Channel
Intensive Review of Internal Medicine
@Intensivereview
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,581subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001158794381 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Intensivereview |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Intensivereview |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 1,581 | +2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:09 | 1,579 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 1,577 | +2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 1,575 | -1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 10:01 | 1,576 | +2 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 15:02 | 1,574 | +6 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:13 | 1,568 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 1,568 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 1,567 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:45 | 1,561 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 1,565 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 1,563 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@usmle_in_arabic · 76,001
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
@xtrateel · 28,187
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Intensive Review of Internal Medicine” (@Intensivereview), 1,581 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Intensivereview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.