Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Обыкновенный Трансхохлизм (АНАЛитика Военвхорства)

Channel

Обыкновенный Трансхохлизм (АНАЛитика Военвхорства)

@HoholCalling

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,231subscribers

-959 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001606710299
TypeChannel
Username@HoholCalling
DescriptionПервый дагестанский паноптикум им.Куршинюка, где есть: - трансхохлы разного весу; - паникующие немсовички; - срочносборные военкурвы; и прочие сирые и убогие Заявки в чат принимаются в ручном режиме. Если долго висите в очереди - жалуетесь в ЛС канала
Created13 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 October 2026
Measurements held43
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/HoholCalling

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

30,20731,19030,698.56 August 2026 — 31,190 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,190 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,189 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,173 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,160 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,142 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,123 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,096 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,088 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,067 subscribers15 August 2026 — 31,057 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,018 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,986 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,959 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,944 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,929 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,900 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,856 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,830 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,807 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,804 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,790 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,771 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,758 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,730 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,705 subscribers3 September 2026 — 30,684 subscribers4 September 2026 — 30,657 subscribers7 September 2026 — 30,577 subscribers10 September 2026 — 30,496 subscribers12 September 2026 — 30,468 subscribers14 September 2026 — 30,437 subscribers15 September 2026 — 30,524 subscribers18 September 2026 — 30,554 subscribers29 September 2026 — 30,417 subscribers5 October 2026 — 30,352 subscribers9 October 2026 — 30,280 subscribers13 October 2026 — 30,277 subscribers15 October 2026 — 30,241 subscribers16 October 2026 — 30,215 subscribers17 October 2026 — 30,207 subscribers18 October 2026 — 30,227 subscribers18 October 2026 — 30,231 subscribers30,2316 August 202618 October 2026
43 measurements spanning 74 days, net -959. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,060–31,337 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Oct 2026, 23:3830,231+4
18 Oct 2026, 02:2830,227+20
17 Oct 2026, 04:0730,207-8
16 Oct 2026, 01:5730,215-26
15 Oct 2026, 00:3830,241-36
13 Oct 2026, 16:1530,277-3
9 Oct 2026, 17:1630,280-72
5 Oct 2026, 09:2130,352-65
29 Sept 2026, 06:1530,417-137
18 Sept 2026, 01:2030,554+30
15 Sept 2026, 23:1830,524+87
14 Sept 2026, 06:5830,437-31
12 Sept 2026, 16:1730,468-28
10 Sept 2026, 18:3730,496-81
7 Sept 2026, 13:4130,577-80
4 Sept 2026, 18:2130,657-27
3 Sept 2026, 00:5630,684-21
1 Sept 2026, 20:4730,705-25
31 Aug 2026, 19:5830,730-28
30 Aug 2026, 17:1630,758first reading

Engagement

432 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 121 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.2%
avg views ÷ 30,231 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,420
219 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
219
of 432 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026
Posts held432 (29 July 2026 – 19 October 2026)
Views total1,405,090
Reactions total71,192
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Oct 2026, 20:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈15,000
Videos
≈765
Links
≈1,580

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 59s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

138,298 reactions across 426 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5188595775201877688110,43579.9%
😁15,91311.5%
custom 53728273751615849765,4773.96%
❤1,7211.24%
🤡9500.687%
🍾8270.598%
🫡7580.548%
❤‍🔥5650.409%
🌚5390.39%
💩3900.282%
🥰2290.166%
🍌1670.121%
😢1580.114%
🤮1060.077%
🥱580.042%
💔50.004%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 432 of the 432 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140,567 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 432 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Oct 2026, 20:14 UTC≈1,340 views70 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 518859577520187768869💩1

19 Oct 2026, 20:02 UTC≈1,730 views108 reactionsread 19 October 2026

Чел, у тебя баба Срака уехала на кичу не смотря на все твои громкие пуки "Я ОБНАРУЖИЛ ОШИБКУ КОТОРАЯ РАЗВАЛИТ ВСЕ УГОЛОВНОЕ ДЕЛО" Хотя вы со скуфской общиной друг друга стоите так что ваш жабагадюкинг меня крайне веселит

custom 5188595775201877688102💩2🤡2😁2

19 Oct 2026, 19:37 UTC≈2,130 views155 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

КАК ВЫ СМЕЕТЕ МНЕ КИДАТЬ В КОММЕНТЫ ПРУФЫ ЧТО МОНТЯН НЕ ЛИТЕРАЛИ ГАРРИ ПОТТЕР А БЕЛАТРИСА! В БАН! В БАААААААН!

