Which of the following is non metal in nature?
- K3%
- Ca18%
- C17%
- N14%
- Both c and d47%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
๐1

Channel
@IBPS_AFO_EXAM2
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
15,737subscribers
-119 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001285115467 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IBPS_AFO_EXAM2 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IBPS_AFO_EXAM2 |
Education โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 15,737 | -3 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 15,740 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 15,742 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 15,745 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 15,748 | -11 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 15,759 | -18 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 15,777 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:03 | 15,776 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:52 | 15,777 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:27 | 15,784 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 15,786 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 15,788 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 15,792 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 15,799 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 15,802 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 15,804 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 15,807 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 15,814 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 15,821 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 15,823 | first reading |
90 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 90 (2 August 2026 โ 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 13,776 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
88 reactions across 58 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 49 | 55.7% | |
| ๐ | 32 | 36.4% | |
| ๐ฅ | 4 | 4.55% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 2 | 2.27% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 90 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Which of the following is non metal in nature?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
๐1
Which of the following is structural elements?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
โค2๐1
Which one of the following is not objective of puddling ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Buddha Jayanti Park is a example of____?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
๐2
Yellow colour of Onion
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
โค2
Pungency of chilli
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
๐2
Raksha bandhan offer is only active till tomorrow evening. Secure your seat now and start your preparation with IBPS pattern ๐ค
๐ THIS RAKSHA BANDHAN, GIFT YOUR SIBLING THE POWER OF PREPARATION! ๐ ๐ OFFICER 2.0 โ IBPS AFO MAINS TEST SERIES ๐ฑ This Raksha Bandhan, strengthen the bond of love and the bond of success! โค๏ธ ๐ฅ SPECIAL RAKSHA BANDHAN OFFER โ 85% OFF ๐ฅ ๐ What you get: โ 40 Mains-level Practice Tests โ 5 Full-Length Tests prepared by current AFOs โ 1:1 Mentorship โ Detailed Discussions & Concept Clarity โ Exam-Oriented Preparation โ โฆ
Clay particles play important role in aggregation because
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
โค2
The loose materials left behind by the glaciers form structureless mass called as
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
๐2
The phenotypic ratio of supplementary factor is ......
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
An organism derived from the union of gametes of dissimilar genetic constitution is called as .......
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
๐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @IBPS_AFO_EXAM2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 65 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which of the following is structural elements?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following is non metal in nature?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Buddha Jayanti Park is a example of____?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which one of the following is not objective of puddling ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Yellow colour of Onion
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Pungency of chilli
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โAgri _ vision2k21 โข ๐พ๐พโ๏ธยฉ ๐ข๐ณ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐นโขโ (@IBPS_AFO_EXAM2), 15,737 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IBPS_AFO_EXAM2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.