Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Portal Ibis

Channel

Portal Ibis

@IbisPortal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,943subscribers

+49 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002653164506
TypeChannel
Username@IbisPortal
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/IbisPortal

Growth

1,8941,9431,918.56 August 2026 — 1,894 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,895 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,900 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,902 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,904 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,911 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,915 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,927 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,933 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,938 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,943 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 34 days, net +49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,887–1,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 09:201,943+5
31 Aug 2026, 18:061,938+5
28 Aug 2026, 19:271,933+6
25 Aug 2026, 13:041,927+12
22 Aug 2026, 20:031,915+4
19 Aug 2026, 14:511,911+7
16 Aug 2026, 06:461,904+2
13 Aug 2026, 04:041,902+2
10 Aug 2026, 02:011,900+5
6 Aug 2026, 17:001,895+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:471,894first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2838.4%
👍1824.7%
❤‍🔥811.0%
🤩56.85%
🦄45.48%
🔥34.11%
🤔34.11%
🫡22.74%
👌11.37%
🕊11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC11 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Emblem XXXIV. L'Ame amante de son Dieu, representees dans les emblemes de Hermannus Hugo, c. 1717 by Guyon, Jeanne-Marie This emblem illustrates a passage from the Song of Solomon ('I am my beloved's, and his desire is toward me'). It depicts the Soul (Anima) interacting with Divine Love, symbolized by a winged child, while a sunflower in the background mirrors their spiritual orientation by turning toward the sun,

7 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC78 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

In the ancient myth, Narcissus was a beautiful young man who rejected those who loved him. As punishment, he fell in love with his own reflection in a pool of water, not realizing at first that the face he desired was his own. Unable to possess the image before him or turn away from it, he slowly wasted away beside the water. The story is tragic not simply because Narcissus loves himself, but because he becomes trap

👍21🔥1🦄1

7 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Marble capital and finial in the form of a sphinx Greek, Attic ca. 530 BCE

❤‍🔥1👌1🦄1

6 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC161 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Emblem XLI depicting the Soul riding a stag toward a fountain of Divine Love. L'Ame amante de son Dieu, representees dans les emblemes de Hermannus Hugo, c. 1717 by Guyon, Jeanne-Marie This emblem illustrates Psalm 42: 'As the deer pants for streams of water, so my soul pants for you, my God.' It depicts the Soul personified as a woman riding a stag toward a fountain where representing Divine Love, stands with arms

3🦄2

6 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC149 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Apollonio di Giovanni: The Triumph of Love, c. 1460, Victoria & Albert Museum In Petrarch’s Triumph of Love, Cupid rides in a victorious procession, followed by gods, heroes, poets, and rulers conquered by desire. Even strength, wisdom, and fame are powerless before Love. Petrarch himself becomes one of Love’s captives after seeing Laura, though this earthly passion will later be defeated by Chastity.

👍31❤‍🔥1🫡1

6 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC135 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Pietro Perugino: Combat of Love and Chastity, c. 1503 Renaissance artists often explored the conflict between Love and Chastity because it united Christian morality, classical mythology, and humanist philosophy. In Perugino’s The Battle between Love and Chastity, Venus and Cupid represent sensual desire, while Pallas and Diana embody reason, self-control, and purity. The subject was also influenced by Petrarch’s Tri

4🫡1

6 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC145 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Allegory of Fortune — attributed to Giovanni Bellini or Andrea Previtali, c. 1490 – 1500

6❤‍🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 00:59 UTC136 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Giovanni Bellini’s Four Allegories, painted around 1490, are four small panels representing Perseverance, Falsehood, Fortune, and Prudence. Originally created to decorate a Venetian dressing cabinet, these images combine classical symbolism with Renaissance moral philosophy.

3❤‍🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC90 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

A Terracotta Model of a Sphinx Mid-19th Century

🤩21❤‍🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC91 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gherardo di Giovanni del Fora - The Combat of Love and Chastity, c. 1475-1500 The Combat of Love and Chastity shows Cupid’s arrow breaking on Chastity’s shield, while she threatens him with chains.

3

6 Aug 2026, 00:05 UTC83 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

The Beast of the Apocalypse and the Righteous Soul. Laurent d’Orléans, La Somme le Roi, c. 1294, BnF, Français 938, fol. 8v.

👍21❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC79 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

L'Ame amante de son Dieu, representees dans les emblemes de Hermannus Hugo, c. 1717 by Guyon, Jeanne-Marie This emblem depicts the Soul (Anima) navigating the complex labyrinth of worldly life. Guided by a divine thread that leads to a beacon-like tower where an angel watches, the image visualizes the spiritual path toward divine.

❤‍🔥2👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @IbisPortal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Portal Ibis” (@IbisPortal), 1,943 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IbisPortal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.