custom 5188595775201877688136custom 53728273751615849768😁7❤4

19 Oct 2026, 19:32 UTC≈2,170 views151 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

МОНТЯН ЭТО ЛИТЕРАЛИ ГАРРИ ПОТТЕР А СУДЬЯ ЭТО ДОЛОРЕС АМБРИДЖ А ПРОКУРОР ЭТО МАЛФОИД С МЕТРОВЫМ СТРАПОНОМ!!! ДОКОЛЕ НАШУ БАБУ ГАРРИ БУДУТ НАСИЛОВАТЬ ВСЯКИЕ МАЛФОИДЫ В ПОГОНАХ???

custom 5188595775201877688133custom 537282737516158497615❤3

19 Oct 2026, 19:28 UTC≈2,390 views163 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Вообще отрадно наблюдать как судьба бабы Сраки заставила весь военкурятник трястись от осознания, что "да я срочносборил на СВО нашим мальчикам" это не индульгенция на неуемный пиздеж.

custom 518859577520187768886❤50😁22🤡3💩1🤮1

19 Oct 2026, 19:22 UTC≈2,300 views165 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

На фоне набутыливания бабы Сраки у Юрки Сенцова случились фантомные пригопыпные боли

custom 5188595775201877688141😁18💩4🤡1🤮1

19 Oct 2026, 15:23 UTC≈4,780 views312 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Video

ОДОДОДОДО. Топила за Россию куда деваться 🙂

custom 5188595775201877688251😁43🍾14❤4

19 Oct 2026, 15:14 UTC≈4,300 views359 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

1) Монтян как была неблагодарной свиньей так и осталась. За что и получила по своему рылу. 2) Да, с таким багажом как у бабы Сраки, нужно говорить спасибо за паспорт и не пиздеть. Минусы?

custom 5188595775201877688277❤31😁28🍾15💩5🥰2🤡1

19 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC≈5,320 views383 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Курский берсерк вызывает на бой

custom 5372827375161584976206😁116custom 518859577520187768851🍌9🤡1

19 Oct 2026, 12:54 UTC≈5,840 views378 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Военкурятник спал и видел как нижний телеграм будут подтягивать за критику военкурятных господ, перед которыми мы все пацаки без штанов и обязаны делать три раза ку. А теперь почему то #записька и ко ноют "нельзя судить за слова!!!"🙂

custom 5188595775201877688314😁49custom 537282737516158497612💩3

19 Oct 2026, 12:47 UTC≈6,570 views266 reactionsread 19 October 2026

И нет, в том что немытого вротенкепку забаранили именно сегодня - нет ни моей, ни чьей либо ещё заслуги (чтобы там вы не читали на каналах всяких медиаломов). Просто стукач перестал поставлять палки и сам стал палкой.

custom 5188595775201877688227🍾17custom 537282737516158497617🫡5

19 Oct 2026, 12:44 UTC≈6,560 views273 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Иронично 👮‍♂️

custom 5188595775201877688245🍾15custom 537282737516158497613

Showing the 12 most recent of 432 posts we hold for @HoholCalling. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Oct 2026, 07:19 UTCAnonymous Poll968 voters

Кто ебал жену Романова ?

  1. Яибал41%
  2. Явиебу48%
  3. Яибалиещеразвиебу64%

The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 432 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 19 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

⚡️INVESTBLOG⚡️
@investblog_ru · 18,900
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 October 2026
ПНВ: Вне формата 🌰
@voenacherclub · 24,198
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 September 2026
LOSTARMOUR | Carthago delenda est!
@lost_armour · 88,562
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Обыкновенный Трансхохлизм (АНАЛитика Военвхорства)” (@HoholCalling), 30,231 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HoholCalling.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.