Bot

𝐓𝐀𝐑𝐀 .

@IWDbot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

16,521monthly users

-3,801 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID	5474979155
Type	Bot
Username	@IWDbot
First recorded	16 August 2026
Last confirmed live	3 November 2026
Measurements held	47
Confirmed unchanged	2 times, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegram	t.me/IWDbot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

47 measurements spanning 86 days, net -3,801. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,502–20,951 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)	Monthly users	Change
2 Nov 2026, 20:27	16,521	-15
1 Nov 2026, 21:46	16,536	+129
31 Oct 2026, 01:57	16,407	-73
30 Oct 2026, 01:21	16,480	+349
28 Oct 2026, 22:40	16,131	-504
26 Oct 2026, 23:16	16,635	-67
26 Oct 2026, 00:40	16,702	-117
22 Oct 2026, 23:28	16,819	-103
21 Oct 2026, 18:46	16,922	-123
20 Oct 2026, 13:41	17,045	-83
19 Oct 2026, 12:56	17,128	-132
18 Oct 2026, 14:36	17,260	-108
17 Oct 2026, 15:07	17,368	-216
15 Oct 2026, 12:40	17,584	-6
14 Oct 2026, 13:17	17,590	-73
13 Oct 2026, 03:27	17,663	-344
8 Oct 2026, 17:18	18,007	-634
4 Oct 2026, 04:37	18,641	-250
25 Sept 2026, 09:57	18,891	-120
18 Sept 2026, 21:57	19,011	first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

مــۘڶــــوڪ₱.ٲٳڶڪـــبرٖيٲٳء☆
@Alastoora_Aehab · 381 post ⊱-❥┊وهـمツ┊𝒘𝒂𝒉𝒎༒
@Iloveyouu2 · 371 post (╽طيــ⛲️ــرمانه ذماريه :)
@qrtyjh · 441 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

اللطفاء
@fa772nf · 54 posts ذايب .
@meeri_62 · 2661 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐓𝐀𝐑𝐀 .” (@IWDbot), 16,521 monthly users as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IWDbot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.