Because once is never enough, looking forward to teaming up with my decades long friend @ sachastone and the gang for a wonderful conversation.

Channel
Hart2Hart
@IllyseHart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001640325967 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IllyseHart |
| Description | #WWG1WGA #NCSWIC #IYKYK #MAGA 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸😎❤️🙏❤️🤠 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IllyseHart |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 11 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 11 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,610
- Videos
- ≈4,900
- Links
- ≈5,920
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 13m 20s
- Average length
- 1m 54s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Over 155 scientists and doctors signed a letter telling politicians to stop “harassing” Anthony Fauci. They’re calling questions about COVID origins, gain-of-function research, and pandemic policies “witch-hunts.” Interesting how quickly the medical establishment circles the wagons when one of their own faces real scrutiny. Accountability isn’t harassment.
Dem: “Dr. Schwartz— RFK JR refused to say Vitamin K is safe for newborns— will you confirm for us today that Vitamin K shots are safe and will you recommend parents get the shots for their babies?” Schwartz: Yes, the Vitamin K shot is safe, and I recommend all parents give it to their babies. Um. No. Fook your needles and the slop within it. Please follow us @ZFoundation
KunstlerCast 449 — Dr. David Martin on The Covid Op and Matters of National Survival 👆👆 Here's my recent podcast with @ Jhkunstler ... play to the end to hear about 2028.
If a car seat company couldn’t be sued for a defective product that injured or killed children… would you still put your baby in it? Vaccine manufacturers have been protected from almost all lawsuits since 1986. Same product. Same risk to children. Zero accountability. They took away the one thing that keeps every other industry honest.
Dr. Fauci should be in a prison cell for what he did to us. Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES
Dr. Fauci should be in a prison cell for what he did to us. Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES
Dr. W. B. Clark publicly stated in 1909, that cancer was ‘practically unknown’ before cowpox vaccination, and that in more than 200 cancer cases he had treated, he had never seen one in an unvaccinated person. If one experienced physician was seeing this pattern over a century ago… how many others noticed the same thing and were ignored or silenced? Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES
Characterizing this as "justice" is like giving Stalin a "timeout"! This is NOT JUSTICE and We The People Must not be misled by the Republican Oversight Committee Chair @ RepJamesComer into believing otherwise. He's a RICO violating criminal and Justice is BARS, not funding suspension for 5 years. https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Dr.-Peter-Daszak-HHS-Notice_Jan-17-2025_Redacted.pdf
👆👆👆👆 Just in case fact-checkers can't do their work... "Biowarfare" is their words, not mine
👆👆👆👆 Remember in 2023, this was presented to the EU PARLIAMENT and seen around the world. @SenRonJohnsonUS and @ SenRandPaul had no willingness to hold anyone accountable for the US bioweapons program
Before @SenRonJohnsonUS and @ SenRandPaul hold the contempt vote on @ DrTonyFauciMD, let's remember to keep the #PatriotAct in mind.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @IllyseHart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hart2Hart” (@IllyseHart), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IllyseHart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.