Film & TV β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
36,300 average views per post against 42,324 subscribers β an engagement rate of 85.7%. Across the 3,666 registered channels in the same cohort β 31,636β99,982 subscribers, posting mainly in English β the middle half sit between 1.75% and 11.1%, with a median of 5.05%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (10 August 2026 β 9 September 2026)
Posts measured
13 of 13 published in the window (1 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
471,670
Mature posts only
92.8% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3Γ away from that cohortβs median β above it β on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes β audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelβs own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 9 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through β we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 33 days, net +3,665. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 37,844β44,205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 23:38
42,243
-81
6 Sept 2026, 15:57
42,324
-82
4 Sept 2026, 08:22
42,406
+17
3 Sept 2026, 00:43
42,389
-51
2 Sept 2026, 01:47
42,440
-38
31 Aug 2026, 23:28
42,478
-42
30 Aug 2026, 21:45
42,520
-46
29 Aug 2026, 19:05
42,566
-23
28 Aug 2026, 16:17
42,589
-9
27 Aug 2026, 18:05
42,598
-49
26 Aug 2026, 14:33
42,647
-34
25 Aug 2026, 16:38
42,681
-58
24 Aug 2026, 19:07
42,739
-100
23 Aug 2026, 02:57
42,839
-65
21 Aug 2026, 14:44
42,904
-65
20 Aug 2026, 12:42
42,969
-76
19 Aug 2026, 12:38
43,045
-74
18 Aug 2026, 12:56
43,119
-67
17 Aug 2026, 14:05
43,186
-285
16 Aug 2026, 08:44
43,471
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
86.7%
avg views Γ· 42,243 subscribers
Avg views / post
36,600
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.012%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held
32 (28 July 2026 β 6 September 2026)
Views total
476,170
Reactions total
53
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 23:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Links
17
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 9 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
172 reactions across 24 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
β€
130
75.6%
π₯
19
11.0%
π
8
4.65%
β€βπ₯
7
4.07%
π
3
1.74%
π
2
1.16%
π
1
0.581%
π€‘
1
0.581%
π₯°
1
0.581%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Lanterns S01 E01 Added β€οΈβπ₯
Toy Story 5 ( HD ) β€οΈβπ₯
The End of Oak Street β€οΈβπ₯
X-Men '97 S02 ( Finished ) π€
Reacher S04 E04 π₯
Ted Lasso S04 E03 π₯
Skeleton Knight in Another World S02 E07 π₯
Tomb Rider King S01 E07π₯
Saga Of Tanya S02 E07π₯
Grand Blue S03 E07π₯
βββββββββββ
β€οΈβπ₯JOIN FOR MORE (Index Channel)β€οΈβπ₯
β€οΈβπ₯JOIN MAIN CHANNEL (In Case of Any Copyrights)β€οΈβπ₯
The Odyssey ( Almost HD ) β€οΈβπ₯
Link Click S03 E01&E02 β€οΈβπ₯
Bleach: TYBW S04 E04 π₯
One Piece E1174 π₯
Mushoku Tensei S03 E08 π₯
The Walking Dead: Dead City S03 E04 π₯
Detective Conan E1209 π₯
That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime S04 E18 π₯
Daemons of The Shadow Realm S01 E19 π₯
My Adventure With Superman S03 E10 π₯
House Of The Dragon ( Copyright Fix ) βοΈ
Silo ( Copyright Fix ) βοΈ
From ( Copyright Fix ) βοΈ
Fβ¦
I just received another $404 from DOLLAR TREE π³ platform π€
This is my 3rd withdrawal now π
Platform launched recently and itβs paying massively π―
CHANNEL: @Dollar_Tree_Official
Donβt miss out πΈ
Sign up below β¬οΈ
π€‘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @Index_For_ETY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Index_For_ETY edited 6 posts after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it. The 16 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
14
handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
10
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Index_For_ETY named 14 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant β a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@x_men_97_season_2_1_3 named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 β 16 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 25 August 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@tomb_raider_king_season_1_2 named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 β 16 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 25 August 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@my_adventures_with_superman_3_2 named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 β 16 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 25 August 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@ted_lasso_season_4_3_5 named in 7 posts, 9 August 2026 β 16 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 30 August 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@silo_season_3_2_1_4 named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 β 14 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 15 August 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@house_of_the_dragon_season_2_4_3 named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 β 14 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 16 August 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@reacher_season_4_3_2 named in 3 posts, 13 August 2026 β 16 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 24 August 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@link_click_season_3_2_1 named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 β 16 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 24 August 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@rick_and_morty_season_8_9_7 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 β 8 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 25 August 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@agent_kim_reactivated_season_1_2 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 β 8 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 28 August 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
@ted_lasso_season_4_3 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 β 8 August 2026
@the_walking_dead_dead_city_s_3_2 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 β 8 August 2026
@mushoku_tensei_season_3_2 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 β 8 August 2026
@bleach_thousand_year_blood_war_9 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 β 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βIndex For ETY β€οΈβπ₯β (@Index_For_ETY), 42,243 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Index_For_ETY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.