵ سالگی با دنیس اسکینر ازدواج کرد.
ایوانا برای انتخاب تاریخ عروسی با یه ستارهشناس مشورت کرده و خیلی هم به توصیههای ستارهشناس پایبند بوده. (لونا استایل)
خود ایوانا گفته که برنامهریزی عروسیشون اصلا مسیر سادهای نداشته؛ لباسش از قرمز به صورتی تغییر کرده و حتی یه مدت تصمیم گرفته بودن لباس رو تکهتکه کنن! 😂 تاریخ، مکان…
💯 با یک تصمیم ناگهانی، کیت هرینگتون قراره نقش گیلدوری لاکهارت توی فصل ۲ سریال رو بازی کنه و جایگزین نیکلاس هولت بشه.
نیکلاس هولت همین چند روز پیش برای این نقش انتخاب شده بود ولی به دلیل تداخل برنامه های فیلمبرداری از پروژه سریال کنار رفت.
@Hogwartz_ir
🔮داشتم کتاب هری پاتر و زندانی آزکابان رو میخوندم که یه نکته ذهنمو درگیر کرد.
⭕️❓به نظر شما،بعد از اینکه مشخص شد تموم این کارا کار پتی گرو بوده،دامبلدور نمیتونست با نفوذی که توی وزارت جادو و ویزنگاموت داشت،سیریوس بلک رو تبرئه کنه؟آیا دامبلدور عمدا سیریوس رو تبرئه نکرد؟
🪄شما نظرتون چیه؟
@Hogwartz_ir
🗓 بیستم اوت
امروز در تقویم هاگوارتز، اتفاق خاصی رخ نداده است.
☀️فکت
ادی ردماین خیلی پیش از آن که نقش اصلی جانوران شگفت انگیز را از آن خودش کند، برای ایفای نقش "تام ریدل" در سری فیلمهای هری پاتر هم تست داده بود؛ اما به گفته خودش اوضاع خوب پیش نرفته است و دیگر سراغی از او نگرفتند.
بعدها همچنان امید داشته است بهعنوان یکی از اعضای خانواده ویزلی برگزیده شود اما متاسفانه این اتفاق نیز رخ نداد.
#Fact
#20_august
@Hogwartz_…
🔮فکت:
🪄رولینگ دلش میخواست توی گروهبندی هاگوارتز،یه گریفیندوری باشه.
پ.ن:
رولینگ:البته این به این معنی نیست که من الان یه گریفندوری هستم و توی این گروه قرار دارم.رگه های پررنگی از هافلپاف رو توی شخصیتم احساس میکنم.
#Fact
@Hogwartz_ir
🔮فکت:
🪄اولین بار وقتی رولینگ با قطار در سفر بود،ایدهی نوشتن هری پاتر به ذهنش رسید.
پ.ن:رولینگ:«میدانستم هری جادوگر است و این راهم میدانستم که خودش از جادوگر بودنش بیخبر است.»
#Fact
@Hogwartz_ir
😁56⚡14❤9🤣5
Signed 𝐴𝑀𝐼𝑅
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Hogwartz_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به مناسبت تقویم جادویی امروز،دوست دارین سریال جدید هری پاتر با چه سرعتی ساخته و پخش بشه؟
مثل فیلما تقریبا هرسال یه فصل.25%
سریع تر از سینمایی ها پخش بشه.8%
پشت سر هم ساخته و پخش بشه.23%
سرعتش مهم نیست فقط کیفیت بالایی داشته باشه.44%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hogwartz.ir | هاگوارتز | هری پاتر” (@Hogwartz_ir), 8,370 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hogwartz_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
