Channel
@IA_Bots
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,695subscribers
+123 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001182887104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IA_Bots |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IA_Bots |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 15,695 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:03 | 15,698 | +12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:12 | 15,686 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 15,684 | +15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 15,669 | +8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 15,661 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 15,659 | +8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 15,651 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 15,645 | +12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 15,633 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 15,623 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 15,636 | +16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 15,620 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 15,616 | +16 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 15,600 | +10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 15,590 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 15,586 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 15,588 | +11 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 15,577 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 15,583 | first reading |
87 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 87 (1 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 68,096 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
📢 Modelos recientes de clonación de voz como IndexTTS-2 ya pueden separar, dentro de un audio, dos elementos que antes iban unidos: la identidad de quien habla y la emoción con la que habla, combinándolos después mediante técnicas de atención cruzada para producir cualquier mezcla que se desee. Lo que hace esto especialmente peligroso es su aplicación práctica en el fraude: un estafador puede tomar una muestra de la…
📢 El Real Decreto-Ley 7/2026, aprobado en España en abril de 2026, creó una nueva categoría legal de "alta prioridad" para conectarse a la red eléctrica, que agrupa en el mismo nivel administrativo a hospitales, cuerpos policiales, el ejército y los "proyectos estratégicos" de consumo industrial —una categoría que incluye a los grandes centros de datos de inteligencia artificial. Lo que revela esta decisión es una e…
📢 Sony y Warner demandan a Anthropic por usar música protegida en Claude. Es un conflicto clave de regulación que definirá si el entrenamiento de IA respeta la propiedad intelectual o requiere nuevas licencias. Un fallo que marcará el futuro del negocio creativo y tecnológico. 👁️ Hipertextual
📢 La UE eleva la vigilancia sobre OpenAI, Reddit y Roblox bajo la Ley de Servicios Digitales. Al ser consideradas plataformas sistémicas, deberán cumplir con estándares estrictos de seguridad y transparencia. Un paso clave en regulación para garantizar la responsabilidad digital. 👁️ Computer Hoy
📢 Para ganar eficiencia y ahorrar tokens, los programadores están adoptando el lenguaje de la IA. Es un cambio de paradigma donde el humano aprende el dialecto de la máquina para optimizar la productividad y la técnica. 👁️ Xataka
📢 Apple impulsa la IA con el nuevo Mac mini. Los chips M6 y M5 Pro elevan el rendimiento profesional en un formato compacto. Lo más relevante es la integración nativa de inteligencia artificial y la conectividad Wi-Fi 7, optimizando la productividad del usuario avanzado. 👁️ Teknófilo
📢 La IA ralentiza Windows 11? El punto clave es la percepción del usuario: existe un temor real al impacto del procesamiento en segundo plano. Microsoft debe priorizar la transparencia para que la innovación no se vea frenada por la desconfianza técnica. 👁️ Muycomputer.com
📢 Identificar textos de IA es clave para la veracidad informativa. El impacto en los usuarios es lo más relevante: ante la automatización, el pensamiento crítico se vuelve la herramienta esencial para validar contenidos y navegar con seguridad en el entorno digital. 👁️ Wired
📢 Apple redefine el estándar profesional con el Mac Studio M5 Ultra. Muy interesante su enfoque en IA: los 512 GB de memoria permiten ejecutar modelos masivos de forma local, sin depender de la nube. Un salto crucial en privacidad y potencia para creadores y desarrolladores. 👁️ Teknófilo
📢 En abril de 2026 Meta presentó TRIBEv2, un modelo de inteligencia artificial entrenado con más de 1.000 horas de datos de actividad cerebral recogidos a 720 personas, capaz de predecir cómo reacciona el cerebro humano ante un vídeo, un audio o un texto. Ya preocupa que una empresa privada acumule este tipo de información, porque a diferencia de una contraseña, un patrón cerebral no se puede cambiar si queda expuest…
📢 Google integra Gemini 3.5 Transcribe para dictar en cualquier campo web. El impacto más relevante es la mejora en la accesibilidad y productividad del usuario: esta integración universal facilita una interacción natural, reduciendo la dependencia del teclado en internet. 👁️ Computer Hoy
📢 OpenAI, Google y Anthropic piden blindar la ciberseguridad ante el avance de la IA. El aspecto más relevante es la paradoja de seguridad: proponen usar su propia IA como defensa ante los riesgos que ellos mismos generan, pero sin compromisos de inversión real todavía. 👁️ Xataka
Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @IA_Bots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Inteligencia Artificial 💡🤖” (@IA_Bots), 15,695 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IA_Bots.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.