Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for идиот

Channel

идиот

@IAbloid

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

420subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003000593315
TypeChannel
Username@IAbloid
DescriptionThere was a hole here, now it's gone
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/IAbloid

Growth

4209 Sept 2026, 17:47 — 420 subscribers9 Sept 2026, 18:22 — 420 subscribers9 Sept 2026, 17:479 Sept 2026, 18:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 419–421 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 18:22420no change
9 Sept 2026, 17:47420first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 18 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
89.6%
avg views ÷ 420 subscribers
Avg views / post
376
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held6 (18 August 20267 September 2026)
Views total1,881
Reactions total395
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
350
Videos
35
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

470 reactions across 6 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21946.6%
custom 53751816657798730748518.1%
👍428.94%
custom 5260404531719594367326.81%
🍓224.68%
💋224.68%
custom 5316588892999130062122.55%
🏆122.55%
🔥81.70%
🐳51.06%
custom 547233877811268625130.638%
🙏30.638%
🍾20.426%
💘10.213%
🤩10.213%
🥰10.213%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 470 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 6 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IAbloid. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 August 2026 to 7 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 18:00 UTC166 views85 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

Стараюсь параллельно чтото рисовать, но пока что основной фокус на зине

49custom 526040453171959436714🍓10🔥3💋2custom 53165888929991300622custom 53751816657798730742custom 54723387781126862512

28 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC339 views51 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Рисую иллюстрации для зина, не теряйте 👀👀👀

29custom 537518166577987307414💋6🐳2

24 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC480 views84 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

48custom 537518166577987307413🍓9custom 53165888929991300625🍾2💋2🔥2🙏2

24 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC484 views86 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

НИКОЛАС БРАУН, ДАЙ МНЕ ШАНС (ненавижу прически нулевых. А еще сейчас он 38 летний скуф 😢 мир желток)

52custom 537518166577987307415custom 526040453171959436713custom 53165888929991300623🐳1💘1🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC412 views89 reactions8 Starsread 9 September 2026
Photo

СЕГОДНЯ КАНАЛУ РОВНО ГОД 🥳🥳 Ого, я в огромном шоке, кажется что я так мало успела сделать за это время, но я очень рада что смогла закончить этот большой для меня проект именно в этот день (ура, я успела) Спасибо всем кто поддержал меня, наконецто я закончила, повторять подобный опыт в скором времени я не планирую, потомучто это было ОЧЕНЬ трудно. Надеюсь вам понравился мой мини комикс хотя бы чуть чуть 🥰

👍4024🏆12custom 53751816657798730745custom 52604045317195943674🔥2🍓1custom 53165888929991300621

18 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC577 views75 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

Лаааааадно 👀👀👀 (Дисклеймер еще в силе, кстати) Осталось совсем немного, я уже можно сказать на финишной прямой, спасибо за репосты и приятные комментарии 😻

custom 53751816657798730743617💋12🍓2👍2🤩1🥰1🙏1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @IAbloid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“идиот” (@IAbloid), 420 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IAbloid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.