Posted without readable text
❤2

Channel
@Impfgefluester
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,810subscribers
-88 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001846512487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Impfgefluester |
| Created | 4 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Impfgefluester |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:47 | 3,810 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:44 | 3,812 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:51 | 3,815 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:15 | 3,816 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:44 | 3,822 | +1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:11 | 3,821 | -3 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 20:29 | 3,824 | -3 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 21:20 | 3,827 | -12 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 10:54 | 3,839 | -10 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 3,849 | -16 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 3,865 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 3,868 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 3,871 | -13 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 3,884 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 3,889 | +4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 3,885 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 3,887 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 3,883 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 3,886 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 3,893 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
252 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 115 | 45.6% | |
| ❤ | 92 | 36.5% | |
| 🎄 | 22 | 8.73% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 4.37% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 3.57% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤2
Liebe Impfgeflüster Fans! Wir bitten um Verzeihung, daß sie so lange nichts von uns gehört haben. Leider haben uns einige freiwillige Mitarbeiter verlassen. Wir verstehen das Familie und Job ihren Stellenwert haben. Wir bedanken uns herzlich für die ausgezeichnete Arbeit. Die Sommerpause nützen wir für eine Neuaufstellung des Teams! Die Produktion und die Recherche ist sehr Zeitaufwendig. Wäre es für sie denkbar a…
👍19❤7
@IMPFGEFLÜSTER Staffel 6 I Folge#6 Erschreckende Informationen über von der Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation finanzierte Studien! MRT-Scans von Babies für KI Datenbanken „Baby Open Brains“. Einbalsamierung toter Säuglinge für minimal invasive Autopsien. 👉Quellen👈 (abgerufen November 2025) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40839335/ 2025 Aug 21. Exploring minimally invasive tissue sampling as an alternative to convent…
❤4
@IMPFGEFLÜSTER Staffel 6 I Folge#6 👉Audio👈 Erschreckende Informationen über von der Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation finanzierte Studien! MRT-Scans von Babies für KI Datenbanken „Baby Open Brains“. Einbalsamierung toter Säuglinge für minimal invasive Autopsien. 👉Alle Quellen findet ihr im extra Anhang👈 Alle #IMPFGEFLÜSTER Texte & Videos in voller Länge nur auf Telegram! Bitte abonnieren! Wir sind unter Shaddow Ba…
❤5👍2
@IMPFGEFLÜSTER Staffel 6 I Folge#6 https://rumble.com/v75mks6-impfgeflster-staffel-6-folge-6.html 👉Rumble👈 Erschreckende Informationen über von der Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation finanzierte Studien! MRT-Scans von Babies für KI Datenbanken „Baby Open Brains“. Einbalsamierung toter Säuglinge für minimal invasive Autopsien. Alle #IMPFGEFLÜSTER Texte & Videos in voller Länge nur auf Telegram! Bitte abonnieren! Wir…
❤5
@IMPFGEFLÜSTER Staffel 6 I Folge#6 👉PDF zum Download👈 Erschreckende Informationen über von der Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation finanzierte Studien! MRT-Scans von Babies für KI Datenbanken „Baby Open Brains“ Einbalsamierung toter Säuglinge für minimal invasive Autopsien. Alle #IMPFGEFLÜSTER Texte & Videos in voller Länge nur auf Telegram! Bitte abonnieren! Wir sind unter Shaddow Ban! 🔗 Telegram (https://t.me/Imp…
👍6❤2
@IMPFGEFLÜSTER Staffel 6 I Folge#6 Erschreckende Informationen über von der Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation finanzierte Studien! MRT-Scans von Babies für KI Datenbanken „Baby Open Brains“ Einbalsamierung toter Säuglinge für minimal invasive Autopsien. Alle #IMPFGEFLÜSTER Texte & Videos in voller Länge nur auf Telegram! Bitte abonnieren! Wir sind unter Shaddow Ban! 🔗 Telegram (https://t.me/Impfgefluester) 🔗 Yout…
🔥7❤3😱3👍2
Liebe # IMPFGEFLÜSTER Fans! Wir wünschen Ihnen und Ihren Familien und Freunden ein wunderschönes Weihnachtsfest und ein gutes neues Jahr 🎄 2026! Es ist die besinnliche Zeit im Jahr um mit unseren Lieben das Leben zu feiern und unsere Traditionen an unsere Kinder weiterzugeben. ❤️ Wir freuen uns auf das nächste Jahr auf ein " Wiederhören" Liebe Grüße ihr # IMPFGEFLÜSTER Team ❤️❤️❤️
🎄22❤10🥰9
Liebe #IMPFGEFLÜSTER Fans! Es war jetzt ein bisschen ruhig auf unserem Kanal. Wir haben bereits neue, sehr aufregende Folgen vorbereitet. Unser Sprecher Chefredakteur Florian Machl war beruflich unterwegs und konnte aus Zeitgründen die spannenden, aktuellen Folgen noch nicht einsprechen. Es geht in Kürze weiter! Sorry für die Verzögerung! LG Ihr #IMPFGEFLÜSTER Team ❤️
❤34👍23
@IMPFGEFLÜSTER Staffel 6 I Folge#5 👉Quellen👈 (abgerufen Oktober 2025) Dokument: complaint2.pdf Klage Impfplan USA: Gerichtsdaten Aktenzeichen: Thomas v. Monarez, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 1:25-cv-02685; Datum: 15. August 2025 https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/cdcs-aggressive-child-vaccine-program-targeted-in-lawsuit Das "aggressive" Kinderimpfprogramm der CDC zielt a…
👍5❤2
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract Masern Studie 1968 https://tkp.at/2024/12/28/kennedy-rechtsanwalt-siri-bei-tucker-ueber-wirkung-von-impfungen-und-der-forderung-nach-ordentlichen-studien/ https://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e7856/rr/620395 Belief not science is behind flu jab promotion, new report says doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7856 (Published 19 November 2012) https://www.fda.gov/medi…
👍9❤6
@IMPFGEFLÜSTER Staffel 6 I Folge#5 👉Audio👈 Klage gegen die CDC in den USA eingereicht! Es existieren nur Einzelstudien zu Impfstoffen für kurze Zeiträume. Weder Sicherheit noch Auswirkungen auf den Organismus der Kinder durch die CDC untersucht! Alle #IMPFGEFLÜSTER Texte & Videos in voller Länge nur auf Telegram! Bitte abonnieren! Wir sind unter Shaddow Ban! 🔗 Telegram (https://t.me/Impfgefluester) 🔗 Youtube (…
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Impfgefluester. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Impfgefluester named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“# IMPFGEFLÜSTER” (@Impfgefluester), 3,810 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Impfgefluester.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.