Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 60 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,431–2,470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 16:41
2,460
-5
28 Sept 2026, 07:59
2,465
+14
18 Sept 2026, 23:55
2,451
+2
14 Sept 2026, 15:38
2,449
+14
10 Sept 2026, 23:19
2,435
-1
6 Sept 2026, 09:38
2,436
-5
2 Sept 2026, 09:53
2,441
-1
30 Aug 2026, 15:44
2,442
+2
27 Aug 2026, 20:04
2,440
-3
25 Aug 2026, 06:42
2,443
+6
22 Aug 2026, 16:58
2,437
-4
19 Aug 2026, 04:23
2,441
-1
16 Aug 2026, 08:04
2,442
+3
12 Aug 2026, 22:15
2,439
-8
10 Aug 2026, 01:41
2,447
+3
6 Aug 2026, 20:30
2,444
no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:23
2,444
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 18s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
255 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
89
34.9%
👍
84
32.9%
❤
64
25.1%
🔥
7
2.75%
🤯
7
2.75%
👎
2
0.784%
😭
2
0.784%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IranCoderz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
این قضیه که حکومت یک کشور، سازمان و افرادی داره که به جای تلاش برای بهبود کیفیت اینترنت، به صورت دائم در تلاشن روی اینترنت اختلال بندازن و مانع از دسترسی راحت و آزاد مردم به اینترنت بشن و برای این کار پول هم میگیرن هیچوقت برام عادی نمیشه و هربار بهش فکر میکنم یه بار دیگه تعجب میکنم. حرومزادهها شما چه موجوداتی هستید کاش بمیرید راحت شیم😱
💥 یکی از عجیبترین خبرهای این روزهای دنیای هوشمصنوعی مربوط به مدل داخلی جدید OpenAI به نام Astra است که
تونسته به ۱۰ مسئله باز در ریاضیات، علوم کامپیوتر نظری و پیچیدگی کوانتومی نتایج جدیدی اضافه کنه و برای اونها اثباتهای قابل بررسی ارائه بده. اگه این نتایج در بررسیهای علمی دوام بیارن و نقض نشن، میشه اون رو یکی از مهمترین نقاط عطف تاریخ هوش مصنوعی دونست.
🚀 اهمیت ماجرا فقط حل چند مسئله ریاضی نیست بلکه اینه که ی…
به دورهای از تاریخ رسیدیم که ساخت یک محصول از صفر و با شخصیسازی کامل، هزینه کمتری از خرید اشتراک محصولات موجود داره؛ یه جورایی از جایگزینی نیروی انسانی رد شدیم و داریم به جایگزینی خود محصولات و بیزنسها میرسیم. آینده جالب و دیدنیه واقعا.💘
🚀@IranCoderz 👨💻
یکی از مدلهایی که اخیرا خیلی سر و صدا کرده DeepSeek V4-Flash هست که با قیمت خیلی پایین به شما API میده و کاری که بقیه مدلها با چند دلار انجام میدن رو ایشون با مبالغ خیلی کمتر و اکثرا در حد چند سنت براتون انجام میده.
قدرتش قطعا قابل مقایسه با مدلهایی مثل Fable 5 و GPT-5.6 نیست ولی تقریبا هر کاری که بخواید رو میتونه براتون انجام بده و اگه یه تسک خیلی پیچیده باشه و ببینید از پسش بر نمیاد(کم پیش میاد)، میتونید س…
اگه برای ایجنت خودتون اسکیلهای کامل و آماده میخواید و حال ندارید از اول براشون اسکیل بنویسید، یه سر به سایت زیر بزنید. تقریبا هر اسکیلی که به ذهنتون بیاد رو موجود داره و خیلی راحت میتونید اونها رو برای خودتون استفاده کنید.
