Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Moonlight

Channel

Moonlight

@InsanityTalk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,996subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001555344443
TypeChannel
Username@InsanityTalk
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/InsanityTalk

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,9963,0533,024.520 August 2026 — 3,053 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,050 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,043 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,039 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,035 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,030 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,014 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,014 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,999 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,996 subscribers20 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 27 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,987–3,062 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 04:212,996-3
12 Sept 2026, 05:592,999-15
11 Sept 2026, 13:503,014no change
7 Sept 2026, 21:013,014-16
3 Sept 2026, 01:553,030-5
31 Aug 2026, 07:153,035-4
28 Aug 2026, 01:383,039-4
24 Aug 2026, 16:583,043-7
21 Aug 2026, 10:073,050-3
20 Aug 2026, 11:003,053first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

﮼موزیکای‌ قفلیمون🔒
@MusicQoflie · 56,286
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
فاضل نظری
@fazelnazarigram · 39,143
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Moonlight” (@InsanityTalk), 2,996 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InsanityTalk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.