24 measurements spanning 29 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,390–13,431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 09:57
13,399
+2
3 Sept 2026, 00:56
13,397
-1
2 Sept 2026, 00:24
13,398
+2
31 Aug 2026, 23:36
13,396
+1
30 Aug 2026, 22:34
13,395
-1
28 Aug 2026, 23:18
13,396
-2
27 Aug 2026, 23:04
13,398
-3
27 Aug 2026, 00:28
13,401
-6
25 Aug 2026, 21:44
13,407
-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:45
13,408
-4
23 Aug 2026, 03:17
13,412
+1
21 Aug 2026, 12:36
13,411
-3
20 Aug 2026, 08:46
13,414
+2
19 Aug 2026, 10:15
13,412
-7
18 Aug 2026, 07:41
13,419
-2
17 Aug 2026, 10:34
13,421
-5
15 Aug 2026, 19:35
13,426
+2
14 Aug 2026, 07:37
13,424
+3
12 Aug 2026, 04:12
13,421
+1
10 Aug 2026, 05:27
13,420
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.9%
avg views ÷ 13,399 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,020
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.891%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
30 (30 June 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
60,190
Reactions total
536
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,703 reactions across 30 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
613
36.0%
❤
427
25.1%
🔥
308
18.1%
👍
200
11.7%
🎉
116
6.81%
👏
28
1.64%
🤝
11
0.646%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,703 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 30 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IUENG. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The Mid-Autumn Festival Event, Operation Luna, has started and it brought some interesting new sights on the Ingress Scanner!
🍂 Leaves have started falling in the Scanner! Enable Seasonal Effects in the settings to see them!
🙋Hank Johnson or Debra Bogdanovich will alert the Agent's about the newly started Campaign, suggesting to visit the Dispatch screen. Once there, more details about the Event will be shared by t…
Niantic announced all details on the event for September, Operation Luna, celebrating the Mid-Autumn Festival!
The event will run from September 1st @ 1800 UTC to September 30th @ 1800 UTC.
During this event, the Ingress Scanner will feature the following temporary changes:
🔸 Portal Key drop guaranteed upon hacking if the Key is not already owned (does not apply to Drone Hacks)
🔸 Peace Beacon and a newly added Toa…
22 days remain until we can find out the outcome of the two final Anomalies of the Apollo Series: Singapore and Denver, CO, USA.
Curious about where in the city these events will be played?
The playboxes for these upcoming Apollo XM Anomalies are highlighted on the Intel Map!
In Singapore, 304 portals have been ornamented in a 1km by 1.6km playbox. In the Central Business District of Denver, the playbox is about 1k…
Apollo Series - Paris Anomaly Event
Battle Beacons
Raw Score
🔸547 - 801🔸
Final Score
🔸40.6 - 59.4🔸
Shard Battle
Raw Score
🔸74+26+42 - 23+56+58🔸
Final Score
🔸50.9 - 49.1🔸
Anomaly Uniques
Average (mid 80%)
🔸126.41 - 119.72🔸
Final Score
🔸41.1 - 38.9🔸
GORUCK Stealth Ops
🚫 Cancelled
GORUCK Urban Ops
🚫 Cancelled
Total Score
🔸132.6 - 147.4🔸
🔵 The Resistance captures the Apollo Anomaly in Paris!
Source: https://ingres…
There has been an update to the scores for Seoul.
Shard Battle
Raw Score
🔸81+76+46 - 27+33+50 (+7)🔸
Final Score
🔸64.9 - 35.1 (+0.8)🔸
Total Score
🔸170.9 - 129.1🔸
The original post will be updated to reflect this change.
@IUENG
This weekend is an Anomaly Weekend!
Agents are gathering in 🇰🇷Seoul, Korea and 🇫🇷 Paris, France for the second to last Anomaly weekend of the Apollo Season.
As it stands, the Resistance leads the series:
🔸406.9 - 455.4🔸
As previously announced, the official GORUCK events in Paris are cancelled, but the local Orga team and the community have created a NoCF Event as a substitution (with prizes for the winners!)
Act…
🔕 The blog post has been updated to clarify that you can only get 10,000 Tokens in total instead of 17,500 Tokens total as some people have assumed based on how the rewards were listed. Our post has been edited accordingly and now shows the correct Token rewards per Assignment.
@IUENG
Details for the Apollo Global Op have been revealed, featuring a focus on deploying and destroying mods!
The Event will run from 26 August 2026 at 18:00 UTC and concludes 16 September 2026 at 18:00 UTC and feature a Campaign with rewards. As usual, you will work for your faction and yourself to earn as many "Apollo Mod Battle Points" as possible. There are three ways to earn Apollo Mod Battle Points:
Destroying a m…
🎒Agents, GORUCK Events need you!
As many of you may know, each Anomaly weekend also hosts add-on events organized by GORUCK in collaboration with Ingress.
These events are competitive and feed directly into your faction's Anomaly score, so showing up actually moves the needle for the Resistance or the Enlightened.
Beyond the faction points, though, this is your chance to push past what you thought you could do. A r…
While the "The Corporations" Campaigns were supposed to go online a few minutes ago (and, according to Niantic, are already online: https://t.me/NianticOfficial/1214), the Scanner currently shows that the event is not yet online and is currently planned for 00:00 UTC instead of the originally planned 18:00 UTC.
You are already able to buy the three premium campaigns from the store, however they also do not appear in…
👎28❤4🔥1
Signed Tobias 🏳️🌈
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @IUENG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@IUENG edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🐘氣象巴打🟢 @weatherjj · 43,036 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
法庭文字直播台 @youarenotalonehk_live · 32,323 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ingress Updates [ENG]” (@IUENG), 13,399 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IUENG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
![Telegram profile photo for Ingress Updates [ENG]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/ab/ab2e741c3efabd2538296f0b97ff7e5ecf39dcc02e575c61fd116b9eb0037344.jpg)