✈️ skillsllm
🚀@IranCoderz 👨💻
🤔 سوال سیستم دیزاین
یک اپلیکیشن موبایل داریم که به صورت مستقیم با سه سرویس بکاند زیر در ارتباطه:
- UserService
- OrderService
- PaymentService
قراره اسپرینت بعدی یک سرویس جدید به اسم NotificationService هم به این مجموعه اضافه بشه. مشکل اینجاست که تیم موبایل همین الان هم زیر بار پیچیدگیهای بالا قرار داره و حسابی از حجم سرویسها کلافه شده و هر سرویس جدیدی که اضافه میشه، باید کارهای زیر رو از اول براش انجام بدن:
…
عمو باب، یکی از کهنه کارهای صنعت نرمافزار با حدود ۶۰ سال سابقه و نویسنده چندتا از معروفترین کتابهای برنامهنویسی، تو جواب به پست آقایی که پرسیده بود راحت نیستم به کلاد اجازه بدم فایلهام رو تغییر بده و نیاز دارم رو کد خودم تسلط داشته باشم نوشته:
استراتژی الانم اینه که هیچ کدی که توسط هوشمصنوعی نوشته میشه رو نمیخونم و ریویو نمیکنم. به جای این کار، ایجنتهای خودم رو شدیدا محدود کردم و قوانین سفت و سختی براشون تع…
آقا یک ابزار پیدا کردم طلا! یعنی الان که تستش کردم اینجوریم که تو تا الان کجا بودی عزیزم؟!!
یک مجموعهای از استانداردهای UI و UX برای دستیار هوش مصنوعی دلبند شما که قدر گاو از دیزاین نمیفهمه. انقدر این استاندارد و اصولی کار میکنه که حقیقتاً پشمام!
impeccable.style
alirezanasseh
@IranCoderz
لینوس تروالدز:
میبینم که بعضی افراد در مقابل هوشمصنوعی جبهه میگیرن و از اون خوششون نمیاد و من به عنوان مینتینر اصلی کرنل لینوکس، جا داره خیلی واضح بگم که اینجا از این خبرا نیست و از هوشمصنوعی تا جایی که بشه برای توسعه لینوکس استفاده میکنیم. اگه کسی با این قضیه مشکل داره میتونه یه فورک از کرنل بگیره و برای خودش جلو بره یا کلا گم شه بره.
هوشمصنوعی هم یک ابزاری مثل بقیهس و کارهای مفیدی میشه باهاش کرد. شاید تا ی…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @IranCoderz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Geek Alerts @geekalerts · 18,940 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 4 October 2026
Crypto Insights Hub @majale_digital · 42,698 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
TechTube 𝕏 تک توب @TechTube · 80,762 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
برنامه نویسی | Programming @Azad_Developers · 37,880 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Linuxor ? @Linuxor · 31,961 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 September 2026
آموزش برنامه نویسی و طراحی سایت - سورس ایران @sourceiran · 21,022 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
Top Learn | تاپ لرن @top_learn · 19,432 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 October 2026
جادی | Jadi @jadivarlog · 103,658 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
DevTwitter | توییت برنامه نویسی @devtwitter · 32,384 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
Html and Css & Jsآموزش @htmlcss_channels · 23,040 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
Milad Nouri(ツ) میلاد نوری @miladnourichannel · 27,236 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
Job Offer With me 🎉💪 @get_joboffer · 19,324 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 October 2026
صوت | علیرضا پناهیان @Panahian_mp3 · 28,151 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
کنکور ارشد کامپیوتر @Konkurcomputer · 50,305 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
ویکی تجربه - استخدام و بررسی شرکت ها @wiki_tajrobe · 81,452 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Programmer Jokes @programmerjokes · 106,793 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
جادی پایتون | Jadi Python fans @jadi_fans · 43,751 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 28 August 2026
هوش مصنوعی [ AI ] @iFutureAI · 43,146 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
سامانه کاریابی دانشگاه های تهران @job_ut · 25,994 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026
Quera @quera_ir · 26,411 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
Job Finding | Search for your job @jobs_finding · 20,590 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IranCoderz” (@IranCoderz), 2,460 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IranCoderz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.