@eighty3ight_88
โก16โค7

Channel
@Ieighty3ight_88
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
1,075subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002616492092 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ieighty3ight_88 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ieighty3ight_88 |
Other / unclassifiable โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 1,075 | +5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 1,070 | +9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:06 | 1,061 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 1,066 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 1,062 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 1,058 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 1,056 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 1,055 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 1,060 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 1,054 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 1,052 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
667 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐คฃ | 217 | 32.5% | |
| โก | 129 | 19.3% | |
| ๐ฏ | 76 | 11.4% | |
| ๐ | 68 | 10.2% | |
| ๐ฅ | 57 | 8.55% | |
| โค | 47 | 7.05% | |
| ๐ฉ | 22 | 3.30% | |
| ๐คก | 19 | 2.85% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 0.9% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 0.6% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 0.6% | |
| ๐คฎ | 4 | 0.6% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 0.45% | |
| ๐คฉ | 3 | 0.45% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 0.3% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 0.3% | |
| ๐ณ | 1 | 0.15% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.15% | |
| ๐ก | 1 | 0.15% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 1 | 0.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 667 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@eighty3ight_88
โก16โค7
@eighty3ight_88 ๐คฃ
๐คฃ19โค4๐4๐1๐คก1
@eighty3ight_88 ๐คฃ
๐ฉ22โค1๐คก1๐คฎ1๐1
@eighty3ight_88
๐ฅ18๐6๐2๐คก1๐คฃ1๐คฎ1
@eighty3ight_88
๐ฅ21โก6๐คก1
@eighty3ight_88 ๐คฃ
๐คฃ30๐2๐คก1
@eighty3ight_88
โก27โค10๐คก1๐ฅฐ1๐1
@eighty3ight_88 ๐คฃ
๐19๐คก1๐คฃ1
@eighty3ight_88 ๐คฃ
๐คฃ35๐3๐3๐คฎ2๐คก1
@eighty3ight_88
โก22๐ฅ4๐คก1
@eighty3ight_88 ๐คฃ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9jbIRb3Bd8
๐คฃ24๐4๐ฏ3โค1๐คก1
@eighty3ight_88 ๐คฃ
๐คฃ32๐ฅ3๐ณ1๐คก1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ieighty3ight_88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐88 แๅแโ (@Ieighty3ight_88), 1,075 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ieighty3ight_88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.