Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
41 measurements spanning 74 days, net -107. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,020–22,159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Oct 2026, 17:44
22,036
-5
18 Oct 2026, 16:56
22,041
-9
17 Oct 2026, 15:01
22,050
-7
16 Oct 2026, 15:19
22,057
-3
15 Oct 2026, 18:28
22,060
-7
14 Oct 2026, 21:18
22,067
-11
13 Oct 2026, 13:07
22,078
-24
9 Oct 2026, 13:55
22,102
+9
5 Oct 2026, 07:39
22,093
+3
28 Sept 2026, 22:02
22,090
-8
17 Sept 2026, 22:22
22,098
+4
14 Sept 2026, 02:19
22,094
+2
12 Sept 2026, 06:55
22,092
+5
10 Sept 2026, 02:21
22,087
+3
6 Sept 2026, 19:41
22,084
-2
4 Sept 2026, 06:39
22,086
+10
2 Sept 2026, 16:45
22,076
+22
1 Sept 2026, 18:12
22,054
+3
31 Aug 2026, 20:57
22,051
-7
30 Aug 2026, 19:58
22,058
first reading
Engagement
203 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.02%
avg views ÷ 22,036 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,990
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.832%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 203 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held
203 (3 August 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total
129,253
Reactions total
1,075
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Oct 2026, 23:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 47m
Average length
1m 48s
Measured directly from 93 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,606 reactions across 203 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
1,142
31.7%
❤
881
24.4%
👍
852
23.6%
👌
275
7.63%
🙏
106
2.94%
😨
75
2.08%
💯
74
2.05%
🍾
72
2.00%
✍
41
1.14%
🤩
26
0.721%
❤🔥
13
0.361%
🏆
11
0.305%
👨💻
7
0.194%
🎉
6
0.166%
🤝
6
0.166%
🕊
4
0.111%
😍
4
0.111%
🤗
4
0.111%
😘
3
0.083%
🥰
3
0.083%
1 further kind
1
0.028%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 203 of the 203 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,606 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 203 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Quali maschere stai indossando senza saperlo?
Ce ne sono di così sottili da sembrare una seconda pelle. Le portiamo da tanto tempo, attaccate al volto, che non riusciamo più a distinguerle da noi stessi. Forse è capitato anche a te di sentirti un po’ stretto dentro un ruolo, senza capire bene da dove venisse quella sensazione.
Il quarto incontro del webinar di Ensitiv, “Kaivalya”, è dedicato proprio a questo: impar…
Il primo incontro del nuovo webinar del Dottor Massimo Pietrangeli, dal titolo ‘Percorso di Medicina Integrata e Naturopatia’ sarà dedicato a DNA e Fotoni.Esploreremo l’interazione tra la luce e l’informazione genetica, per comprendere che non siamo soltanto chimica, ma esseri bio-fotonici, sensibili alla luce.
Capire questo cambia lo sguardo su di sé, sulla salute e sul proprio modo di prendersene cura.
Ti aspet…
Chi era Rama, il condottiero che la leggenda lega alle montagne della Valsusa? Cosa raccontano le incisioni rupestri, le mura preistoriche e gli altari scolpiti nella roccia di questa valle? È vero che qui si nasconde il ricordo di un'antica civiltà "atlantidea" e dei suoi giganti?
In questa live ne parliamo con Andrea Cogerino, ricercatore e guida, tra mito, archeologia e storia. Vediamo cosa dicono le pietre, dove…
Perché ci ammaliamo, se il nostro corpo è programmato per guarire?
Giovedì 8 ottobre alle 20:00 Natale Petti ti guida in un webinar gratuito online su:
i 7 principi del Kybalion
le 5 ferite dell'infanzia e le maschere che indossiamo
la BioPsicoQuantistica®️ come nuova visione di salute
I posti sono limitati: iscriviti gratis qui → https://www.eventbrite.it/e/webinar-gratuito-di-natale-petti-tickets-2000049682440?a…
Vuoi conoscere Soft Trading a 360°?
Giovedì 8 ottobre, ore 21:00: presentazione ufficiale, gratuita e online, con Lorenzo Vaccarella.
Ti spieghiamo tutto, dalla A alla Z:
chi è l'azienda
il settore in cui lavoriamo
come e quando operiamo
le nostre certificazioni
È una delle presentazioni più complete: se hai curiosità o dubbi, è il momento giusto per toglierteli.
I posti sono limitati: iscriviti gratis qui → htt…
Algoritmi, Sette e Apocalisse: chi controlla il futuro della mente?
Webinar gratuito con la D.ssa Mara Macrì
Mercoledì 7 ottobre, ore 18:00, online
Pensi di scegliere liberamente cosa guardare e a cosa credere? Gli algoritmi sono diventati i nuovi oracoli e le "sette" si muovono sui social.
La D.ssa Mara Macrì è giornalista, sociologa e studiosa dei nuovi culti. In questo incontro presenta il ciclo di 10 webinar ch…
LIVE STRAORDINARIA – 7 ottobre, ore 12:00
L'Europa sta perdendo credibilità, potere e fiducia dei cittadini. Ma se tutto questo facesse parte di un disegno più grande?
In questa live vi porto 10 passaggi che, messi in fila, raccontano uno scenario preoccupante: un'Europa fatta apparire antidemocratica e impotente, per lasciare spazio a una governance mondiale. Il pretesto sarebbe un'intelligenza artificiale "imposs…
Un articolo di Money dedicato a Softi
https://www.money.it/softi-evolve-intelligenza-artificiale-trading-automatizzato-e-smart-automation-al-centro-della-nuova-fase
👍6👏3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 203 posts we hold for @INZAIONLELIVE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INZAION di Luca Nali” (@INZAIONLELIVE), 22,036 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/INZAIONLELIVE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.