Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Couples

Channel

Couples

@Home_Of_Loves

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,036subscribers

+45 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002658500742
TypeChannel
Username@Home_Of_Loves
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Home_Of_Loves

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,9803,0363,0087 August 2026 — 2,991 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,990 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,983 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,981 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,980 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,990 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,993 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,995 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,004 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,008 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,019 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,036 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,972–3,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 10:393,036+17
11 Sept 2026, 21:013,019+11
7 Sept 2026, 03:353,008+4
2 Sept 2026, 17:073,004+9
30 Aug 2026, 11:042,995+2
24 Aug 2026, 14:252,993+3
20 Aug 2026, 13:042,990+10
17 Aug 2026, 14:252,980-1
14 Aug 2026, 18:062,981-2
10 Aug 2026, 22:012,983-7
8 Aug 2026, 00:522,990-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:162,991first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6487.7%
🥰68.22%
❤‍🔥11.37%
👍11.37%
🔥11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC74 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Couple_Pictures_Videos_GifsPhoto

I have to say you are truly magic.❤️‍🔥 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔™ 💞

7 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC143 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Couple_Pictures_Videos_Gifs

Channel for sale If interested DM @lidu_o

6 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC195 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Couple_Pictures_Videos_GifsVideo

Love ❤️‍🩹 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔™ 💞

5 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC259 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Couple_Pictures_Videos_GifsPhoto

If a hug represented how much I loved you, I would hold you in my arms forever.❤️‍🩹 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔™ 💞

🥰5

3 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC411 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Couple_Pictures_Videos_GifsPhoto

By following my heart I came to you, I only forgot to take something back with me. For my thoughts are still with you.💖 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔™ 💞

1

2 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC444 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Couple_Pictures_Videos_GifsVideo

Gentle ❤️ 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔™ 💞

2🥰1

1 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC521 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Couple_Pictures_Videos_GifsPhoto

When we first met, we were total strangers but now I feel I know you more than anyone or anything in the world. You're my lover, my best friend.💞 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔™ 💞

2

30 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC615 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Couple_Pictures_Videos_GifsPhoto

Know that you are in my heart and you have my sympathy during these dreary times.❤️ 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔™ 💞

5👍1

29 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC639 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Couple_Pictures_Videos_GifsVideo

Always in my heart ❤️ 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔™ 💞

3

28 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC681 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Couple_Pictures_Videos_GifsPhoto

This kiss is the first one I've gotten and I'm sure it'll never be forgotten!💋❤️‍🔥 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔™ 💞

3

26 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC798 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Couple_Pictures_Videos_GifsPhoto

I'm so glad I found u. If I had to live my life over again, next time, I would find u sooner so I could love u longer.❤️ 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔™ 💞

4

24 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC891 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Couple_Pictures_Videos_GifsVideo

"The first kiss💋" 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔™ 💞

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Home_Of_Loves. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Couples” (@Home_Of_Loves), 3,036 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Home_Of_Loves.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.