Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for InstaOFF

Bot

InstaOFF

@InstaOFFbot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

12,759monthly users

-6,290 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID5671986349
TypeBot
Username@InstaOFFbot
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/InstaOFFbot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,75919,04915,9046 August 2026 — 19,049 monthly users7 August 2026 — 18,249 monthly users11 August 2026 — 17,077 monthly users11 August 2026 — 16,840 monthly users13 August 2026 — 16,639 monthly users16 August 2026 — 16,008 monthly users18 August 2026 — 16,008 monthly users18 August 2026 — 15,167 monthly users22 August 2026 — 14,360 monthly users23 August 2026 — 14,083 monthly users27 August 2026 — 13,749 monthly users28 August 2026 — 13,665 monthly users30 August 2026 — 13,511 monthly users31 August 2026 — 13,073 monthly users3 September 2026 — 13,193 monthly users9 September 2026 — 13,079 monthly users11 September 2026 — 12,942 monthly users13 September 2026 — 12,759 monthly users6 August 202613 September 2026
18 measurements spanning 38 days, net -6,290. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,816–19,993 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)Monthly usersChange
13 Sept 2026, 11:4212,759-183
11 Sept 2026, 18:1812,942-137
9 Sept 2026, 05:2013,079-114
3 Sept 2026, 17:5713,193+120
31 Aug 2026, 07:5713,073-438
30 Aug 2026, 10:3713,511-154
28 Aug 2026, 06:1513,665-84
27 Aug 2026, 04:4713,749-334
23 Aug 2026, 12:2314,083-277
22 Aug 2026, 00:2814,360-807
18 Aug 2026, 11:4315,167-841
18 Aug 2026, 10:1716,008no change
16 Aug 2026, 02:2316,008-631
13 Aug 2026, 01:3416,639-201
11 Aug 2026, 23:2416,840-237
11 Aug 2026, 02:0417,077-1,172
7 Aug 2026, 20:3418,249-800
6 Aug 2026, 22:1819,049first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“InstaOFF” (@InstaOFFbot), 12,759 monthly users as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InstaOFFbot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.