Channel
@Holsler_cr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
84subscribers
+38 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004417124522 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Holsler_cr |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 5 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Holsler_cr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 84 | +2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 82 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 78 | +13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 65 | +9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 56 | +10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 46 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 46 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
140 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5409348843584118412 | 36 | 25.7% | |
| custom 5435980771850477189 | 36 | 25.7% | |
| custom 5193090870794015427 | 16 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5220107198633359090 | 15 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5231182948627160758 | 12 | 8.57% | |
| custom 5424927445880960845 | 11 | 7.86% | |
| custom 5190600352403056414 | 8 | 5.71% | |
| custom 5465371903071906410 | 5 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5321123167282946124 | 1 | 0.714% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔤анный канал целиком и полностью посвящён Эрагону, если так же как и мы любите этого персонажа – вы попали в самое ядро любви к нему. 🤩🤩🤩 Здесь вы найдёте: ▪️Зарисовки, фанфики, хэдканоны; ▪️Эстетичные генерации; ▪️Мемы про любимого серафима, и его окружение; ▪️Видео, эдиты; ▪️Спойлеры из обновления касаемые Эрагона, различные теории; Все работы сделаны нашими адми…
💎 Финальная «Алмазная Лихорадка» перед августовским обновлением уже совсем скоро! Ваш идеальный шанс подтянуть все хвосты и встретить новые серии во всеоружии! Игровое событие начнётся в 4:00 по мск и продлится 72 часа! Выборы за алмазы будут БЕСПЛАТНЫМИ во всех историях.
custom 54093488435841184122
напоминаю!💕
Posted without readable text
custom 540934884358411841211custom 543598077185047718910custom 52201071986333590909
я почти сделала руди и решила побаловаться😏
custom 54359807718504771899custom 52201071986333590906custom 54093488435841184126
зачем я открыла свой рот🔫.. Но я его сделаю.
если я поверю в свои силы, то сделаю ВИДЕО блять 😔🥺🤍
Sticker, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
custom 519309087079401542711custom 543598077185047718910custom 51906003524030564148
мало прекрасной женщины, но чуть позже будут обработки с ней💕
custom 54093488435841184123
Posted without readable text
custom 54093488435841184129custom 52311829486271607588custom 54359807718504771897custom 53211231672829461241
моя любовь к нему так велика, что это я 2 слот с ним прохожу уже.. Пожалуйста, ставьте мне вип на все эдиты с ним
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Holsler_cr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Holsler_cr named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Holsler” (@Holsler_cr), 84 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Holsler_cr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.